GM Inside News Forum banner
21 - 40 of 68 Posts
It is an awesome car! To me it's much better looking than any other current Buick which is how it should be. Al, did you take any night time pics to show the ambient lighting?
 
Sitting in all of the new Buicks at the dealer (while waiting for my always in the shop Pontiac G8 GT), I think the Lacrosse is one of GM's best cars, and one of the best on the road, inside and out.

The Regal looks and feels cheap by comparison. The Enclave is also excellent, while the Lucerne, well, the less said the better.
 
I drove a '11 malibu a few weeks ago and it was extremely quiet and drove like a more expensive car. It had very little go power on the interstate when floored though. It merely gathered speed.
The Lacrosse is even heavier than the 'bu.
I may be mistaken but I think the 'bu had 169hp and the lacrosse has 182hp is that correct?
If the lacrosse is DI and then 'bu is not then the lacrosse has 13 more hp and probably more torque also.

How does the lacrosse do on a full throttle kickdown at 55mph?
I felt like I couldn't own the 2.4L 'bu because of my concerns of not being able to complete a pass on a rural 2 lane road quickly enough.
 
Thanks for the review, I enjoyed it. On paper the 2.4L sounds ideal but I have to see further real world fuel economy to see if it actually saves gas over the V6. IMO the V6 is where it's at for performance/fuel efficiency. The biggest failure with this car has to be the trunk, compared to other large cars like the Taurus it just fails miserably. That's very disappointing since the rest of the car is very well done. My father is looking for a roomy/large sedan to replace his last Honda product this summer I will be sure to show him both the LaCrosse and Taurus, which IMO are the best large cars available. However I know the LaCrosse will lose a lot of points because of the trunk.
 
I drove a '11 malibu a few weeks ago and it was extremely quiet and drove like a more expensive car. It had very little go power on the interstate when floored though. It merely gathered speed.
The Lacrosse is even heavier than the 'bu.
I may be mistaken but I think the 'bu had 169hp and the lacrosse has 182hp is that correct?
If the lacrosse is DI and then 'bu is not then the lacrosse has 13 more hp and probably more torque also.

How does the lacrosse do on a full throttle kickdown at 55mph?
I felt like I couldn't own the 2.4L 'bu because of my concerns of not being able to complete a pass on a rural 2 lane road quickly enough.
Since you refer to the Malibu as the "'bu", what cute name will you be using for the LaCrosse?
 
What's equally amazing is how well this sense of luxury translates down to the base model. I've sung the praises of my father's LaCrosse for months now here. With just a convenience package I think it stickered for around 28K, and it's still an impressive car, cloth seats and all. Not the fastest thing around, and I agree about the A-pillar blind spots. But I don't think you mentioned how wonderful the rear seat accommodations are? It's one of the few cars anymore where I'd feel just fine riding in the back for a long distance trip.

Now, while I think Buick has a fine GT near-luxury sedan in the LaCrosse, I'm not sure I agree that it clearly out-points the CTS, which also has a lot going for it. But wouldn't it be great to see what Buick could do with a LaCrosse coupe? Would make a nice way to revive the Riviera name!
 
Discussion starter · #27 ·
What's equally amazing is how well this sense of luxury translates down to the base model. I've sung the praises of my father's LaCrosse for months now here. With just a convenience package I think it stickered for around 28K, and it's still an impressive car, cloth seats and all. Not the fastest thing around, and I agree about the A-pillar blind spots. But I don't think you mentioned how wonderful the rear seat accommodations are? It's one of the few cars anymore where I'd feel just fine riding in the back for a long distance trip.

Now, while I think Buick has a fine GT near-luxury sedan in the LaCrosse, I'm not sure I agree that it clearly out-points the CTS, which also has a lot going for it. But wouldn't it be great to see what Buick could do with a LaCrosse coupe? Would make a nice way to revive the Riviera name!
I did make a comment about the rear seats, fantastic place to be.

I noticed you picked up your Volt! Congrats! What a heck of a drivway you have sir!
 
I did make a comment about the rear seats, fantastic place to be.

I noticed you picked up your Volt! Congrats! What a heck of a drivway you have sir!
Thank you sir. Actually I'm so smitten with the Volt I'm half-considering selling the Corvette. Let's see how I feel in 6 to 12 months.

I've posted bits and pieces in other threads, but not everybody reads everything. Some early photos of it here and here. Cheers!
 
I can easily see an eAssist LaCrosse replacing the G8 down the road. Of course by then I hope to have the option of a thoroughly modern Epsilon II Chevy Impala with eAssist and AWD to consider as well.
 
Maybe the rumored LaCrosse GS would pique your interest?
Nah, the price is going to be pretty out there for me to swallow. Plus, Ill have the G8 certainly paid off by then so itll likely turn into a very fun go fast weekend car.

The eAssist LaX or Regal would make for a great DD and I could pick up a used one and let someone else take the depreciation hit.
 
Nah, the price is going to be pretty out there for me to swallow. Plus, Ill have the G8 certainly paid off by then so itll likely turn into a very fun go fast weekend car.

The eAssist LaX or Regal would make for a great DD and I could pick up a used one and let someone else take the depreciation hit.
Ah, I understand.
 
Nice write up.
-- -- -- -- --
Text states (a decidedly non-ideal condition) 23 MPG, closing says 21.5.
-- -- -- -- --
>>"While this car was equipped with the 2.4 liter four cylinder direct injection engine, it was wearing the three-pot trim."<<

When has Buick ever stated that VentiPort count equated to cylinder count ??
For the vast 60-yr majority of VentiPort useage, it has not.
Did I miss a press release or is this the usual assumption?
You did; back in 2005 they said that all the V6's would have 3 ports, only the
cars with the V8 Northstar would have 4!
 
Ah, I understand.
Yea, the only, and only way, I would buy a new GM is if I got the GM Card, got a top off, a few k off MSRP (which I can through USAA) and some loyalty cash thrown in.

A LaX CXL will run me $28,464 through USAA. Almost $2k off. GM top off is usually $2k so then its $26,464 and $1k for loyalty will get it to $25,464.

Yes, Im not looking for a new car for at least 2 more years but Im already scoping it out. :lmao:
 
Discussion starter · #38 · (Edited)
BTW guys, CanonAdam is GMI Northeast's offical photographer! Make sure you guys make him feel welcome here!

Thanks guy for the great feedback!

I have not driven an AWD Lax or CTS, so its tough to say which I would take. Id like to have two equally equiped cars back to back to get a good idea on how they feel. So far, all three CTS's Ive had were RWD with sport packages, and one of course in V trim.
CTS's balance would still play out over the LaX. Equipment and comfort wise? Lax would win that, as well as price. An AWD 3.6 SIDI car would easy reach over 50k, 10k more then a loaded LaX CXS AWD. Would that be enough to sell me on a CTS? Id love to find out.
 
I wonder how many people will choose the LaX over a CTS if they were both 3.6 and AWD.

What would you do Al? FWD or RWD based for you?
I think the Lacrosse is beautiful but it has that odd shape that makes it look really big, as Al described.

Given the choice I would have to choose the CTS over its better driving dynamics and the look of the car. I'm all for the Buick lineup with its current design, but there is something about the CTS that just does it for me.
 
21 - 40 of 68 Posts