GM Inside News Forum banner

Impala LTZ Review: "Almost nothing but positives in my notebook"

9.4K views 70 replies 40 participants last post by  gmwsag  
#1 · (Edited)
Impala takes a big leap
With makeover, Chevrolet brings iconic American sedan to next level.
By Pete Szilagyi
THE AMERICAN-STATESMAN
Saturday, July 22, 2006

Image


The Chevrolet Impala has returned, big time, after years of uninspired design and performance.

To be sure, Impalas by the hundreds of thousands moved off dealer lots over the past decade (many to rental car companies), but the cars did little to honor the Impala's status as an iconic American car.

The made-over Impala, introduced as an '06 model, will soon be at dealers in an even fresher '07 trim. Now almost as mainstream technically as top-line Japanese competitors, such as the Toyota Camry and Honda Accord, the Impala is a package that traditional domestic sedan buyers will love and cynics will have to at least respect.

I came away from a week in a blue Impala LTZ with almost nothing but positives in my notebook. An exception was my impression that the Impala's cabin seemed crowded for a car just 4 inches shorter than Cadillac's big DTS sedan and 11 inches longer than the Camry. Other Impala demerits: Side view mirrors are too small, and steering felt vague at highway speeds.

Image


Shoppers with an eye for design will deem the Impala pleasing and contemporary though not daring, with paint and trim that's a tad too glossy. Those with calculators will conclude that the $21,000 to $29,000-ish price range is a value after dealers subtract the discounts.

Except for some interior trim, nothing about the Impala seems cheap or chintzy, and General Motors cars have a fairly laudable reliability record of late.

The Impala SS with 5.3-liter V-8 and 303 horsepower tops the line with 18-inch wheels and tires, a rear spoiler and dual exhaust for a nod to the NASCAR set.

My LTZ test model, a notch lower in price and power, had GM's 3.9-liter, 242-horsepower V-6, well-endowed with torque at middle engine speeds where it's needed for comfortable urban driving. Standard in Impala LS and LT is a 3.5-liter V-6, with 211 horsepower.

For 2007, the 3.9-liter engine will use Active Cylinder Management, which shuts down half the cylinders in easy driving to save fuel. Only the base 3.5-liter engine has E-85 fuel capability.

The test LTZ was nimbler and quicker than I expected, without the floaty, too-soft suspension feel of the previous Impala. Handling and maneuverability were competent for a large family sedan. Braking was unremarkable but effective.

Most other cars in this class use 5- or 6-speed automatics; the Impala has just four speeds, though it functions well, and the 3.9's fuel estimates are decent (though they are possibly not achievable).

Image


Except for less rear seat legroom than expected, the Impala was comfortable and inviting, with pretty leather seats, easy-to-use controls and more attractive cabin materials and design than any Impala in recent history. Unlike other sedans, the rear seat flips and folds for cargo-loading flexibility.

Source: http://www.statesman.com/life/content/life/stories/cars/07/22szilagyi.html

Image
 
#2 ·
If I am allowed to be picky...

1. GM has been improving interior design. Its just that the plastics on the doors and the fabric of the carpet and ceilings still feels cheap.

2. Really hate that steering wheel. Just comes off as rather old and boat-like.

3. While smooth, durable, and no real issues. The four-speed auto is hopefully on its last legs.

4. The high-rounded roof design is boring, so are the front head-lights and grill. Then again, this is the segment. But while the Accord and Camry are bland, they still appear younger and more aggressive than the Impala.

5. As a positive, I really like the look and feel of that corporate radio. Its much better than the ones in Toyotas and Hondas.

6. Toyota interiors are perhaps the most overated interiors ever.
 
#3 ·
The Impala is a nice car but certainely not a segment leader, there are a lot of things where it falls behind, I prefer the GP.
 
#4 · (Edited)
Butz said:
The Impala is a nice car but certainely not a segment leader, there are a lot of things where it falls behind, I prefer the GP.
I prefer the GXP to the SS, but the obsolete 3800 has to go in the lower trim models. At least the Impala's engines have been revised and improved within the last 5 years. The 3800 naturally aspirated has seen no real improvements since my 2000 Bonneville (althought the supercharged one did get a boost), aside from some lame emissions stuff.

