GM Inside News Forum banner

BusinessWeek review of '07 Cadillac SRX

4K views 25 replies 25 participants last post by  mkaresh  
#1 ·
Cadillac's Crossover

Cadillac's SRX delivers (finally) on a luxury interior but still lacks the sex appeal of the Escalade

by Thane Peterson
http://www.businessweek.com/autos/content/dec2006/bw20061213_653214.htm





Image
Editor's Rating:
Image

The Good: Panoramic sunroof, third row of seats, cash rebates
The Bad: So-so fuel efficiency, unattractive exterior
The Bottom Line: A luxury station wagon on steroids
Reader Reviews



Cadillac may be the best thing General Motors (GM) has going for it. Even as the parent company struggles financially, the Cadillac division continues to compete head-on with formidable rivals such as BMW and Toyota's (TM) Lexus by focusing on quality, features and value (what a revolutionary idea!). It also believes in Japanese-style continuous improvement of its products—a concept essential to today's subject, the '07 Cadillac SRX.

The SRX is a crossover vehicle, which means it's in a hot market. Based on the same platform as the CTS, Cadillac's entry-level sedan, it's a light-duty SUV that looks a little like a station wagon on steroids, combining the roominess, off-road capability and cargo space of an SUV with the handling and speediness of a car.

Earlier versions of the SRX, which first hit the market in the 2004 model year, won plaudits from the auto press but got hammered for having a too-chintzy interior. Rather than ignore the criticism and cut the price to boost sales, Cadillac actually fixed the SRX for the '07 model year—noticeably improving the interior. It should have happened sooner, but better late than never.

The result is that the '07 SRX is a cool vehicle in a hot segment with very few faults. The average SRX spends a mere 13 days on a dealer's lot before selling, according to the Power Information Network. Of the competing models in the same price range, only the Acura MDX turns over faster (10 days). The Volvo XC90 sells in an average of 18 days, and the Lexus RX 350 in 25.

If you're tempted by the SRX, it's a great time to buy because GM is offering $2,145 cash rebates on the model through New Year's Day. Cash rebates and low interest rate financing have given Cadillac a big boost lately. The division's overall sales rose 20.3%, to 17,250, in November, though they were off 3.7%, to 204,299 units, for the first 11 months of 2006.

Cadillac's hottest model right now is its behemoth Escalade (see BusinessWeek.com, 11/2/06, "Cadillac's Crown Jewel"), but the SRX is doing well, too. SRX sales were up 9.5% in November, to 1,492 (though for the first 11 months of the year, sales were down 4.9%, to 19,907).
Cadillac also does well in quality ratings, especially when it comes to service. The 2006 SRX only rated 3.5 stars in J.D. Power's 2006 Initial Quality study. But Cadillac ranked No. 3 (behind Lexus and Buick) among all auto makers in terms of customer satisfaction with its dealers' service and No. 2 (behind Jaguar) in terms of customer satisfaction with the overall sales experience. (Like BusinessWeek.com, J.D. Power and the Power Information Network are units of The McGraw-Hill Companies.)

The SRX is fairly spacious but without the wretched excess of a really big SUV like the Escalade. At 195 in. long and 4,300 lbs., the SRX is 28 in. shorter and three-quarters-of-a-ton lighter than the Escalade. It only comes in two trim levels, mainly differentiated by engine size. Your choice is between a 3.6-liter, 255-horsepower V6, which starts at $37,855, or a 4.6-liter, 320-horsepower V8 version that starts at $44,060.

full article: http://www.businessweek.com/autos/content/dec2006/bw20061219_033519.htm?chan=search
 
#2 ·
The SRX has the look-like-a-wagon problem, they should of made it like a mini Escalade. Though the new interior is, imo, better than the Escalade's. The SRX is still a great car, and I wouldn't mind having one.
 
#3 ·
Butz said:
The SRX has the look-like-a-wagon problem, they should of made it like a mini Escalade. Though the new interior is, imo, better than the Escalade's. The SRX is still a great car, and I wouldn't mind having one.
didn't work for lincoln.
 
#4 ·
Butz said:
The SRX has the look-like-a-wagon problem, they should of made it like a mini Escalade. Though the new interior is, imo, better than the Escalade's. The SRX is still a great car, and I wouldn't mind having one.
Does the SRX really have a problem or is this all in our heads? The article even mentions that it's a quick sale. Thats without advertising (when was the last time you saw an SRX ad?). I think the SRX is a fine vehicle that will continue to improve as long as Caddy takes each competitor in stride.
 
