In real life, one thing has become apparent.
New GM styling at the green house, is chunky.
Unnecessarily thick pillars on the exterior are exacerbated on the inside with huge thick plastic caps (seemingly to hide airbags). The problem is that the new GM styling is like taking a model who once had 38-28-38 measurements and making it 40-40-38.
The Aura is one of the first (though from the looks of the first and last ever G8, it won't be the last) of the top heavy vehicles. Viewed from near three-quarter view, the appearance is unsettling fat looking. Not a graceful line can be viewed from the Aura. If someone is sitting inside the Aura, you can see how much side head room is taken up with the fat and intrusive pillar design. So fat is the a, b, and c-pillar on side to side intrusion that you'd think the designers would have at least carved an ear hole out for your ears so that they won't bump the side of the vehicle.
I've also noticed that new GM design philosophy is to make fat cars with chunky front ends that are thick with extensive overhang. Beltlines are near ear level and rear ends are lifted up off the tarmac as if they were more designed for off-road ground clearance than making room for cargo.
The overall effect of the new GM design philosophy is pure boredom - more copycatism - this time of early 1990's BMW designs without the svelteness of their simplicity or low betlines. Fat is in at GM and taste is out.
Interiorwise, GM has gone from building the cheapest possible interiors to building stupid ones - the latest hint of the G8 with parvo dog refuse colored leather (ette) shows that GM is trying too hard to be cute and doing less to build designs that actually work. The Aura, the Outcadia, the new Cadillac CTS instrument panels are disjointed collections of parts that are assembled with the care given by drunken workers who don't quite know how to insert tab a into slot b. The CTS is one of the worst designs I've ever seen from a perspective of flow and assembly continuity. Just when you expect wood to start, it has some outrageous part assembly joint and it interrupts the design flow. Instead of being assembled from the fewest parts available, Cadillac chose to make the most of its assembly intricacy while forgetting to make it flow into a coherent design. I was astonished that GM could reconcile assembling the dashboard of the new CTS with so many parts - the cost of assembly alone must be staggering. The cost to the eyes of the consumer who will end up getting a shoddy product will be more surgery and blindness.
The Aura is a decent product executed poorly. It isn't refined nor is it pretty. It steals Honda elements, G6 boot, overly thick everywhere else, and an interior that is surprisingly cramped despite the spin we've been told about the platform off which it is built. Had this product arrived five years ago, it would have been near cutting edge in this class. The fact that it arrives now only shows that it will be yesterday's news tomorrow when competitors with more foresight launch interiors with simpler lines, simpler assembly, and more attention to build detail.
If someone at GM is listening, cut the cuteness and start building for the real world. I can only imagine what that parvo waste brown color will look like when it ages.
Green anyone?