What did we change...and why?
When will it be changed back?
When will it be changed back?
Exactly, GM should be commended for creating an oil spec to meet new requirements without full synthetic. However, adding a license fee and royalty to every quart sold is disingenuous and a bit of a sham.That's the negative way to look at it I suppose.
GM needs an oil that will last longer than regular oil yet doesn't cost as much as full synthetic. That is what Dexos job is. Having said that, I don't know how much a Dexos oil will cost however trying to convert your entire customer base to an oil twice the price of the current one would be the facepalm of a lifetime.
And if the royalty fee was as extravagant as some people make it out to be, Shell and others would be saying no to Dexos.
Damn right they better.. This is No way to build a new reputation for your company. I had heard of this issue but never personally worked on one as of yet. I'm still friends with local Chevrolet dealership mechanics and they've mentioned the same things stated in this thread. Namely, GM cheaped out on engine parts and they personally wouldn't own one of these motors. That's not good at all.. Information travels Fast in this day and age which kills your companies reputation and sales. GM stepping over dollars to save pennies again.. The bean counting has to stop! General Motors should have the best, most reliable, longest lasting trouble free motors that money can buy in their vehicles. You don't cheap out on stuff like this. I've done hundreds of gasket repairs over the years on GM engines and every time I do one I still get pissed off that the bean counters were allowed to go over an engineers head on the issue. It killed their reputation for many customers who will never return to GM again..The "NEW GM" ought to fix this right away and not make every customer with a failure bring it in. They had better not treat it like the Head bolt issue and the intake manifold issue and numerous other issues like "OLD GM". In the past, problems like this first would be denied, then blamed on the customer and then basically "you bought it it is your problem" attitude (if it is out of warranty). If it is still in warranty then reasons to deny warranty will have to be created.
I hope for "NEW GM"s sake they do the right ting and proactively recall these and repair/replace the timing chains on all the 3.6L's
Dang union engineer and bean counters......I've done hundreds of gasket repairs over the years on GM engines and every time I do one I still get pissed off that the bean counters were allowed to go over an engineers head on the issue. It killed their reputation for many customers who will never return to GM again..
Overhead, that's funny, almost as funny as legacy not material costs... Ha Ha Oh well, it's all covered by Uncle Sam.I think a lot of that is overhead and legacy costs, not material costs.
For some reason GM can't resist squeezing the last $.50 out of every part on the vehicle. The result is premature failure and disillusioned customers and decreasing marketshare. The end is bankruptcy! Again!FanofDurant, I agree, GM should do it right the first time, by producing superior products that can run 200k miles without failure. It wouldn't cost much to use the best gaskets, materials, parts and the like, but the result could be amazing. A GM car that just keeps running, and running and running. No engine failures. No transmission failures. A/C blow ice cubes forever. It can be done for far less than it costs to repair the messes they caused.
More than that. Didn't GM have alot of intake gasket problems with pretty much every OHV V6 engine of the late '90's to early/mid '00's? The 3100's, 3400's and 3800's (except for the supercharged version I think)? It seems like I remember reading some ppl with the newer 3900 V6's having the same issue.Of course... At the beginning with the NorthStar head bolt fiasco it was the customers fault for not servicing the cooling system soon enough... Funny thing was that even internet forum savvy customers who serviced their coolant every YEAR still had the head bolts fail... Just about everyone now agrees that the NorthStars are ticking time bomb just waiting to let go..
Sadly, the NorthStar has been kind of replaced with the 3.6L and now it is becoming clear that these engines are not without there issues too. Its always nice to hear GM's own tech's say that they would never buy a car with this engine in it.
We have several techs on this and other GM forums that I frequent DOCUMENTING that:
1) This is very common
2) Millage in not an issue
3) Oil changes are not an issue and
4) Some have failed within months of purchase, some with as little as 4,000 miles on the clock.
GM needs to get behind this problem and make it right before all of these customers join the disappointed 4.1L, 4.5L and NorthStar Customers.
You continue to try to obfuscate the facts by claiming that the numerous timing chain failures are caused by operating the engine in a "low oil level" condition. There is absolutely no evidence that this is true. GM has admitted to a premature timing chain failure problem on the 3.6 engines and has never once suggested that it is caused by the engine using/burning/leaking/evaporating oil. Give GM credit at least they have taken a "small" (inexpensive) step toward fixing the issue.And the letter back from GM is the reason it took 6 years is because so many idiot owners don't feel the need to either change the oil or if they do they don't check the oil every 1000 or 2000 miles like any sane person should do with their vehicle.
GM should just install an oil level monitor system like BMW had to because Americans are too busy yaking on their cell phones to bother to check their oil level with the dip stick..LOL...and unless there is an APP for their ipod to remind them most people are too "busy" to manually check their own oil and would rather cry about a manufacturering defect...LOL What a lazy group of people..
The reality of it is people, owners of vehicles who have this problem for the most part..(as I am sure there is a percentage of every brand of vehicle that does have some sort of engine issue) don't think there is a reason to check the oil in their 30,40 or 50 thousand dollar vehicle as seen by this thread in many instances. I understand the fast pace life so many americans have these days and I understand the lack of knowledge that requires that 15 seconds of the owners life to be wasted away checking the oil once a month..yet as far as I can tell...
It'll be something I do with every car I own.
Good luck to those who dont' want to check their oil "because they believe its no longer part of owning a "modern" automobile.
I don't mean this to sound rude so please accept my apologies up front..
Its just what I have been taught as normal vehicle maintaince.
Different strokes for different folks..
Good luck my friends.
JB
Most GM vehicles do this. Our '06 Impala SS, which never used a drop of oil in 40,000 miles, surprised us last fall when we started it up and saw a "Low Oil" message on the DIC. It was (shockingly) two quarts low. Naturally, we check it every week now, as the Impala is driven about a 4000 miles per month.GM should just install an oil level monitor system like BMW had to because Americans are too busy yaking on their cell phones to bother to check their oil level with the dip stick..
As a side note, I just changed the timing chain in my '87 Grand National back in November. I figured at 160,000 miles, it was about time.