#8 ·
I personally love the SRX... just the monetary funds are not in my bank account to afford one right now... if anyone is interested in helping me fulfill this shortcoming then let me know...

Hopeing the best for Cadillac.... GO GM!!!
 
#9 ·
I was most impressed by the short time they spend on dealers' lots. 12 days! Funny thing is, I don't recall seeing the SRX on those stupid "hottest cars" lists, which have as much to do with demand as they do with supply. We always saw the Solstice and Sky on those, but if the SRX is there now, great for Cadillac. They did do a great job with the new interior.
 
#11 ·
I really like the SRX, especially the new interior. But for the cost of a V8 and the penalty of the bad gas mileage, I would rather get an Escalade. Do I need either, no. But if I am giong to get bad mileage, I am at least going to be able to tow something heavy with it. Otherwise I will stick with a large sedan for a daily driver
 
#17 ·
Butz said:
The SRX has the look-like-a-wagon problem, they should of made it like a mini Escalade. Though the new interior is, imo, better than the Escalade's. The SRX is still a great car, and I wouldn't mind having one.
Honestly, I have an SRX and love the wagon shape. I despise the Escalade, so we'll have to agree to disagree on that topic. :)

My '06 SRX interior is the pits, though, so I'm glad it's been revised. I worry, however, that GM is still stuck on the mindset that luxury = 'plastic wood all over the place'. I cannot stand the plastic wood in my SRX interior, and its all over the place.

I also agree that the fuel economy is poor. Granted, I have the Northstar V8, but driving at a steady 70 MPH with just one passenger yields about 17 MPG on the highway, at a steady speed. Not too good.
 
#19 ·
My mother-in-law drives an SRX with the V6. It's all the engine you need with that car, and you skip the price and fuel mileage penalties. Cadillac should have pushed the V6 models more from the start instead of trying to cash in on the V8's.

It's a great car and the new interior looks awesome.
 
#20 ·
ByTheLake said:
Honestly, I have an SRX and love the wagon shape. I despise the Escalade, so we'll have to agree to disagree on that topic. :)

My '06 SRX interior is the pits, though, so I'm glad it's been revised. I worry, however, that GM is still stuck on the mindset that luxury = 'plastic wood all over the place'. I cannot stand the plastic wood in my SRX interior, and its all over the place.

I also agree that the fuel economy is poor. Granted, I have the Northstar V8, but driving at a steady 70 MPH with just one passenger yields about 17 MPG on the highway, at a steady speed. Not too good.
I actually upgraded from an 06 to an o7 (on order) because of the new interior. Like many on here, tho, I can take advantage of some employee pricing.
 
#22 ·
asim said:
I love the new interior. Well at least it is a lot better than the old outgoing model. The SRX has always been a pretty good vehicle, but now it kinda lives up to it's price point with the refresh of the interior and such.
I agree, it can stand on it's own two feet now..the problem is it's now 3 years later and the exterior is getting dated...fast.
 
#23 ·
Cadillac did a GREAT job with the SRX's new interior. It just soldifies the SRX's position as Top of Class. GM is going to have a lot of Top in Class products. :cool:
 
#24 ·
Randle2I said:
Does the SRX really have a problem or is this all in our heads? The article even mentions that it's a quick sale. Thats without advertising (when was the last time you saw an SRX ad?). I think the SRX is a fine vehicle that will continue to improve as long as Caddy takes each competitor in stride.
The problem is total sales. Caddy sells about 20K of these a year. GM projected 60K+ a year. Lexus is clobbering Caddy in this segment and GM has had to invest MORE CASH in the SRX for the new interior. Sales need to pick up fast. I applaud GM for fixing the inside. Time to fix the outside.
 
#26 ·
GMsElite said:
They seem to like the interior when I read the review but listing the interior "unattractive" as a con suggests otherwise. Whats up with that?
Read it again. They list the exterior as unattractive.

GM could well be torn about whether to develop a second-generation SRX. On the one hand, Lexus and Acura do very well in this segment. On the other, they've lost a ton of money on the first-gen SRX, because it's been among the slowest seller in the segment.

As for the quick selling stat, either Power Information Network has a problem with its data or (more likely) the reporter did a sloppy job of looking up the number. Inventories have been high from the beginning. Automotive News reports that days-supply on the SRX was 94 days on December 1. For the MDX, the stat was 29.

The reviews have been good. But even with the revised interior, the interior is tighter than people expect in an SUV and the exterior has never been a stength. Even with these weaknesses, I think Cadillac would have had better luck with it if they'd had a higher-performance variant that took advantage of the relatively low center of gravity to truly offer a class-leading driving experience.

My full SRX review