GM Inside News Forum banner

Oil Bubble, or Bubble Babble?

4.5K views 47 replies 20 participants last post by  smith7629  
#1 ·
Investing for the oil price collapse

Investing for the oil price collapse
Commentary: The question is not if, but when prices will come down
By Michael Lynch
Last update: 7:02 a.m. EDT May 30, 2008

BOSTON (MarketWatch) -- Although a number of books and many articles have been written describing how to profit from ever-higher oil prices, not much has been said about what will happen when prices come down, as they are all but certain to do.

Certainly, a political disruption of oil supplies -- civil war in Nigeria, major fighting in southern Iraq, attacks on Caspian pipelines -- could occur and would send prices sharply higher, but overall there is a greater likelihood that prices will drop in the next few years, and perhaps sharply.

Oil is a mean-reverting commodity. Since the industry's early days, price revolved around a mean of less than $25 a barrel for over a century, despite world wars, the market monopoly of Standard Oil, the cartelization by the Texas Railroad Commission and finally the U.S. import quotas in the 1950s and 1960s. Only OPEC was able to raise it above those levels.

Others have made the very pertinent point that oil production seems to be increasing only slowly of late, while demand continues to grow and the booming economies of Asia are creating new, wealthy consumers in large numbers, suggesting a 'new oil market paradigm' where prices will not retreat cyclically.

However, these arguments represent the typical characterization by analysts of a cycle (or a bubble) as a permanent change, not unlike what was heard in the late 1970s, when nearly everyone studying the oil industry -- except for a few contrarians -- predicted ever rising prices. Oil companies diversified away from their areas of expertise (Mobil bought Montgomery Ward, and Exxon bought Reliance Electric, as two of many examples), car companies tried to accommodate the shift towards efficiency (GM) introduced the diesel Oldsmobile, while Chrysler briefly abandoned its large car lines), and investors searched for the silver bullet that would be the foundation of the next new energy industry.

The situation is roughly the same this time. Global demand growth has been slightly over 1% the past several years, even when the global economy was strong, down from the nearly 2% growth seen in the mid-1990s. Serious conservation has been slow to appear but all signs are that it is arriving and gathering strength, just as it did in the 1980s.

And while it is true that the supply side suffers from various problems, none of these are permanent. The loss in oil production from Hurricane Katrina alone would be enough to take OECD inventories to near-record levels, and supply losses from Iraq, Nigeria, and Venezuela have meant an ongoing loss of between 2 and 3 million barrels a day. Without these transient events, the market would be in glut.

Tipping point

What could cause oil prices to fall? A variety of short-term and longer-term factors can suggest an impending drop in prices, based on the recent explanations by traders for the perceived value of oil.

Given that the weak U.S. dollar has been cited as a major reason for the recent run-up in oil prices, signs that the U.S. economy is bottoming out, that the U.S. Fed is planning to cease cutting interest rates, that inflation in Europe is moderating and/or the European Central Bank is planning to cut interest rates, would tend to discourage oil price bulls and see some weakness.

More immediately perhaps, the likely rise in 2nd quarter OECD oil inventories -- which due to data lag won't be apparent until mid-summer -- should cause the market to move to contango, which eliminates profits from a rollover strategy. U.S. inventories have already begun to rise notably, reflecting a likely increase (globally) of about 1 million barrels a day.
Longer term, concerns about oil demand, particularly in China and India, would be assuaged by signs of weaker demand in response to higher prices; not shrinking demand, but slower growth which would suggest long-term trends would be below the bulls' expectations. And, of course, a recovery in supply would do much to deflate the bull market, whether from resumption of production in Nigeria (possible but unpredictable), strong increases from Iraq (likely in the next year or two), or improved performance from other non-OPEC sources (likely but of uncertain timing).

