Joined
·
8,657 Posts
Looks like the Taurrus will go European for trim levels.
http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-taurus-st.html
http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-taurus-st.html
You are correct.^ +1.
Did they not learn their lesson the first time? The Five Hundred was a bomb, and sales went up when they rebadged effectively the same car as a Taurus.
Just call the freaking car a Taurus SHO and be done with it. Changes are NOT always for the better.
And people wonder why domestic brands are in the ****ter...idiotic little decisisons like this build up into big ones.
Ford's never going to learn when it comes to names. "ST"? Hardly anyone in the US has heard of that on a Ford. "SHO" has some recognition/heritage to it. If they weren't going to use that at least use GTYou are correct.
Maybe my mind is just in the gutter, but when I saw "ST", the first thing I thought of was "S...T...D?"Ford's never going to learn when it comes to names. "ST"? Hardly anyone in the US has heard of that on a Ford. "SHO" has some recognition/heritage to it. If they weren't going to use that at least use GT
thank you for this post. very informative!This isn't an SHO. This is a Ford Taurus which is going to get the benefit of some Lincoln add-ons (engine and suspension), cool rims, a monochrome exterior, and sporty seats.
An SHO is a Ford Taurus with a low-displacement, high-revving Yamaha engine with a manual transmission.
For those of you who know, the SHO came about because Ford has designed its Corvette competitor for debut in the late 1980's, but got cancelled at the last moment. Since the engines were already ordered, Ford decided to just put them in the Taurus as a last resort, but it caught on.
I like the sound of this car, and I agree with Ford not calling it an SHO. That would be like bringing out a FWD I4 turbo sports coupe and calling it a Mustang. It just isn't right.
O rly?This isn't an SHO. This is a Ford Taurus which is going to get the benefit of some Lincoln add-ons (engine and suspension), cool rims, a monochrome exterior, and sporty seats.
An SHO is a Ford Taurus with a low-displacement, high-revving Yamaha engine with a manual transmission.
For those of you who know, the SHO came about because Ford has designed its Corvette competitor for debut in the late 1980's, but got cancelled at the last moment. Since the engines were already ordered, Ford decided to just put them in the Taurus as a last resort, but it caught on.
I don't think this comparison is valid. The SHO may have been a V8, but it was a large FWD sedan. The ST will be a large FWD sedan with a powerful twin-turbo V6. I think that's more than fitting for the SHO name. And whos feelings are they protecting by not using the SHO name? The SHO certainly had and still has its fans, but are they going to anger so many people that the ST will flop if they call it SHO? I don't think so.That would be like bringing out a FWD I4 turbo sports coupe and calling it a Mustang. It just isn't right.
For those of you who know, the SHO came about because Ford has designed its Corvette competitor for debut in the late 1980's, but got cancelled at the last moment. Since the engines were already ordered, Ford decided to just put them in the Taurus as a last resort, but it caught on.
quote]
Where did you get that from, my understanding is the engine was developed for a competitor to the mr2 and fiero, nothign to do with the vette. They were 'talked' into the dohc engine after yamaha couldnt get the numbers they wanted from the available pushrod engines of the time that ford was giving them to modify.
Id love to see the sho name come back but I dont think its as huge a deal as people are making it here, only a handful of people nowadays know what a sho was. Id LOVE to see an svo mustang with an ecoboost I4 and lots of lightweight parts and some factory koni's but its aint gonna happen. Changing the name of a car is one thing, changing the name of a limited run performance options package is trivial in the grand scheme of sales unless you're dealing with big name performance cars, corvette, mustang, camaro etc.
As far as st goes, thats been used before by ford and its not that bad, european focus st? yea I wouldnt have a problem buying one of those, cosworth or not.
Actually the Yamaha 3.4 V8 had a 6800 rpm redline...stratospheric at the time for a V8 and pretty impressive even by today's standards. But the car was auto-only which killed it for many enthusiasts.O rly?
The last set of SHOs were low revving V8 saddled with automatics.