I'm not sure I understand the fascination with push button start...can anyone explain it to me?
It would seem like a gimmick until you drive a car with this system for a week. You will get back into your regular car and then it will seem like a pain to get the key out of your pocket and actually unlock the doors and have to put them in the ignition cylinder.New_Mexico_Sunset_on_Rt66 said:It's a gimmick, plain and simple.
It will not let you start the car and lock it while it is running. I tried this. This thing is no different then when they first came our with FOB remotes. They were new and only a few cars had them. Now they are common place. This will become common too.01cavalier said:It isn't a bad idea, really. Though the push button start and the system to sense that the key fob is in the car may have problems, it eliminates having a mechanical part that can be troublesome at times.
i concur.GMFreak8 said:Am I the only one that likes taking a key out and turning the key to crank the engine? It's just not the same pressing a button. If I want to press a power button, I'll turn my computer on.
My F-150 is on it's last legs, so I have an aversion to spending much money on it. I have to turn the key to start, push down on the rod from the lock assembly to the ignition switch until the power comes on and then hit a button I installed on the dash because the original starting circuit fried. I'm then rewarded with a racecar like roar, because the muffler fell off. I like to think of it as a poor man's anti-theft system.Slack said:Those are for sissies. Real men use a handle to manually turn the crank.
The former isn't really a "pushbutton start" but rather an adapted "turn key start" They say the car has a "start button" but they never call it pushbutton start.Squachy said:BMW went kind of stupid with their push button start....
You have a keyless fob, you get in the car, you have to put the thing into a slot under the push button starter, then press the button to start it.
And they make you pay more for the "convenience package" or something so you DONT have to put the fob into the slot.
I mean cmon, you basically have to put a "key" into the "keyhole" and instead of turning the key you push a button......
We had less obese people back thenWarwick44 said:It would seem like a gimmick until you drive a car with this system for a week. You will get back into your regular car and then it will seem like a pain to get the key out of your pocket and actually unlock the doors and have to put them in the ignition cylinder.
Remember when you had to walk over to the TV to change the station?
you called it! that made me laugh-thank youButz said:We had less obese people back then![]()
I see it now, Push button start causes 10% increase in obesity worldwide![]()
That's what they said for everything from power windows ("more stuff to break") to remote entry ("gimmick").New_Mexico_Sunset_on_Rt66 said:It's a gimmick, plain and simple.
Did you read what I posted further up? The convenience factor is huge. It's not just about replacing a twist motion with a push motion.shadams said:This is a perfect example of what I have always said. Something as simple as using a key is surpassed by not having to use a key, now all of a sudden vehicles without this technology (if you even want to call it that) are old and behind the times. So now people are choosing vehicles over something as inconvienient as twisting your wrist and totally overlooking the time and effort put into simply building a good car. It drives me crazy how spoiled we have become. How many threads do we have hear about _________ not having _________ and a base model _________ has it, when is GM going to get with the program, stupid GM.
guitarlix said:That's what they said for everything from power windows ("more stuff to break") to remote entry ("gimmick").