More here: http://www.marketwatch.com/news/sto...id={171FCC3C-E054-419E-A4D7-B3BCABD0EBAC}&siteid=yhoof&print=true&dist=printTop
 
#2 ·
Don't Believe Oil-Bubble Babble
Martin T. Sosnoff 05.30.08, 6:00 AM ET

When I jotted down all the bubbles I experienced over the past 50 years, I was surprised how long the list ran.

Why not throw oil on that list of bubbles? After all, some of us remember when oil sold at $3 a barrel scarcely more than 30 years ago.

Bubble, bubble, toil and trouble. The market is saying don't pay attention to oil commodity futures spiking. Energy-related stocks just shaded their highs by 5 to 10%. A Goldman Sachs analyst broke into print with a $200 a barrel call on oil, but Goldman maybe talks its own book. They run commodity funds and are a major operator in oil futures trading.

The bears on oil point to short covering by traders and energy producers who sold far out futures, which spurted $10 and put the oil market close to a contango position where long futures trade above spot market quotes.

Meanwhile, oil equity analysts choose to stay behind the curve on current oil prices. At year end their earnings models carried oil at $85 a barrel for 2008. At the end of the March quarter, they moved to $95 a barrel and currently $100, far below the $130 spot price. Many analysts are modeling oil at $85 next year and beyond. The upshot of all this gamesmanship is that if oil holds above $125 a barrel, the Street's earnings projections could be 20% too low for major energy properties.

But macro thinking on oil is changing. There is no longer just one lonesome bear on energy supply, Matt Simmons in Texas. The scarcity scenario for oil is taking shape in think tanks around the world. Lukoil believes oil reserves are peaking in Russia. Satellite photography of the Saudi elephantine fields confirms more pressure pumping activity to maintain current production levels.

The developing world is using more and more oil. Even if China's monetary authorities kill off an inflationary economy with high interest rates, their gross domestic product (GDP) isn't going to zero from the present 10%-a-year growth rate.

The near-term test for oil is the U.S economy. If we sink into a deep recession, oil demand sloughs off. So far, with GDP near zero, daily oil imports are down just 200,000 barrels on an 11 million barrel base. Demand destruction is coming with diesel at $5.19 a gallon.

Pickup trucks stay parked in driveways. Ford Motor just owned up to falling demand for pickups and SUVs, always the most profitable models in their line. They no longer see any daylight for earnings this year. Our airlines just sank into the sunset with share prices down to low single digits for Delta, U.S. Airways and American Airlines. They are largely un-hedged in jet fuel, burning 500 million or more gallons, quarterly.

While oil stocks the past 12 months showed buoyancy, they've underperformed recent futures market fireworks. Refining and marketing profits are shrinking with no low-cost heavy oil to refine at wide crack spreads. The golden age of refining is history. There's no price gouging at the pump; refining margins stand paper thin.

Energy stocks do not meet my criteria of a bubble. The sector peaked above a 25% weighting in the S&P 500 Index more than 25 years ago. Today, energy is a 14% weighting in the index, up from 6% a couple of years ago. A year from now, I expect energy to approach 20% of the index and to give the tech sector a good run for market primacy.

Reservations center on rapidly rising operating costs for all producers, minimal refining margins and cyclically vulnerable chemicals earnings. Everyone's drilling and exploration activity needs to step up. This will boost depreciation expense for years to come.

More here: http://www.forbes.com/2008/05/29/energy-oil-bubble-oped-cx_mts_0530sosnoff_print.html
 
#4 ·
Every year about 4 million trucks and suvs are replaced 25%. They are being replaced more and more with cars and smaller crossovers. Now only about 15% of the market is trucks and traditional suvs. That translates into about 1.4 million buyers a year downsizing. Then you throw in scooters and motorcycles and demand for gas will go down slightly for Americans. It's like taking the composite CAFE of the nations vehicles and increasing it from say 21 to 23/24 mpg. Doesn't sound like much but percentage-wise it is 9-12% increase as these vehicles filter into the market. I think in 3 years, Americans will be using about 15% less fuel than we do today.