The Impala base model has over the GP:

1. E-85 capability
2. VVT enhanced (first cam-in-block VVT application in the industry) 211hp 3.5L engine (224 in 2007?) - much less rough running than the old 3800, revs better, has had a host of improvements to enhance reliability over its old 3400 ancestor.
3. A less awkward looking dash
4. Flip & fold rear seats (what convinced me not to get a wagon instead)
5. Bench seat option (never saw this but it might be available on the GP)
6. Sharper, less 1990's funky pontiac rear end
7. More modern - less swoopy 1990's looking profile.
8. More volume Chevy discounts - usually better "deals"
9. Whatever other enhancements happened under the hood - like throttle-by-wire, improved handling geometry, air bags -- all of the stuff that happened to the W-body between the release of the redesigned Grand Prix and the 2006 Impala. (Don't have a list)

Both have grilles that don't fully satisfy me - the Impalas is a bit too bland, and the Grand Prix non-GXP grille looks like a Chipmunk (the GXP chrome rings soften out the buck-tooth look). I think the Monte Carlo air dam looks much nicer than the stock Impala one.
 
#5 ·
I haven't driven a 2007 Impala, but the 2006 Impala that I spent several months with was no fun at all.

From the pic in this thread, the interior is still truly horrid. The fake wood looks out of place in this car. The '06 I drove had terribly numb handling. I'm convinced GM has no clue what handling truly means.

There's no excuse for the Impala's styling. Oh, many folks out here will argue about how its 'inoffensive' or 'supposed to be plain', but it looks like a 1998 Lumina.

I expect a class-leading vehicle from GM, in every respect ... styling, technology, end efficiency. The industry leader should be continually sending its competition back to the drawing board. Instead, I think the competition is giggling at the Impala.

Sorry if I sound upset, but darnit, I want GM to take some serious strides! Come on, GM ... lead dammit lead!
 
#8 ·
Ming said:
Both have grilles that don't fully satisfy me - the Impalas is a bit too bland, and the Grand Prix non-GXP grille looks like a Chipmunk (the GXP chrome rings soften out the buck-tooth look). I think the Monte Carlo air dam looks much nicer than the stock Impala one.
I always thought Pontiac grills look like a camel toe. I just picked up an 06 Impala SS and and it has an advantage in every area over the GXP except for suspension, but I will be putting the struts, springs and bars off the GXP on my impala pretty soon. The GXP has larger brakes that are cross drilled but from what I have seen the Impala stops better even though the SS weighs more.
 
#9 ·
Nelson Kyle K said:
I think that new Impala is a nice car, but it certainly not as cutting edge car like the Dodge Charger or the Chrysler 300. I feel that it's another car that is getting lost in the shuffle out on the street.
Have you ever drove or even ridden in a Charger? Great car on the outside but the inside is absolutely terrible.
 
#10 ·
I liked the Impala that I drove, a 06 with the 3900.

I guess that some people's complaint is that the Impala isnt exciting enough, its a no thrills people mover and it does that extremely well.

If Im buying a V-6 Id go with the Impala 3900 but if I were to buy the top of the line then I would pick the GP GXP.

GM please hurry up and replace the 4 speed autos with 6 speed autos.
 
#14 ·
ByTheLake said:
I haven't driven a 2007 Impala, but the 2006 Impala that I spent several months with was no fun at all.

From the pic in this thread, the interior is still truly horrid. The fake wood looks out of place in this car. The '06 I drove had terribly numb handling. I'm convinced GM has no clue what handling truly means.

There's no excuse for the Impala's styling. Oh, many folks out here will argue about how its 'inoffensive' or 'supposed to be plain', but it looks like a 1998 Lumina.

I expect a class-leading vehicle from GM, in every respect ... styling, technology, end efficiency. The industry leader should be continually sending its competition back to the drawing board. Instead, I think the competition is giggling at the Impala.

Sorry if I sound upset, but darnit, I want GM to take some serious strides! Come on, GM ... lead dammit lead!
1. Whose brother in law has the fake wood contract? Why must makers put in such tacky, obviously-phony junk?
2. The handling complaints surface every year in most magazine tests. Perhaps GM has no clue...oh, you said that!
3. "Styling?" Excuse my :rant: but I MUST write MT about a new annual contest: Unmarked cop car of the year, UCCY. Impala is right up there with the 500 and Lacrost in the running for the FBI contract.
4. :soapbox: WHEN WHEN WHEN will a GM family sedan win or even come close to winning a mag comparo? :brick
5. Lead? Leadership? :hyper: ;) :p:
 
#15 ·
mikehamm45 said:
If I am allowed to be picky...

1. GM has been improving interior design. Its just that the plastics on the doors and the fabric of the carpet and ceilings still feels cheap.

