GM Inside News Forum banner

Commando: Hendrick Dynamics wants to put Jeep Wranglers back on the battlefield

3.2K views 13 replies 9 participants last post by  smith7629  
#1 ·
Hendrick wants to put Jeep Wranglers back on the battlefield
Jan 25th 2016
AutoBlog.com

The Jeep Wrangler could be headed back to the battlefield. According to reports, negotiations are currently under way with the US Army to adapt the iconical American off-roader for military use. The Wranglers would serve as inexpensive, lightweight, unarmored vehicles that could be more easily airlifted into remote locations than costlier, heavier, and bulkier options.

The proposal is not being fielded by the Jeep brand itself or its parent company Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, but by Hendrick Dynamics. The Charlotte-based offshoot of NASCAR racing team Hendrick Motorsports calls its modified Wrangler the Hendrick Commando. Instead of the 3.6-liter Pentastar V6 found in most US-market Wranglers, the Commando version employs the 2.8-liter diesel four built by VM Motori, modified to run on any type of diesel fuel or on JP-8 jet fuel to maximize its deployment versatility and comply with the Army's Single Fuel mandate of 2012.

It would also support a variety of modular attachments for specific jobs, ranging from machine gun mounts and counter-mine rakes to radar arrays and advanced communications equipment. Hendrick says the Commando could also be deployed by helicopter or in cargo planes. And because it's based on a civilian platform, the Commando would also benefit from the latest advancements introduced by its manufacturer, the parts and service network already in place, and the thorough testing that's already gone into developing the Wrangler for civilian use.

CONTINUE AT LINK ABOVE

Image
 
#2 · (Edited)
Seems like a great (and obvious) idea for a light-weight offering to use for scouting, base-use, patrolling, etc.

If this takes off, I could only imagine that FCA would make a move to either buy their operations or mimic the idea.

As an aside, Fiat used to have military-grade offerings through Iveco years ago. They had a product called the Iveco Massif (that itself was based off a Spanish-sourced Santana/Land Rover-derived off-road vehicle). It's exterior was designed by Giugiaro and it was popular with many military outfits around the world. Point is, there once was a part of the empire that built military grade products --- just as AM General did for AMC back in the day. If FCA decided, at some point, to re-enter this market, there are folks from both-sides of the Atlantic that have experience in this discipline. I'd imagine it would be profitable too.
 
#6 · (Edited)
Yes. If this is used for multiple roles, then it would need the option. Especially if it's used in the field for non-combat operations.
Right... Because all the troops want to be riding around in an un-armored truck when they deploy. What are they thinking?
Why not? Should be cheaper for the tax payer as well. Soldiers are willing to die, the armor should be a non-issue.
The title is misleading, but this isn't really for battlefield use. I think this is supposed to be mostly for patrolling, inter-base use, sentry/checkpoint use, and perhaps "light-convoy" duty. This isn't something they would use for advancing in the field or as a direct-engagement apparatus.
 
#7 ·
I thought the Wrangler was already seeing military use in other countries...N/M I clicked the article and that was mentioned

BTW this was shown in the basement of Cobo at NAIAS
 
#9 ·
I wonder how high one would fly when it runs over an IED. Seriously, there was a lot of running around to armor the vehicles used in the Middle East. The Jeep was a great vehicle when I was in Korea but the landscape of war has changed. Well, that is why generals exist; to outfit the troops.
 
#12 ·
Outfitting a civilian vehicle has worked before. Pretty sure the MI National Guard still has them

Image