GM Inside News Forum banner

It's Official - Ford to kill Taurus X, Mercury Sable

8.6K views 75 replies 38 participants last post by  ausrutherford  
#1 ·
Amy Wilson
Automotive News
December 4, 2008 - 4:40 pm ET

DETROIT -- It's official: The Ford Taurus X crossover and Mercury Sable sedan will die early next year.

Ford Motor Co. has notified dealers to prepare their final orders for the two vehicles before production ends in the spring.

Ford spokesman Mark Schirmer told Automotive News today that Ford will assemble the final Taurus X in March. The final Sable will roll off the assembly line at the end of April.

"Basically, it's the last call at the bar," Schirmer said.

Automotive News had reported that the two vehicles were expected to be discontinued, based on information from suppliers and industry product analysts. But Ford had not confirmed the decision until now.
 
#2 ·
anyone who says that merc will be saved should read this as the last nail in its coffin. This wil leave them with the mariner, millan, and mountaineer. Sad, I like the styling of the sable better then the taurus.
 
#5 ·
Mountaineer is dead in the summertime.

Mercury will be a 2 model brand for a year - just like Buick was before Enclave.

The new models are coming - but as I said - this is Mercury's last chance .. if they cannot use it as a test bed for some non-treditional EU models (S-max) - Mercury is gone.

Igor
 
#8 ·
That's what they said about Saturn and look what might happen to them now!
 
#7 ·
I thought the Taurus X was dead already. :rolleyes: And to me Mercury's been on borrowed time for along time. The difference between Buick and Mercury is, Cadillac is further up the food chain than Lincoln. Also the CTS and STS are RWD, while Buick remains FWD. Add to that the huge styling differences that exist with Buick and Cadillac and are NOT there with Mercury and Lincoln (or Ford itself, for that matter) and Mercury has been redundant for some time now. As I said before, Ford killed Mercury in Canada 8 or 9 years ago and guess what...nobody noticed. :unsure: It'sll be similar when it happnes in the US.
 
#12 ·
Ford never did right by these cars, which are quality products. The Freestyle/Taurus X, if done right from the beginning (with sharper styling and the correct powerplant right off the bat) could have obviated the need for both the Flex and the Edge. In many ways (less weight, better dynamics) it is superior to those vehicles. I know people will argue that they don't overlap- but there aren't that many ways to slice this particular pie IMHO. The Edge fills a rapidly shrinking niche, and the Flex should have been a quality minivan. Honda and Toyota are making do quite nicely without so many "crossovers."

As for the Sable, both it and the Taurus look a good deal worse than the original Five Hundred/Montego IMHO. Both feature gaudy chrome accents, huge wheel well gaps (esp. in AWD models- noticeably worse than the FH/Montego) and front ends that look tacked on (which they were) rather than integrated with the design.

An object lesson on why it is important to get a vehicle completely right at launch.
 
#14 · (Edited)
Honda and Toyota are making do quite nicely without so many "crossovers."
Honda
CR-V
Element
Odessey
Pilot
Ridgeline

Toyota
Rav 4
Venza
FJ Cruiser
Highlander
Sienna
4Runner
Sequoia
Land Cruiser

Ya, they hardly have any. Especially Toyota. :rolleyes:

Ford
Escape
Edge
Flex
Taurus X (dead)
Explorer
Expedition
 
#32 ·
Its sad but if i didnt know about the other vehicles coming into the mercury lineup from the euro portfolio it would be more sad.

I've never owned a mercury but I have alot of respect for Ford keeping them and hopefully doing a total restructure.
 
#36 ·
It's a shame the Taurus X/Freestyle never sold in numbers. I really like the quasi-station wagon styling, and it's the ONE Ford product I would definitely own.

What a pity.
 
#37 ·
We love ours. You can get one used cheap for several more years to come. You could probably buy one "New" in eighteen months in some parts of the country.
 
#40 ·
I think the future of Mercury is still nebulous and depends largely on the economic climate. Mercury's new product mission has been dubbed as premium small car, which probably means it will offer products that don't overlap with Lincoln. Lincoln is expanding its roll and will carry enough market share to keep dealers viable, but Mercury currently serves a valuable roll in the Ford customer portfolio which will likely be absorbed by Lincoln and Ford. I don't know how much farther Mercury's product expansion will go beyond the one promised C-segment product. I suspect the ultimate goal is to do without Mercury and get down to Ford and Lincoln.

One thing is for sure, Mercury is profitable and a stabilizing force under the Lincoln brand, there no benefit to closing it up right now. However, when it comes to shuttering brands, this is the best way to do it.
 
#43 ·
Not a big surprise... Ford never had confidence in the Freestyle, even if it is much nicer, appears more practical and uses less fuel than the shed-shaped Edge. That's too bad, it could have started the renaissance of the station wagon in the US, now it's up to some other automaker to exploit the opportunity (listening GM?)

The Sable was good as Montego - while the 500 was a smack in the face of Ford (should've been a RWD Ford Falcon or Fairlane or both), the Montego was just what a large Mercury should be.

This does indeed seem like another step in the "killing Mercury softly" plan by A. Mullaly, though it is not entirely out of sync with the "Merc as small car brand" thing. Time will tell...
 
#46 ·
Mercury can survive if Ford is willing to commit to it. I recently bought a Mariner Premier for my wife and she loves it. Now with another of Chicago's infamous snowy winters beginning, she's enjoying it even more. It's loaded with options including V6 engine, 4WD, heated leather seats, sunroof, and satellite/CD stereo. This is our third Mercury; our two previous cars (a Topaz and a Marauder) were both incredibly reliable vehicles.

A close friend of mine has a similar Escape. While mechanically identical, the Ford is clearly aimed more at the male buyer and the Mercury the female. The details on the Ford make it look more rugged while the Mercury's are classier and more upscale. Ford has done a good job of separating the two by marketing them differently. Much the same could be said about the Fusion/Milan twins. Apart from those two car models, though, Ford needs to separate these two brands much, much more. I had hoped the Taurus X would be dropped from the Ford line and redone for Mercury as the replacement or the Mountaineer. With Lincoln coming out with the MKT soon, Ford would need to market them to different buyers. For the same reason, Mercury needs to differentiate the Milan from the MKZ if they are to be continued to be sold on the same showroom floor, especially since you can now get the 3.5L V6 in the Mercury. Perhaps Milan could be marketed as sportier than the luxurious Lincoln by offering it as a two door, too. An upscale compact with a hybrid drivetrain optional would be a great idea as well.
 
#55 ·
especially since you can now get the 3.5L V6 in the Mercury. Perhaps Milan could be marketed as sportier than the luxurious Lincoln by offering it as a two door, too. An upscale compact with a hybrid drivetrain optional would be a great idea as well.

Actually the '10 Milan just has the duratec 30 with 240 HP like the regular non sport Fusion. In fact, its the only car without the option of Duratec 35 out of the cd3 triplets, kind of a shame. Thank god Ford didnt give a hybrid version to the MKZ, that would kill the Milan and Mercury.
 
#67 ·
I know, I know. I went to Lincoln's site. I also know I read somewhere the Town Car was dead sometime in 2008. I guess not. Or maybe it's a zombie! :eek: