LISBON, Portugal — Short of simply building a downsized S-Class, it’s hard to figure how Mercedes-Benz could build a more luxurious E-Class. Sure, the cars are no longer built to a standard; they’re built to a price point. Many of what you’d consider traditional luxury cues as well as the new, high-tech ones are part of optional packages that will quickly hike the sticker price of this $50,000 (or so) car, and lesser luxury brands—even non-luxury ones—are slathering their cars’ interiors with supple leathers and softly padded touchpoints. But with the 2017 Mercedes-Benz E-Class, the German luxury brand once again dominates the segment that is, for lack of a better description, its bread and butter.
The Mercedes E300—the only model confirmed for North America so far—does this seamlessly with the 241-horsepower, 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine, powering the rear wheels through the new 9G-Tronic nine-speed automatic transmission. All-wheel drive is optional with this powertrain, and though we didn’t get time in an AWD turbo-four, it’s fair to say from driving the RWD version that the buttery smooth engine has plenty of power for most E-Class customers. If you live in a northern climate, you can spend the extra money on AWD or on a set of winter tires.
Mercedes hasn’t confirmed a V-6 option for the U.S., though it will certainly come, probably by the end of the year. We spent time behind the wheel of both an E300 and an E400 4Matic, the latter of which is powered by a 329-hp, 354-lb-ft, 3.0-liter turbo V-6 sold in some North American market models. Meanwhile, the latest C-Class comes with both the 2.0-liter turbo engine and a more powerful version of the 3.0-liter turbo V-6, tuned to 362 horsepower and 384 lb-ft. All these turbo V-6s, in the U.S. at least, come with 4Matic all-wheel drive, which reflects Mercedes chasing one of Audi’s chief selling points.
I sat in a CT6 yesterday too. I'm disappointed to say that I left with the same interior impression. Hard plastic on the bottom half of the doors?!?!?! My CTS doesn't even have hard plastic.After sitting in one last night at the auto show, the interior is not in the same class as the E or S. It was a disappointment in my mind.
What is luxury? Changing neon interior lights like a Camaro?I'm not too impressed with the styling but I do like the interior and its technology. Mercedes sets the standard in technology and luxury what the E-Class did just like the S Class.
Mercedes E Class may be ahead of the competition in technology and luxury. Sales have proven that and we all know it is going to outsell everyone but it still comes at a disadvantage against cars with the fun to drive nature like the CTS, XF, GS and Ghibli and appeal factor as well. The CTS is still the lightest car in its class and the decedent model (CT5?) will be even lighter and be a lot better package overall that it is now. I suspect the CTS will get several updates for '17 as well.
?What is luxury? Changing neon interior lights like a Camaro?
Most of the Technology lead from Mercedes is gimmicks, real technological leads, are something like the BMW carbon construction technologies or Cadillac's new chassis construction innovation, or the bolt , i3 or volte innovation in non rare earth metals motors that are more powerful and more efficient.
Mercedes has zero meaningful real technological leads.
You somewhat paraphrase of what I just said about Cadillac's advance structure which is the standard for the competition since it is the lightest and one of the stiffest in its class, however, you can not ignore the fact that Mercedes has very impressive technical innovations with its new generation E class.What is luxury? Changing neon interior lights like a Camaro?
Most of the Technology lead from Mercedes is gimmicks, real technological leads, are something like the BMW carbon construction technologies or Cadillac's new chassis construction innovation, or the bolt , i3 or volte innovation in non rare earth metals motors that are more powerful and more efficient.
Mercedes has zero meaningful real technological leads.
Some of its technology like its advance headlight system and self park with remote key are not cleared thru government regulations yet. But I like these to be cleared so other luxury models introduce them or something similar in the near future.?
Mercedes has been hugely innovative. This vehicle's semi-autonomous tech alone speaks to that.
Really? The CT6 looks pretty good in pictures -- which never happens with Cadillac.After sitting in one last night at the auto show, the interior is not in the same class as the E or S. It was a disappointment in my mind.
But whether not it's allowed in a certain country doesn't negate such innovation.Some of its technology like its advance headlight system and self park with remote key are not cleared thru government regulations yet. But I like these to be cleared so other luxury models introduce them or something similar in the near future.
What innovations? Frankly, there is nothing in it that others do not have.You somewhat paraphrase of what I just said about Cadillac's advance structure which is the standard for the competition since it is the lightest and one of the stiffest in its class, however, you can not ignore the fact that Mercedes has very impressive technical innovations with its new generation E class.
I am not referring neon interior lights, you mentioned it. I did not.
http://www.autoblog.com/2015/07/07/2017-mercedes-benz-e-class-technology-feature-video/What innovations? Frankly, there is nothing in it that others do not have.
Typical old GM stuff. Disjointed/inelegant design, mismatch of good + bad materials, switchgear that looks cheap/like it came from the parts bin. The Mercedes looks like everything was planned out and executed to a high quality - whether you like the design or not. Again, theses were just quick first impressions.Really? The CT6 looks pretty good in pictures -- which never happens with Cadillac.
Why was it a disappointment?
:fall:The Mercedes looks like everything was planned out and executed to a high quality...
I don't get why GM keeps cranking out vehicles in bas-turd tweener sizesThe CT6 is not an E-Class nor an S-Class competitor. It is more of a tweener car.
Because it allows the brand to carve out a niche in a well-established and crowded luxury market.I don't get why GM keeps cranking out vehicles in bas-turd tweener sizes
64 of them to be exact.If I recall, there're numerous interior lighting color options.
After sitting in one last night at the auto show, the interior is not in the same class as the E or S. It was a disappointment in my mind.
Hmmm... sounds a lot like a certain member's thoughts of it from when he sat in it last July...I sat in a CT6 yesterday too. I'm disappointed to say that I left with the same interior impression. Hard plastic on the bottom half of the doors?!?!?! My CTS doesn't even have hard plastic.
That sounds about right.Typical old GM stuff. Disjointed/inelegant design, mismatch of good + bad materials, switchgear that looks cheap/like it came from the parts bin. The Mercedes looks like everything was planned out and executed to a high quality - whether you like the design or not. Again, theses were just quick first impressions.
The S Class outsold the CTS in the US last year, so you can be sure the E Class will outsell the CT6.This is guaranteed to outsell the CT6 in probably every market globally, including the US...