Um, Ed, have you seen recent Chevrolets?
I think the Chevy's generally do look upscale from the front end (excluding Spark and Sonic), it's when you round the corner to the back where they fall apart. I like the front end of the Malibu and it does look classy to me. The sides and especially the back loose it for me....Um, Ed, have you seen recent Chevrolets?
Cruze updated "face" does not look upscale or expensive LOLUm, Ed, have you seen recent Chevrolets?
GM did a great job with the Impala, but it's hard to fit large design cues like that on smaller cars.Cruze updated "face" does not look upscale or expensive LOL
The only face that looks expensive is the Impala imho
The real problem, IMO, is that Chevy hasn't found a brand design language that works on all vehicle. I'm not a huge proponent of corporate design languages, but it seems to be a trend in the industry today. I really like the Traverse's original face. It was edgy and classy at the same time.I think the Chevy's generally do look upscale from the front end (excluding Spark and Sonic), it's when you round the corner to the back where they fall apart. I like the front end of the Malibu and it does look classy to me. The sides and especially the back loose it for me....
Mr. Welburn sidesteps a lot of questions, I'd like to have a real answer to what Johan de Nysschen thinks of Cadillac's styling. I also would've like to have heard what designs he is most proud of. But overall an interesting read.
I wonder who his replacement will be as he is approaching retirement age.
HUGE dodge IMO, I think we have more than a couple disappointments yet to be unveiled coming from CadillacMr. Welburn sidesteps a lot of questions, I'd like to have a real answer to what Johan de Nysschen thinks of Cadillac's styling.