It will make a big difference but it won't make up for supply increases, especially with the $2500 car on the way.
 
#8 · (Edited)
Only way we see 200.00/bbl soon is an unforeseen disaster or, an attempt by our current record holder to beat his own mark - raise the bar a bit - go out with a bang for
- the greatest strategic blunder in the history of the United States.
. Chinese demand is now weakening - for the year worldwide total we'll end up plus 1 to 2% - or less.
 
#9 ·
I call bubble as well. We'll never see $50/bbl. oil again, even if the US Dollar rebounds, but it will settle under $100. I don't see gasoline being less than $2.50/gal. again either, but it should settle under $3.
 
#17 ·
Hey, I didn't suggest that Suburban drivers should trade-in on Smart cars. People can buy what they want, just as they always have.

All I'm saying is that GM is wasting their time and money designing fuel efficient vehicles, since they're clearly not needed. The price of gas is going down, so why waste money developing the Volt when they could spend that cash redesigning the Trailblazer and Envoy, for example? Those vehicles have already paid for themselves, and the plant has an unsure future. Scrap the Volt and bring out some more SUVs.
 
#19 ·
Hey, I didn't suggest that Suburban drivers should trade-in on Smart cars. People can buy what they want, just as they always have.

All I'm saying is that GM is wasting their time and money designing fuel efficient vehicles, since they're clearly not needed. The price of gas is going down, so why waste money developing the Volt when they could spend that cash redesigning the Trailblazer and Envoy, for example? Those vehicles have already paid for themselves, and the plant has an unsure future. Scrap the Volt and bring out some more SUVs.
Wait, what? The price of fuel is going down? Has something major happened since I last re-fueled my vehicle? Are you being sarcastic or serious? Now I am lost. Yesterday I saw a gallon of gas for between $3.99 and $4.09 a gallon in Pennsylvania!!!

We need fuel efficient vehicles, but my point is even in the light of high fuel prices some people will be unwilling to go into very small vehicles. GM does need better small vehicles and fuel efficient vehicles like the Volt, the Astra, the Cobalt, Aveo, Beat, etc, etc, etc. However, vehicles like the Vue and Enclave are needed for people who want to downsized from a Suburban or Tahoe but not to a Cobalt.
 
#18 ·
It really is simple. The dollar is down, we have limited refining capacity, and we aren't allowed to drill for or extract oil in our country where we have, perhaps, the world's second largest reserves.

Let's see...
Value of dollar falls, stuff gets more expensive.
You can't process the oil that is out there into gasoline, you limit supply, price goes up. And finally, we can't drill for more oil so, yep, supply is consrtained and prices go up.

Demand is realatively flat so... yup... prices move up.

The good and bad news is that this bubble is just a bubble. It is bad news because we won't make the decision to proceed on alternatie fuels and won't allow drilling in the US. Therefore when prices come back down, people get complacent and nothing gets done.

The good news is that there are enough capitalists out there now that see the writing on the wall that the environmentalists won't let us drill domestically and will develop alternaitve fuel technologies that will be viable when we get the next bubble. And then, finally, we might break our dependance on foreign oil. Then I'll leave it to environmentalists to complain about whatever that alternative is and we can start the cycle all over.
 
#20 ·
It really is simple. The dollar is down, we have limited refining capacity, and we aren't allowed to drill for or extract oil in our country where we have, perhaps, the world's second largest reserves.

Let's see...
Value of dollar falls, stuff gets more expensive.
You can't process the oil that is out there into gasoline, you limit supply, price goes up. And finally, we can't drill for more oil so, yep, supply is consrtained and prices go up.

Demand is realatively flat so... yup... prices move up.

The good and bad news is that this bubble is just a bubble. It is bad news because we won't make the decision to proceed on alternatie fuels and won't allow drilling in the US. Therefore when prices come back down, people get complacent and nothing gets done.

