For sales mavens like me...Originally posted by johnd89@May 10 2004, 07:18 PM
"...I have no ideea what the exact numbers are for the production of the bmw m3 vs m5, but I'd bet the later sells in much smaller numbers (maybe 10 to 1)? the same would sell an sts-v!"
For sales mavens like me...Originally posted by tgagneguam+May 10 2004, 05:51 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (tgagneguam @ May 10 2004, 05:51 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-johnd89@May 10 2004, 07:18 PM
"...I have no ideea what the exact numbers are for the production of the bmw m3 vs m5, but I'd bet the later sells in much smaller numbers (maybe 10 to 1)? the same would sell an sts-v!"
I would imagine that the breakdown would be similar to comparable BMW vehicles. In 2003, AMG's totalled about 11,005 units in the USA, which was a 68.9% increase over 2002. I haven't been able to find the specifics with respect to C-class AMG's, et cetera.Originally posted by TaHoE@May 10 2004, 11:47 PM
Could you give us the sames numbers of the C-Class AMG/E-Class AMG and S4/RS6 too...thanks!
Originally posted by KnightHawk@May 11 2004, 01:15 AM
Too add to R.E Sanchez post, I found this link on another GM Forum site about the CTS-V Plus & STS-V
http://www.channel4.com/4car/gallery/spy-s...sts-v-plus.html
Here is a small excerpt from Channel4.com
"These shots show muscled-up Plus versions of the mid-size CTS-V and full-size STS-V saloons testing on the Nurburgring. The current CTS-V, on sale in America, already delivers 400bhp from its V8, but GM has engineered the Plus's V8 to put out nearly 500bhp. Reports suggest the STS-V Plus could develop as much as 700bhp from its tuned version of the Corvette's 6.0-litre V8. 0-60mph shouldn't take much longer than five seconds, for either car."
:drevil:
That information sounds both outdated and brand new in the same article. STS shots are old. CTS shots are new. CTS information is new. 4x4 system is already in production. I am utterly confused, but I hope LaNeve gave up on the Supercharged Northstar and is going with the Vette plant, and 700HP couldn't hurt!Originally posted by KnightHawk@May 10 2004, 08:15 PM
Too add to R.E Sanchez post, I found this link on another GM Forum site about the CTS-V Plus & STS-V
http://www.channel4.com/4car/gallery/spy-s...sts-v-plus.html
Here is a small excerpt from Channel4.com
"These shots show muscled-up Plus versions of the mid-size CTS-V and full-size STS-V saloons testing on the Nurburgring. The current CTS-V, on sale in America, already delivers 400bhp from its V8, but GM has engineered the Plus's V8 to put out nearly 500bhp. Reports suggest the STS-V Plus could develop as much as 700bhp from its tuned version of the Corvette's 6.0-litre V8. 0-60mph shouldn't take much longer than five seconds, for either car."
:drevil:
The new Northstar displaces 4.6L, and yes according to Mark LaNeve, it will be Supercharged, but there are now rumors thanks to this thread of a 700HP Vette powered STS...that would be very very exciting and would blow the M5 way out of the water. Here is the link to the original information:Originally posted by MelvinJ@May 10 2004, 08:38 PM
Look for a supercharged 4.2L Northstar in the STS-V.
sorry if my reply sounded harsh, I didn't meant it...Originally posted by tgagneguam@May 11 2004, 01:31 AM
Incidentally, johnd89, I wasn't trying to be a P.I.T.A. when I quoted the M sales. They do illustrate your point: M sales are relatively minute.
The new Northstar displaces 4.6L, and yes according to Mark LaNeve, it will be Supercharged, but there are now rumors thanks to this thread of a 700HP Vette powered STS...that would be very very exciting and would blow the M5 way out of the water. Here is the link to the original information:Originally posted by TaHoE+May 11 2004, 11:22 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (TaHoE @ May 11 2004, 11:22 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-MelvinJ@May 10 2004, 08:38 PM
Look for a supercharged 4.2L Northstar in the STS-V.
Umm.. Isn't five seconds alittle conservative as a 0-60 estimate for vehicles packing 500 and 700 horsepower respectively?
Too add to R.E Sanchez post, I found this link on another GM Forum site about the CTS-V Plus & STS-V
http://www.channel4.com/4car/gallery/spy-s...sts-v-plus.html
Here is a small excerpt from Channel4.com
"These shots show muscled-up Plus versions of the mid-size CTS-V and full-size STS-V saloons testing on the Nurburgring. The current CTS-V, on sale in America, already delivers 400bhp from its V8, but GM has engineered the Plus's V8 to put out nearly 500bhp. Reports suggest the STS-V Plus could develop as much as 700bhp from its tuned version of the Corvette's 6.0-litre V8. 0-60mph shouldn't take much longer than five seconds, for either car."
Not if it's a medium duty truck.Originally posted by dreadnaught1181@May 11 2004, 01:43 PM
Umm.. Isn't five seconds alittle conservative as a 0-60 estimate for vehicles packing 500 and 700 horsepower respectively?
Too add to R.E Sanchez post, I found this link on another GM Forum site about the CTS-V Plus & STS-V
http://www.channel4.com/4car/gallery/spy-s...sts-v-plus.html
Here is a small excerpt from Channel4.com
"These shots show muscled-up Plus versions of the mid-size CTS-V and full-size STS-V saloons testing on the Nurburgring. The current CTS-V, on sale in America, already delivers 400bhp from its V8, but GM has engineered the Plus's V8 to put out nearly 500bhp. Reports suggest the STS-V Plus could develop as much as 700bhp from its tuned version of the Corvette's 6.0-litre V8. 0-60mph shouldn't take much longer than five seconds, for either car."