GM Inside News Forum banner
61 - 78 of 78 Posts
The verano turbo is a sweet ride. Cool compact luxury product. Best in class..IMO

Looks sharp in cocoa brown, white or the silver. Those are the colors I've seen it in so far. I think it's really sharp...
 
That's par for the course, Charlie. The high belt line is what gives the car that chunky look.
Unfortunately it's the result of current crash safety regulations which dictate front height (to save pedestrians) and side safety design. Either you have a high beltline & overall height increases (which make the car look pudgy), or you narrow the side windows to the size of mail slots, a trend first seen with the Chrysler 300. I don't like the look either, but safety standards are mandated by politicians not car designers.
 
Re: Roadtable Review: 2013 Buick Verano Turbo

This is one of those cars that you want to like but just can't quite come to grips with. It looks okay from the front and the rear taillights are interesting. But from the side view it is frumpy and generic. The 2.4 makes adequate power but is a bit loud and nothing special on gas with the turbo offering the power but disappointing mileage considering this car's small size. Speaking of size, I would have a real tough time churning out 30 large for something this small and cramped no matter how quiet it goes down the road or how quick it was from 0-60. If I can't fit 4-5 adults in the car or a stroller etc in the trunk then the entire car becomes moot. I couldn't fathom how a normal family of 4 or 5 could ever live with something this small unless it was being used for a commuter car to college or a second occasional use vehicle.
So you wouldn't spend $30k on a 400hp Mustang because its small inside?

The Verano intrigues me. At its $23k base price the Verano makes an appealing car for the missus. I already own a large hauler in my Avalanche, we don't need two. It's more mature styling is more appealing to us than the youthful looks Cruze or Focus. The base Verano offers 190hp, 32mpg, a tomb quiet interior, excellent infotainment, lots of standard content, and the smoothest ride of anything that size. It's a good value.
 
Re: Roadtable Review: 2013 Buick Verano Turbo

After reading the review and all the comments here, it really is amazing how car companies sell anything! :D I LOVE the looks of the Verano, front and back! I like it better than the "chunky, clunky" back of the Regal. I like the waterfall grill in the front. I like the side little windows in front. Yes, I wish it had LED lights in front and back. Yes, a lumbar support would be nice, but these are not deal breakers. I love my red Verano Turbo! I hate those big ugly scoops in the front of the Regal GS. I guess to each his own? ;)
 
Re: Roadtable Review: 2013 Buick Verano Turbo

Agreed. I would really like to see the 1.6 turbo rumored to be in the 2014 Verano. The 1.6 could possibly weight less, yet, have similar horsepower. I am not sure about the torque ratings for the 1.6 turbo versus the 2.4 and 2.5 Ecotecs, however. Comments from members more familiar with the 1.6 turbo would be welcomed!
The top version of the new 1.6 SIDI Turbo makes 200hp at 4,700 rpm and 220lb-ft of torque at 1,700rpm. You can already order at Opel the ecoFLEX version with 170hp @ 6,000rpm and 192lb-ft @ 1,650-3,500rpm.
 
Excellent review guys. It's nice to hear different points of view. Gives one a better overall perspective on things. I keep thinking this car will replace my '11 Malibu at some point, but the gas mileage is the sticking point. It needs to do better than I have now in order to make it for me.
 
I notice that the Verano is built on the on the Delta II platform. Is this the same platform used on the Encore small SUV? If so, I have a strong urge to do an AWD transplant from the Encore to the Verano via the GM parts bin! Can you say Verano AWD Convertible? Sure you can!
 
Damn, that's too bad. The Astra convertible pictures I saw on the site a couple of months ago looked really sharp and the rumor is that a Verano convertible is in the pipe (a Buick salesperson at the New England International Auto show in January told me that a Verano convertible was due in the fall of 2013 as a 2014 model). Adding the AWD as an option would partially solve the FWD problem for those of us who want RWD or have to drive a convertible in the winter because we can only afford one car.
 
Whenever I look at a Buick, all I see is a rebadged Chevy complete with Chevy internals/power train. Not impressive.