The good news is that there are enough capitalists out there now that see the writing on the wall that the environmentalists won't let us drill domestically and will develop alternaitve fuel technologies that will be viable when we get the next bubble. And then, finally, we might break our dependance on foreign oil. Then I'll leave it to environmentalists to complain about whatever that alternative is and we can start the cycle all over.
I knew gas prices were partially due to the performance of the dollar and lack of refining, but I thought China and India's need for oil was also driving up the price of oil. I didn't think the demand for oil was "flat".
 
#21 ·
Hey dude, I'm just being silly to make a point. Here's the title from the story in question:

Commentary: The question is not if, but when prices will come down
I worry that telling people that prices will come down will distract them from the fact that, regardless of the gas prices today, we need to invest in alternative fuels and more economical vehicles and modes of transportation. If gas drops to $2.00 tomorrow for some reason or another people will rush out and buy Suburbans and Expeditions because most people do not have an long-term vision.
 
#22 ·
Hey dude, I'm just being silly to make a point. Here's the title from the story in question:



I worry that telling people that prices will come down will distract them from the fact that, regardless of the gas prices today, we need to invest in alternative fuels and more economical vehicles and modes of transportation. If gas drops to $2.00 tomorrow for some reason or another people will rush out and buy Suburbans and Expeditions because most people do not have an long-term vision.
Oh lol, now I see your point. :D

I agree and I want to see more fuel efficient vehicles and vehicles that don't need oil but at the same time I don't want my only car options to be small, uncomfortable, and underpowered cars. Most people don't need Suburbans and Expeditions but I don't like how certain people generalize and make it sound like all suv's are wasteful vehicles. Again a 2-Mode Enclave or Vue can get the fuel economy of a mid/large sized sedan. People got even as high as 30 MPG with the 2-Mode Tahoe.
 
#23 · (Edited)
I don't think the vast majority of consumers are as short- sighted as you think, paul. I was out running a couple errands this morning and was struck again by how many fullsize SUVs and pickups are sitting on used car lots. It seemed like the entire used car side of the Honda dealership where I bought my wife's Odyssey was nothing but Tahoes, Suburbans, and Expeditions. You can't really think that all the people who've dumped their fullsize trucks and SUVs (many times while they were upside down on their loans) are gonna run right back to the dealership to flip the Camrys and Accords they've bought in the last few months just because gas prices go back down to a level (i.e. over $2 a gallon) that most of us will still consider outrageously expensive?

I think you have to figure in the shock of high gas prices in the last few years into the national psyche before you call for more full size SUVs. People will remember that gas was $4- $5 a gallon before they buy a new Suburban even if gas in 2012 is back down to $2- $3 a gallon. Many (if not most) people will live in fear that the decrease is only temporary, especially since there will still be price swings of $0.50 - $0.75 during the changeover from Winter to Summer blend every year and around major holidays, etc.

Hopefully, it's a bubble that will soon burst and oil will settle down into the $60 a barrel range. Of course, after the bubble bursts, everytime the price of a barrel of crude ticks up a buck or two, the media will be reporting on it as proof that oil is back up on it's way to $200 a barrel this time.

All of that, combined with the dirt- worshipping, bunny hugging enviroweenie ethos that everybody seems to be buying into these days will conspire to keep traditional truck based fullsize SUV and large pickup sales down to levels well below what they once were. The market has so many more choices now that I can't see the majority of soccer moms going back to the Suburbans or Expeditions that most of them never needed in the first place. I think the fear of another gas shock will keep the R&D into more fuel efficient vehicles going as consumers remain gunshy about purchasing cars and trucks that are still considered "thirsty" for their primary car.
 
#25 ·
I hope that you don't plan your future investments and spending on the hope that oil will fall to $60 / bbl and fuel back to $2.00. That seems like hiding from the boogeyman.

