They messed with the wrong model's pricing structure.
All of these changes should have been on the ATS instead.
All of these changes should have been on the ATS instead.
Equipment being standard doesn't mean it's free. If they add $1000 worth of standard features, the car is worth $1000 more, and you should certainly expect the price you pay to correspond.Interesting.
AS I understand it, the base prices are unchanged, but there is greater standard equipment and the costs of options have moderated....
Perhaps not. If the dealers have good Sales people who knows their products and are able to point out to the Customet that they are getting more for the same price. But if they still have the same know nothing Sales People then you are right.Equipment being standard doesn't mean it's free. If they add $1000 worth of standard features, the car is worth $1000 more, and you should certainly expect the price you pay to correspond.
If they
add $1000 of features, but the price remains the same, that is equal to the price dropping $1000.
BUT.....
The general public will just see the same base price listed, not really know anything about additional features, say, "Eh", and move on.
I'm trying to determine whether Johan is a genius or a failure in the making. He seems to encourage very counter-intuitive moves, but sometimes the most innovative people do. It will definitely be interesting to see how Cadillac evolves over the next few years.The 'cult of De Nysschen' is growing strong...
I'm tuning out for a year and will check back after. He's clearly a bright guy, but the million dollar question is whether GM will really allow him to do what he's planning, or will they get cold feet and shorten Cadillac's leash again.
Yeah you have said that a few times, but here you are!The 'cult of De Nysschen' is growing strong...
I'm tuning out for a year and will check back after. He's clearly a bright guy, but the million dollar question is whether GM will really allow him to do what he's planning, or will they get cold feet and shorten Cadillac's leash again.
Actually..... both.They messed with the wrong model's pricing structure.
All of these changes should have been on the ATS instead.
He talks too much. I think JDN likes the attention.Didn't he just last week state that Cadillac was NOT lowering prices?
I think Cadillac is just a very high profile story for American news outlets. Its success means everything to General Motors (a major company) and is symbolically important for the country. Even just 5 years ago, its success did not seem very likely... not that it seems likely now, but at least there's a Man with a Plan in charge instead of some half-baked lobbyist-turned-executive.He talks too much. I think JDN likes the attention.
I think the media interest is due to Cadillac being associated with Detroit's disaster porn.I think Cadillac is just a very high profile story for American news outlets. Its success means everything to General Motors (a major company) and is symbolically important for the country. Even just 5 years ago, its success did not seem very likely... not that it seems likely now, but at least there's a Man with a Plan in charge instead of some half-baked lobbyist-turned-executive.
For whatever reason, it is undeniably a high profile "case" if you want to call it that.I think the media interest is due to Cadillac being associated with Detroit's disaster porn.
Someone (TheNewStandard?) posted some information the dealers got. It's not a big deal. It's a few grand off on some stuff but pricing really stays the same.Does anyone actually have examples of the changed pricing strategy? Has it happened yet?
anything for hitsIt's the headlines that are sensationalizing it as some massive price slash.