Buick has a serious identity crisis on their hands.
 
Whenever I look at a Buick, all I see is a rebadged Chevy complete with Chevy internals/power train. Not impressive.

Thats ok, whenever I look at this site, I see people commenting that know nothing about what they're talking about.

What Buick is a rebadged Chevy?

Because I doubt that there is a single sheetmetal or plastic component on the outside of any Buick that will bolt onto a Chevrolet, and you're likely to find the same inside and last time I checked, there are no "Chevy engines" GM cars have engines from GM Powertrain, hell the 3.6 V6 debuted in Cadillacs before it was even in any Chevrolets.
 
Whenever I look at a Buick, all I see is a rebadged Chevy complete with Chevy internals/power train. Not impressive.

Buick has a serious identity crisis on their hands.
Ever try driving a Buick Verano and a Chevy Cruze? Try it, then come back and let us know if you can make the same statement. They are world's apart!

 
I own a Verano Turbo which I factory ordered and took delivery in January. I agree with some of the wishes for just a few more optional upgrades such as HID, but don't really miss them. I didn't order a sunroof (leak & rattle roof +extra wt.) or navi system (belong to CAA) but did get the automatic as I live in the city. Once past the break-in and winter months, mileage has been excellent. When I eventually replace the tires I will upgrade, but the Conti's will do for now as I don't drive aggressively. One of the selling points for me was that extra cost goodies were not part of the package. It's one thing to get special brakes or tires included in the purchase price, but when it comes time for service or replacement and you find out the cost is double or you have to wait for the parts then that is an issue. If you drive hard, you would miss the upgrades, but then if you drive hard this is the wrong car choice. It is nicely sized, decent handling and has good power for acceleration or passing when needed. The interior is excellent. While the exterior is bland and a little pudgy looking (plus a heavier car than you might expect) it looks classy and similar to other Buicks. Sure, a bigger car would be nice to own, but a larger car with similar features (Regal GS or Lacrosse V-6) would cost $10-20G more. As a mostly driver only means of transportation, this car suits my needs. I have parked beside a Cruze LTZ/RS in the same colour for comparison. The Cruze was ok and a little cheaper but the Verano is more upscale in all respects and has the power I want.
 
I've said this before and I'll say it again: Verano is the best car GM builds, relative to its segment and intended mission. One could argue that the Impala also fits this description, but I can't speak to it because I've not driven it. I have, however, driven a Verano with the base motor and automatic trans with a price tag of $27,000 and some change, and it is a truly outstanding vehicle in every respect. And the car I drove has the motor I wouldn't choose and the transmission I would NEVER buy, yet I believe this is a great car, even in this configuration.

Anyone who claims that it's "just a re-badged Cruze" simply has not driven a Verano or just willfully ignorant and spreading misinformation.

I've driven both and I know the truth.
 
I've said this before and I'll say it again: Verano is the best car GM builds, relative to its segment and intended mission. One could argue that the Impala also fits this description, but I can't speak to it because I've not driven it. I have, however, driven a Verano with the base motor and automatic trans with a price tag of $27,000 and some change, and it is a truly outstanding vehicle in every respect. And the car I drove has the motor I wouldn't choose and the transmission I would NEVER buy, yet I believe this is a great car, even in this configuration.

Anyone who claims that it's "just a re-badged Cruze" simply has not driven a Verano or just willfully ignorant and spreading misinformation.

I've driven both and I know the truth.
I'd argue the Tahoe is the best car GM builds for its intended use, but the Verano makes a good case for itself too. Its a fantastic car.
 
I'd argue the Tahoe is the best car GM builds for its intended use, but the Verano makes a good case for itself too. Its a fantastic car.
Having owned an '07 Tahoe, I can speak to the fact that it's a nice, comfortable SUV that's priced right. I would argue, however, that the lack of fold-flat rear-seating, cramped third-row, and absence of hi-tech features means that it falls short, even against the lesser-selling Expedition.
 
61 - 78 of 78 Posts