Why not plan for it to be $3.75 this year, 4.50 next, 5.00 the next, $5.50 the next, $6.00 the next, etc etc. Do you really want to make buying decisions today on the hope that fuel will be $2.00 gallon forever in the future and wake up in 6 yrs to find that it's $7.00 a gallon? Do you want to buy a $40000 vehicle this year using 25 gal of $4.00 fuel every week and find that it uses 25 gal of $5.50 fuel in 2011 and find that your 3 y.o. $40000 vehicle is worth less than $10000?

I see it every day. Decisions made back in 2005 are coming back to bite whole segments of the buying public in the butt. They simply cannot get out from underneath their gas-sucking beast. It's much much better for this group just to suck it up and 'pay the man' $100 every week this year ( $5000 annually in gas ); $115 every week next year ( $5500 annually in gas ) and $130 every weeks in 2010 ( $6000 annually in gas )....then dump the beast when it's paid off.
 
#27 ·
Let's see if I can pull some numbers out of my butt too and give you a baseless gut feel....yep there it is...I predict a surge in E85 and bio diesel availability in the next few years....therefore I'm buying a 2009 Suburban LTZ or 2009 Denali XL with the new flex fuel 6.2L. That's 403 H.P. of throaty muscle car like, alcohol burning acceleration.:drive:
 
#31 ·
I think my point was that most people won't be making decisions on the expectation that gas will remain at $2.00 forever if (when) it falls that low again. My point was that the run- up we've seen in the last couple of years will temper the decisions of the car buying public and we will see a long term trend to more fuel efficient choices in personal vehicles overall.

Does that mean that everybody is going to run out an buy a Prius? Of course not. But it might mean that Sally Soccermom buys a minivan or a crossover that gets 25 mpg on the highway instead of a Suburban that gets 16 mpg to drive her kids to ballet practice. It might mean that Reggie ******* buys a slightly more fuel efficient Colorado instead of a full- size Silverado. It might mean that if he does decide to buy a Silverado he seriously considers whether or not he really needs the added weight of a 4WD system that he never uses (most people don't) and buys a 2WD instead, giving him a little better mileage. It might mean that Carl Commuter, who's just looking for a practical car to get him from point A to B, buys a 4 cylinder Camry, Accord, or Malabu instead of a 6 cylinder version. It might mean that he chooses to use more public transportation.

Those arre the kind of practical decisions I expect consumers to make. Taken together each one will add up to a lot of savings. By the same token, buying into doom and gloom predictions (or wishful thinking, on the part of our liberal friends) of $12 a gallon gas is no way to live either. $2.50- $3.00 a gallon gas is still high enough to encourage the development and demand for more fuel efficient vehicles while still allowing people to FREELY make choices in how they want to live and spend their disposable income.
 
#33 ·
I think my point was that most people won't be making decisions on the expectation that gas will remain at $2.00 forever if (when) it falls that low again. My point was that the run- up we've seen in the last couple of years will temper the decisions of the car buying public and we will see a long term trend to more fuel efficient choices in personal vehicles overall.

Does that mean that everybody is going to run out an buy a Prius? Of course not. But it might mean that Sally Soccermom buys a minivan or a crossover that gets 25 mpg on the highway instead of a Suburban that gets 16 mpg to drive her kids to ballet practice. It might mean that Reggie ******* buys a slightly more fuel efficient Colorado instead of a full- size Silverado. It might mean that if he does decide to buy a Silverado he seriously considers whether or not he really needs the added weight of a 4WD system that he never uses (most people don't) and buys a 2WD instead, giving him a little better mileage. It might mean that Carl Commuter, who's just looking for a practical car to get him from point A to B, buys a 4 cylinder Camry, Accord, or Malabu instead of a 6 cylinder version. It might mean that he chooses to use more public transportation.

Those arre the kind of practical decisions I expect consumers to make. Taken together each one will add up to a lot of savings. By the same token, buying into doom and gloom predictions (or wishful thinking, on the part of our liberal friends) of $12 a gallon gas is no way to live either. $2.50- $3.00 a gallon gas is still high enough to encourage the development and demand for more fuel efficient vehicles while still allowing people to FREELY make choices in how they want to live and spend their disposable income.
Yes agreed, this is happening already and has since the end of 2003. The market is changing dramatically. Wait til May's numbers come out on Tuesday. The rate of defections from the various heavy vehicles is beyond anything the vehicle makers had planned for ( see Mullaly's comments earlier this month ).
 
