GM Inside News Forum banner

New Cruze Diesel Going For 50+ MPG? MZ4 Transmission To Have .61 6th Gear

5.7K views 17 replies 13 participants last post by  jpd80  
#1 ·
.

Image


The 2017 Cruze Diesel Order Guide is up, and shows the model will be available in LT trim only with very limited options for the manual transmission and a better selection for the automatic version. Note the .61 ratio for the manual transmission equipped MZ4 unit. GM is going for maximum MPG no doubt.

Click HERE for the order guide.

Click HERE for the 2017 GM Powertrain Guide. The diesel Cruze automatic uses the M3D (9th gear = .62) transmission, the manual Cruze diesel uses the MZ4 (6th gear = .61) transmission.


.
 
#4 ·
They were hitting 42mpg with the old unleaded powered Cruze Eco. Was hoping/expecting an Eco model this time around as well, that produced ~44mpg. Or if they didn't want to create a separate trim, I figured GM then would take their full "bag of tricks" from the Eco trim, apply them to the regular trims, get 42mpg, and call it a day.

With that in mind, hitting 50mpg highway in a diesel isn't really a stretch.

Disappointing that the manual can't be loaded with options.
 
#7 ·
The Germany domestic market Astra K Dynamic 1.6 CDTI 136 PS with auto start stop (largely the same engine as in Cruze diesel) has the following fuel consumption figures using NEDC - EUDC cycle:

6-speed automatic transmission
highway (l/100 km) 3.7 - 3.8
city (l/100 km) 5.5 - 5.7
combined (l/100 km) 4.4 - 4.5
U.S. mpg conversion: 61.9 - 63.6 highway; 41.3 - 42.8 city; 52.3 - 53.5 combined

6-speed manual transmission
highway (l/100 km): 3.4 - 3.5
city (l/100 km): 4.4 - 4.6
combined (l/100 km): 3.8 - 3.9
U.S. mpg conversion: 67.2 - 69.2 highway; 51.1 - 53.5 city; 60.3 - 61.9 combined

The U.S. EPA test procedure is more stringent than NEDC and will produce worse fuel consumption figures. However, I still think that 50 mpg in EPA's highway test is quite possible for Cruze Diesel 6MT.
 
#11 · (Edited)
Yes it seems that there are a few typos on there. It says the ATS (non-V) is available with a TR6060 6 Speed manual with the LGX, which it sadly isn't. It also says the CTS is available with a manual if you opt for the LTG, which also sadly isn't true. Then you have the CT6 saying it's available in a manual with the LTG as well. Please prove me wrong GM!! Also, for some of the Cadillacs, it is inaccurate when specifying AWD or RWD. The CT6 is labeld as only RWD with the LGW. Yeah I wish!! :confused:
 
#15 · (Edited)
Re: New Cruze Diesel Going For 50+ MPG? MZ4 Transmission May Have .61 6th Gear

.

The diesel Cruze automatic uses the M3D (9th gear = .62) transmission, the manual Cruze diesel uses the MZ4 (6th gear = .61) transmission.


.
50 miles a gallon could really bring notice to Chevrolet, and it's new Whisper-Diesel models. I have to admit I am really looking forward to a test drive.


.

Yes.... although there are different and 'tougher' EM concerns that all ( Gasser and Diesel ) must overcome going forward which make MPG 'harder'.


The 'new' 6MT ( MZ4 ) with the 0.610 final gear / sixth gear - and the accompanying 3.65 final drive is not an unusual thing with regard to either number together, or separately for a Six / Six + speed MT. We also need to keep in mind - all the other ratios are often, considerably lower especially to no surprise, first gear.

The new Nine Speed CAT with the top gear / eighth gear of 0.620 X a 3.17 final drive does stand out along the lines of what you suggest with regard to other Cruze combos.

But perhaps .... not as much or just for that purpose as some might assume - compared to outside of Cruze / Cruze type and class.

( Just going to skip all other greater than Six FWD ATs currenty offered of whatever type - to keep this manageable.)

With the larger gear spread compared to any and all other CAT types Sixes..... and with a TD in front - all that spread has to be well, spread around.

So a small but nonetheless significant 'amount' goes on one side of the (gear times final drive) six speed range and then, a bunch of gears and spread within the same (gear times final drive) bandwidth but shifted around by the final drive, and then yes, a distinctly taller add-on for the shorter / 'taller' 'highway' end.

Grossly over simplifying .... which is less a sin here for looking @ FE then other..... well sorta' on a first pass anyway.... you have;

....'basically' within acceptable difference, a 7th that equals the old 5th ( 1.00 x 3.17 V. 1.00 x 3.14 ) , an eighth that acts as bridge and is just a little more sporty than the old 6th when final drive effects are considered and then finally, the 'new' 9th of 0.620 - which really corresponds nicely to what a more modern but also not maxed out for FE - group of modern MTs provides.

Here,

6MT Gasser ( 3.818 - xxxx - 0.614 ) X 3.65

6MT Diesel ( 3.550 - xxxx - 0.610 ) X 3.65

Not a whole lot of difference - all could be considered inside of normal Gasser versus Diesel range and or 'generic tuning' range.

_____


6CAT Gasser ( 4.449 - xxx - 1.00 - 0.742 ) X 3.14

9CAT Diesel ( 4.690 - xxx - 1.00 - 0.750 0.620 ) X 3.17

So looking @ top gear times final drive ( but still ignoring all the other that matters - like the Torque Converters in the ATs - which is 'ok' because you just assume they are locked - even if designed and equipped with constant slip ) you get;

6MT Gasser = 2.2411

6MT Diesel = 2.2265

6CAT Gasser = 2.32988

9CAT Diesel = 1.9654

Big difference for the Nine SP CAT versus all the rest.

One other thing - the Nine Speed CAT is likely to have identical or very close to identical gear ratios in all other applications although as always, Torque Converters and Final Drives can and will vary - even if less so than in the past especially for the TCs.
 
#18 ·
Say you have two cars, one is a diesel that gets 50 mpg and the other is gasoline and get 40 mpg
over 100,000 miles the diesel uses 2,000 gals while the gasoline uses 2,500 gals.
Given the higher cost of diesel the actual savings in fuel costs is a lot less than expected.

Gasoline: 2,500 x $2.27/gal = $5,675

Diesel: 2,000 x $2.48/gal = $4,960 (-$715)

Admittedly, that's based on highway fuel economy but you have to wonder
about the fuel savings achieved by paying thousands of dollars up front...