Yes, but water is H20. There are two hydrogen molecules and one oxygen and both of these in there gaseous state are very powerful. Especially the oxygen. At least that is what I was taught. Is this wrong?
http://www.wkyc.com/news/news_article.aspx?storyid=68227Michael O'mara @ WKYC said:Here are the basics of John's idea:
Radio-waves will heat certain metals. Tiny bits of a gold or carbon are injected into a cancer patient.
Those nano-particals can be guided by special targeting molecules to the abnormalities of the cancer cells and ignore the healthy cells.
The patient is then exposed to radio waves and only the cancer cells contaning the nanotubes heat up and die.
But John Kanzius has also stumbled upon yet another extrordinary breakthrough.
His machine could actually make saltwater burn.
Yes, but water is H20. There are two hydrogen molecules and one oxygen and both of these in there gaseous state are very powerful. Especially the oxygen. At least that is what I was taught. Is this wrong?Well I don't know the specifics, but you can't get out more energy than you put in. Water doesn't have chemical bonds that store energy the way gasoline does (and is easily released under high temperature).
Yes, the salt is what vibrates and separates the H20 into HHO gas. No salt, no vibration, no gas, only hot water.Why isn't this demonstration done with plain water instead of salt water?
Does the salt change anything?
Well, this is what confuses me. It is commonly known that hydrogen is expensive to "make," but there is a significant amount of unused energy around us everyday. There is no reason to transport hydrogen anywhere because it can be made locally. You can even make it at home. Why can't a solar panel or small home sized windmill be used to power the electrolysis of the water to make hydrogen? You don't have to make a lot at once either. If a Chevy Equinox fuel cell vehicle will get you 200 miles per charge it should last at least one week if not longer. This would give your home charging station one to two weeks to use solar power (or a home sized wind mill which is even more powerful) to power the electrolysis. Then all your paying for is water. And an initial investment on you alternative energy resources.You are right, hydrogen gas is very combustible. But when it burns, it combines with oxygen. The result is water, which is the "low-energy" state. (It's been a while since I took chemistry in college so I may not be explaining this very well.)
In other words, water is the result of the combustion, just as car exhaust is the result of gasoline combustion. Trying to use water as fuel is just like trying to use car exhaust as fuel. It can't be done because the energy has already been extracted.
In this case, he is using an energy input (radio waves) to bring the water to a high energy state so the molecules will break apart, and then the gases burn. There is no way for that to be efficient because you have to put in at least as much energy as you get out.
As wise men have said before me, "There ain't no such thing as a free lunch."