Read more about the 2018 Chevrolet Equinox Review at AutoGuide.com.At new-vehicle launches it’s always a bit suspicious when an automaker spends more time hyping the drive route or how scenic the lunch stop is than they do about the product they’re introducing. Are they trying to draw attention away from a substandard product?
Indeed, Chevrolet seemed proud of both the area roads and local cuisine we would experience in the Carolinas (yes, both of ‘em) when they invited AutoGuide.com down to Dixie for a taste of their completely overhauled 2018 Equinox.
Strangely, there was no technical lecture or in-depth walkaround of this new compact crossover; the only formal presentation we got was a marketing spiel that was relegated to the second day. Initially it seemed like Chevy was being a bit evasive about their latest crossover model.
But intended or not, this apparent caginess was completely unnecessary. The new Equinox is a solid product and something they have every right to be proud of.
Easier said than done. I'd prefer they get a hot product to market as soon as possible and importantly it's not half baked today.Just don't get why GM can't seem to get all versions of a car launched at the same time. The 9spd should be standard across the line and yes, therE should be a sport mode instead of this learning BS.
the 3.0L lacked torque but in my 2011 cts would pull down 30-31mpg all day long.Agree to a point. The difference in a recent Motor Trend test of the 2017 Malibu with the 2.0T and 9 speed (vs 8 speed previously tested) showed a huge improvement, 0.5 seconds off of 0-60 and also an increase of 1 mpg on the highway. Better (even if a little) mpgs and faster? Yes, please!
But, not worth delaying the launch. The 2.0T will not be a huge seller because not many buyers of these are speed freaks and the likely price premium. Might as well start slinging the 4 cyls. Remember at the launch of the 2010 Equinox, they had the 3.0 V6 which was a terrible motor, actually was happy that they sold it out from under me when I left the dealer to swap cars for the one we were going to trade for it. (always put down a deposit if you are serious) The 4 cyl had 90% of the power and better mileage.
It's only a good thing if it's good design.What you are describing is known as "design language." Chevrolet has standardized on a single design language across a broad spectrum of its passenger car lines. Far from being a problem, this is a very good thing.
To be fair, so far the magazines seem to be getting closer to 32 MPG with the 1.5T than most people did with the 2.4L.So it lost 400 lbs but the 1.5L FWD can still only do 32 mpg highway? Same as the '10 2.4L FWD
And the EPA has tweaked fuel economy rating calculations for 2017.To be fair, so far the magazines seem to be getting closer to 32 MPG with the 1.5T than most people did with the 2.4L.
I sort of agree. There are some that come out looking OK but then certain aspects ruin it like the jowls and side scalloping on the Bu and the bland butt end on the Cruze when the rest of it is not too bad. New Camaro is Bitchin' IMO.I have absolutely no idea why the Chevrolet gang have chosen this ultra-Japanese/Korean styling.
Spark, Cruze, Volt, Sonic, Trax and now Equinox.
The Cruze looks like a last-gen Civic and now the Equinox looks like a water-downed Santa Fe.
Chevrolet needs to get some excitement pumping in those design veins. The Camaro and Corvette are home runs but even the Camaro has had its detractors complaining that it looks too much like the 5th Gen MCU Camaro.
I have neighbors who bought a new CRV in '16 and I hate to say this. It is a rattletrap.Probably more so because the CRV is the leader/benchmark. That's the great thing about being the best in a segment - all that free advertising that further reinforces the car.
The Equinox is growing on me as far as its looks especially in the right colors (like that orange) but like all GM products of late they've left out features I want and therefore are a no-go. Also the better engine at least should have also been available at start and then followed up shortly thereafter by the diesel.Exactly! And about time too. I for one really like the new design language of Chevrolet.
The roll out of the new Equinox is what I would call 'soft'. I agree that Chevrolet could have done better with making all engines available at launch. The Equinox is and will be a huge seller for Chevrolet, I'd rather they delayed launch until most or all engines were ready.
Everything needs to be validated and launched, the finished product as well as every iteration, most of the people are the same team, additionally imagine building every variation for 3,000 dealers, especially on a high volume product, you'd have terrible inventory and selection for months and months and months.Just don't get why GM can't seem to get all versions of a car launched at the same time. The 9spd should be standard across the line and yes, therE should be a sport mode instead of this learning BS.
So it lost 400 lbs but the 1.5L FWD can still only do 32 mpg highway? Same as the '10 2.4L FWD
Many of the old 2.4L FWD model owners were hitting around 28mpg hwy. Not bad but not close to the EPA estimates. The 2018 model's 32 mpg hwy estimate should be much closer to real world numbers.Most said the old ones were not getting the advertised mileage.
Agree. It's just that I wish Chevy's "design language" sucked less.What you are describing is known as "design language." Chevrolet has standardized on a single design language across a broad spectrum of its passenger car lines. Far from being a problem, this is a very good thing.
I sort of agree. There are some that come out looking OK but then certain aspects ruin it like the jowls and side scalloping on the Bu and the bland butt end on the Cruze when the rest of it is not too bad. New Camaro is Bitchin' IMO.
I have neighbors who bought a new CRV in '16 and I hate to say this. It is a rattletrap.
The Equinox is growing on me as far as its looks especially in the right colors (like that orange) but like all GM products of late they've left out features I want and therefore are a no-go. Also the better engine at least should have also been available at start and then followed up shortly thereafter by the diesel.
If I didn't have a 2016 CRV EX-L with a little over 21,000 miles on it, I might have bought your fabrication. It has had no issues of any kind and is a better car than the many new GM company cars I was "encouraged" to drive. I do know GM as well as everyone else makes far better cars now than in the past.I have neighbors who bought a new CRV in '16 and I hate to say this. It is a rattletrap.