And two more get sucked into the money pit...
Probably. However, Mahindra has stated previously that they were on the hunt for a Western/European brand and this seems like their best opportunity to snag one. They've also said that, if they were to obtain such a brand, they'd be "in it" for the long haul. I don't know if they'll have the patience to do it, but it sounds like they're saying the right things.And two more get sucked into the money pit...
Agreed! 9-5 is gorgeous.SAAB should change their name to Phoenix - they been reborn so many times I've lost count.
shame too - I saw a "new" 9-5 in the wild a few weeks back and it was gorgeous!
Saab built their own engines from 1972 to 2009 - firstly the B-series, which had been built for Saab prior to 1972, by Triumph, and then the H-series which lasted well into the GM era. The IP for the Saab H-series engine was transferred to SAIC in 2009, with GM Detroit no doubt pocketing the money!Saab never made its own engines.
I've seen a handful of 9-5s (and 9-4Xs) around in North Jersey over the last two years, and I have to say: It still looks fresh and attractive. I don't know if that's because both models were well designed, or if it has something to do with the fact that we just don't see too many of them on the road, but either way, kudos to Jason Castriota and his staff for their work on both products.Agreed! 9-5 is gorgeous.SAAB should change their name to Phoenix - they been reborn so many times I've lost count.
shame too - I saw a "new" 9-5 in the wild a few weeks back and it was gorgeous!
I really don't care anymore. Let Saab die in piece.
Agreed. However, if Mahindra is the winner and they are patient with the brand, I have a feeling they could pull off a re-launch of the brand in the long-term. Mahindra wants a Western brand and has considerably deeper pockets than NEVS, Spyker, or any of their partners. So from a financial standpoint, they'd be the most logical winner.Saab has so much potential, but it's such an uphill battle at this stage.
I do not believe Jason Castriota did anything with the NG9-5 or the 9-4X. The lead designer on the 9-5 was Simon Padian IIRC.but either way, kudos to Jason Castriota and his staff for their work on both products.
An interesting idea, although as you noted SsangYong mostly builds affordable SUVs/trucks while Saab has built more middle and upscale sedans/wagons. Regardless SsangYong will need almost a completely new lineup if they still want to get to the NA market this decade.If I were running Mahindra, I would pair SsasngYong and Saab together.
Might have made a nice Opel Omega or Signum? Or a better Buick Regal?shame too - I saw a "new" 9-5 in the wild a few weeks back and it was gorgeous!
That's not true, and the 9-3s that were briefly sold under NEVS were powered by the Saab turbo-four from the 9-5, not the Ecotec.Saab never made its own engines.
Saab didn't make that engine - GM did. As I understand it, Saab historically contracted out engine assembly. Saab certainly designed its own engines, but never had the volume (or interest) to fabricate them itself.That's not true, and the 9-3s that were briefly sold under NEVS were powered by the Saab turbo-four from the 9-5, not the Ecotec.
Correct, Simon was lead on the 9-5 & 9-4x. Jason Castriota came in after these were all done and he was the lead designer on the PhoeniX Concept.I do not believe Jason Castriota did anything with the NG9-5 or the 9-4X. The lead designer on the 9-5 was Simon Padian IIRC.