2. Really hate that steering wheel. Just comes off as rather old and boat-like.

3. While smooth, durable, and no real issues. The four-speed auto is hopefully on its last legs.

4. The high-rounded roof design is boring, so are the front head-lights and grill. Then again, this is the segment. But while the Accord and Camry are bland, they still appear younger and more aggressive than the Impala.

5. As a positive, I really like the look and feel of that corporate radio. Its much better than the ones in Toyotas and Hondas.

6. Toyota interiors are perhaps the most overated interiors ever.
I'd add to that list that when sitting in the passenger seat (on the cars with a split bench seat), the passenger seat is very low and can't be raised.

Besides that, I think the Impala, especially in base form...is one of the best cars available for the money.
 
#16 ·
Guys I'm pretty sure we can agree this car for the most part is a stopgap. They had to do an extensive redesign in order to stay competitive, but I'm sure with a Zeta based Impala coming out in next years it will be class leading.
 
#17 ·
It is absolutely amazing how fast GM is progressing! I remember thinking so fondly of the Impala interior in comparison to the outgoing design. Then I saw the Aura, and was completely blown away. NOW we have a little crossover called the Acadia, and it makes the Impala's interior look pathetic.

Great to hear the Impala get such a positive review though!
 
#18 ·
LAMRONH said:
...
4. :soapbox: WHEN WHEN WHEN will a GM family sedan win or even come close to winning a mag comparo? :brick...
GM will have class-leading family sedans when they set to the task of producing such product. Unfortunately, they haven't been interested in doing so for decades. Most GMIer's are very well aware GM's designers and engineers possess the ability to knock Honda and Toyota on their asses, with perhaps the Lambda's being the latest example of an A effort in building nicely designed, seemingly well-engineered, top-notch product.

I've never accepted "stopgaps" as a viable strategy. The indirect cost to GM's reputation is not worth the half-assed effort. Do it right the first time.
 
#21 ·
Drove Gramp's LTZ two weeks ago when they came up from St. Louis. I was almost stunned at how really nice the interior was finished off. Usually you can drag your eyes over something that screams cheap and really the only glaring omission was a "PRNDL" indicator on the floor shift.

Honestly, the whole car felt like it would last an eternity, if you properly maintained it. There in lay the real progress for GM: They have learned that substance is something one percieves from the first touch and the Impala gave me good vibes. Everything you touch feels nice and sturdy, if mabye a little lifeless in the style department. It's such a huge improvement over the previous Impala, it doesn't even feel like the same company made them both.

My wish list:

An end to the hallmark W-body "ker-thunk" over sharp angled pavement irregularities.

A tad more communication of what's going on at the tire contact patches
during moderate cornering.

PRNDL indicator.

Nav.

Auto Air-con.

Now that the engineering mojo is back online, I think that the next models
will put an end to the stopgap products.
 
#22 ·
Ming said:
5. Bench seat option (never saw this but it might be available on the GP)
Not offered in the GP since the GP is supposed to be "sporty"

Ming said:
8. More volume Chevy discounts - usually better "deals"
The GP incentives generally match the Impala (and LaCrosse). The Impala is just less expensive to begin with.

Ming said:
9. Whatever other enhancements happened under the hood - like throttle-by-wire, improved handling geometry, air bags -- all of the stuff that happened to the W-body between the release of the redesigned Grand Prix and the 2006 Impala. (Don't have a list)
Actually, when the new GP came out in 2004 I believe it was actually the first car - at least with GM - to feature throttle-by-wire. GP has also always boasted it's "wide-track" stance which does make it handle better than the Imapala (at least the last gen of Impala). The GP was also the only W-body to offer stabilitrak and magnasteer until the LaCrosse came along. Both the stabilitrak and magnasteer are tuned for performance driving - which basically lets the driver get away with having a little more fun before the safety systems kick in. The GP was also the first GM car to offer the fold-flat front passenger seat plus a few other things that only came onboard other cars since the 2005 model year began. I may be wrong, but I seem to remember the GP being the first of the W's to offer head curtain airbags.
 
#23 ·
LAMRONH said:
1. Whose brother in law has the fake wood contract? Why must makers put in such tacky, obviously-phony junk?
I seem to remember something about it being mandated that real wood not be used in vehicles because of the way it splinters in crashes. The fake wood is supposedly engineered to cause less injury.
 
#26 ·
dlr said:
For as many faults as people say the Impala has, not many sedans outsell it.
True, but what percentage of the sales are fleet sales? And as far as the true retail sales, what percentage were based on an employee discount?

GM will have a hit when it gets retail demand, not fleet demand.