#42 ·
How does Bush change the global price of crude? Do you not understand that the falling dollar is the reason for most of the recent jump in prices? How has the price increase in fuel been the work of Bush and not the refineries. The war has been going on for a lot more than six months, so why is the price spiking up so much now. Do you actually think that Obama could get the price of gas to go down?

Put your tin foil hat back on now.
 
#44 ·
How does Bush change the global price of crude? Do you not understand that the falling dollar is the reason for most of the recent jump in prices? How has the price increase in fuel been the work of Bush and not the refineries. The war has been going on for a lot more than six months, so why is the price spiking up so much now. Do you actually think that Obama could get the price of gas to go down?

Put your tin foil hat back on now.
He obviously doesn't have full control of oil prices, but his actions have a direct affect on the price of oil in US$. These are all of his doing. It's very very clear. His personal war, Mr Bush's War, is wasting away our resourses to the point where he and his Administration are printing money that we don't have ( writing checks to the Chinese and Japanese ) in order to finance his war in Iraq. It's Billions$ every week and we don't have it to spend. So where is this money coming from to pay our soldiers, pay the Blackwaters, pay for ammo, fuel, new weapons? It comes out of thin air. We don't have it. So the Treasury Dept just prints it.

They write a check for $15 Billion ( T-Bill auction ) which no one wants ( drives down the value of the US$ ) and they go to Japan and China and arm twists them that if they want to keep selling in the States that they'd better cash his check. So they do. Rinse - Wash - Repeat 30 days later when the US Treasury floats another $20 Billion auction and not one other country steps up. Call to Tokyo and Beijing again. More money is put into circulation that no one wants ( driving down the value of the US$ even more ).

This part is personally his responsibility.

The fact that oil demand is increasing all over the globe thus driving prices up for everyone is another part of the equation of course. On this the Administration has no influence except whether to buy more oil or not for the SPR stocks.

But my point is that the Administration is all for oil spiraling upward for the various reasons I noted above..
..it makes us want to use less
..it's good for his friends in the oil industry
..if we use less eventually we may end up sending less to the MidEast ( spurious goal )
..if we use less the Military has more available for its protection of us.
 
#43 ·
The blame lies with bush - he's the leader, the quarterback, the head hocho.

The blame lies with this congress and senate who has failed to do anything like allow us to drill in Alaska for example or offshore. BTW, the government is making a pretty penny off high gas prices, i.e. higher the price, the more taxes they take in.

The blame lies with oil companies who are on record saying they will not build a new refinery because oil - gas and diesel, may or may not be the fuel of the future and they can't invest that kind of money in something that may not be needed. (IF YOUR BUYING THAT ONE, THAN YOUR AN IDIOT.) Big oil blames ethanol and bio fuels also, saying we seem to be shifting toward that.

The blame lies with the greenie enviromentalist wackos, the Al Gore crowd who is convinced the sky is falling and burning fossil fuels is killing us all.

The blame lies with GM, toyota, etc. who are just now giving us some high mpg alternatives. Why did seat warmers and rear seat DVD players replace fuel efficiency and lighter vehicles as the goal? Sure gas was cheap, but so what.

Fact is we have the perfect storm. As long as everyone just continues to take it, accept it, and elect the same idiots over and over - expect more of the same. Clinton, Obama, McCain? There all the same. Politicians.

If that's not sad enough, how many of you have taken the time to flood your representatives email with messages about how sick and tired you are of them doing nothing about the problem? Let those A-holes in Washington know you vote and your sick of there crap! Instead of posting here, write those S.O.B.s and remind them who they work for! You did nothing at $2 a gallon. You did nothing at $3 a gallon. You did nothing at $4 a gallon. Will you do something now, before it gets to $5 a gallon? (Or are you waiting for the cost of EVERYTHNG TO double or triple first? You do realize that the diesel those truckers are buying figures right into everything you see on store shelves?)


The revolution starts now! Viva la revolucion! (Oh wait, I can't tonight. My show is on tonight, what about tomorrow?)
 
#45 ·
The blame lies with bush - he's the leader, the quarterback, the head hocho.

The blame lies with this congress and senate who has failed to do anything like allow us to drill in Alaska for example or offshore. BTW, the government is making a pretty penny off high gas prices, i.e. higher the price, the more taxes they take in.

The blame lies with oil companies who are on record saying they will not build a new refinery because oil - gas and diesel, may or may not be the fuel of the future and they can't invest that kind of money in something that may not be needed. (IF YOUR BUYING THAT ONE, THAN YOUR AN IDIOT.) Big oil blames ethanol and bio fuels also, saying we seem to be shifting toward that.

The blame lies with the greenie enviromentalist wackos, the Al Gore crowd who is convinced the sky is falling and burning fossil fuels is killing us all.

The blame lies with GM, toyota, etc. who are just now giving us some high mpg alternatives. Why did seat warmers and rear seat DVD players replace fuel efficiency and lighter vehicles as the goal? Sure gas was cheap, but so what.

Fact is we have the perfect storm. As long as everyone just continues to take it, accept it, and elect the same idiots over and over - expect more of the same. Clinton, Obama, McCain? There all the same. Politicians.

If that's not sad enough, how many of you have taken the time to flood your representatives email with messages about how sick and tired you are of them doing nothing about the problem? Let those A-holes in Washington know you vote and your sick of there crap! Instead of posting here, write those S.O.B.s and remind them who they work for! You did nothing at $2 a gallon. You did nothing at $3 a gallon. You did nothing at $4 a gallon. Will you do something now, before it gets to $5 a gallon? (Or are you waiting for the cost of EVERYTHNG TO double or triple first? You do realize that the diesel those truckers are buying figures right into everything you see on store shelves?)


The revolution starts now! Viva la revolucion! (Oh wait, I can't tonight. My show is on tonight, what about tomorrow?)

You missed the BIG one(s) to blame. The biggest offenders are staring back at us in the mirror every single morning.

This is a basic fact of economics. With no buyers there are no sales!!

As long as we continue to buy at the same rate as we did in the 90's when fuel was under $1.00 a gallon then we have no one to blame but ourselves. But luckily we are smarter than all the rest and we are quicker than all the rest to react. See this month's sales stats. It's been going on for at least 5 years now.

We are getting out of our huge gas-sucking beasts faster than Toyota and Honda and Ford can make their hybrids. Those sales along with small cars are BOOMING!!! Big Rigs are dinosaurs headed for the tar pits. Those that refuse to change will be carried into the tar pits along with the dino's.

This is good. One of the President's goals is being met.
We soon will be using a lot less fuel than we did in the past. $5 a gallon fuel will speed up this changeover and $6 a gallon fuel will make it stick. Note that in the past 30 days both Ford and today GM both stated that May was a turning point. Officially now they are on board that fuel will never come down again and both are officially in the small car business again. Thus we buy more efficient vehicles using less fuel.

This is good. THREE more of the President's goas are met.
Each of us uses less fuel.
Less money hopefully is sent to the Mideast.
Oil companies can raise prices freely ( make more profits for friends ).
There is less strain on the supply of oil so that the Military is not so stressed out.
 
#48 ·
PHISHPHOOD, you have good points but you have no data that says the military is the biggest consumer of oil in the U.S. The number of aircraft sorties (combat and combat support combined) and military convoys in OIF and OEF pale in comparison to the commercial jet traffic and commercial trucking industry in this country. You may have confused the fact that the USAF is the largest consumer of oil in the U.S. government, but not the nation as a whole....not by a long shot.