The market isn't as distinct as you suggest... the Accord and Malibu square off for the same huge portion of the market. You can split hairs and say one is conservative and one is sporty, but most big sedan consumers don't break the vehicles down into two columns like that.vcs2600 said:It's hard to compare these two cars because they're aiming for different markets. The Malibu is more of a conservative, luxerious design to compete mainly with the Camry. The Accord is more of an aggressive sports sedan. Might need to wait until the next G6 to do an apples-to-apples.
Oh, I agree there's a ton of buyer cross-over. I'm just saying the Chevy designers were trying to do A, while the Honda designers were trying to do B. So which one you might like the best depends a lot on your own personal ideals for a car. While I find the Malibu very attractive, it doesn't strike me as the the kind of car that I myself would buy (that is, if they sell a manual).paul8488 said:The market isn't as distinct as you suggest... the Accord and Malibu square off for the same huge portion of the market. You can split hairs and say one is conservative and one is sporty, but most big sedan consumers don't break the vehicles down into two columns like that.
No one ever claimed our polls are scientific. They're just for fun... and it's totally valid to give our opinions on pictures for these cars. Just as we can say if we prefer a picture of one woman over another, we can say if we prefer a picture of one car over another.ifcar said:No comparison can be made without, at the very least, reading a review of both cars. None are out yet. No one here driven both, read reviews of both (real reviews, not just "first drives"), or even sat in both or seen them both in person.
When you judge by the pictures and by the badges on a GM site, is the poll even necessary to choose a winner?
That flys in the face of everything people like ifcar stand for. If you can't quantify a choice, then you must be wrong.paul8488 said:No one ever claimed our polls are scientific. They're just for fun... and it's totally valid to give our opinions on pictures for these cars. Just as we can say if we prefer a picture of one woman over another, we can say if we prefer a picture of one car over another.
DuSpinnst said:Considering the Accord is nearly as large as the outgoing Impala. I have a tough time saying it competes in the mid-size segment anymore.
It has basically moved from a Camry competitor to an Avalon competitor. So that means, the Taurus, Impala, Accord, Avalon, Maxima, and 300 all compete now.
The Accord isn't a Fusion, Malibu, Sebring competitor anymore. Honda has effectively left that market.
in terms of exterior size, it's 194 inches long, only 2-5 inches longer than the Fusion/Camry/Altima/Malibu (all between 189-192 inches long, with the Malibu as the biggest in the group). the Impala/Taurus/Avalon are both 3-6 inches longer than the Accord (197-200). given that it's historically in the Camry's class, and it's still just as close to the Camry in size as the Avalon, and comes with the 4-cyl engines of a small/midsized car... i'd say it's still a Camry (and Malibu) fighter, just it's the biggest in the class for right now.DuSpinnst said:Considering the Accord is nearly as large as the outgoing Impala. I have a tough time saying it competes in the mid-size segment anymore.
It has basically moved from a Camry competitor to an Avalon competitor. So that means, the Taurus, Impala, Accord, Avalon, Maxima, and 300 all compete now.
The Accord isn't a Fusion, Malibu, Sebring competitor anymore. Honda has effectively left that market.
Must be the year of the Vampirelikearock00 said:Well then don't even look at the G8!
![]()