GM Inside News Forum banner

1 - 10 of 10 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
8 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I don't know or care if the above subject words are proper English. I've been trying to think of words that describe what was passed off as music/entertainment at the superbowl. Where do these freaks come from and I don't mean just the performers, but also the hordes of freaks worshiping this type of orgy. CBS has apologized for the baring of a tit, which I missed due to my disgust with the whole thing, but that only seems incidental compared to the idiocy of the whole scenario. Believe me folks, this ain't music or wholesome entertainment; it may or could be the next thing to Lucifer on parade.
I apologize for being a 71 year old fuddy duddy, if there is need, but when you get past Elvis doing "Proud Mary" or Chuck Berry's "Maybelline"...................
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
12,307 Posts
Different strokes for different folks.

Although I don't particularly like the music that played either, there are many other bands and traditional singers I wouldn't have liked either.

How many kids (and more importantly targeted consumers) today would have prefered to see Bette Midler or Willie Nelson or Barry Manilow or Wayne Newton singing wholesome music? Very few. You have to play to the masses. Unfortunately more often than not, the masses have no taste.

As for the breast, there is no way that it wasn't planned. Maybe the top brass at CBS didn't know about it, but certainly the costume people did, as did Justin Timberlake and Janet herself. In the meantime, it's great publicity for CBS. No one is talking about the game, they are talking about the tit. And talking about CBS. That's all they really want.

America, get over it! A bare breast is no big deal. I'm pretty sure everyone has seen one (usually two) at some point in their life. I know I can't even check e-mail without a boob encounter. I can't beleive the reaction this is getting. Why is America so prudish when it comes to nudity?

In closing, here's a nice pair of boobies:

 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
3,704 Posts
Lucifer on Parade? That mess wasn't even worthy of Ghrankenstein on Parade.

Ghrankenstein

:frankie:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,126 Posts
I was listening to the radio the other day and apparently good old JT is calling the tittie incident a "wardrobe malfunction"....how lame is that...Anyway....I'm probably the oddity but I'm 16 and I listent to marvin gaye, barry white, beach boys, four tops, and stuff like that...I also listen to rock but...I detest hip hop and pop....they're all washed up superstars who cant sing. IMHO of course
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,075 Posts
They are only entertaining the under 30 crowd while they forget there are people older than that and that we still enjoy hearing from truly talented veterans with substance in the entertainment business....

As far as Janet's wardrobe malfunction.. that is BS.. who wears gold pasties unless you were going to conceal your areolas from being exposed at some point in time?... That was a planned publicity act and I found it indecent considering that there was a large audience of children that had no business being exposed to such sexuality. Too often these days young people get wrong and mixed messages about sexuality... It has become too much of a sport and a past time rather than meaningful intimate moments two people can share...

Stevie Nicks said one time that she would never flaunt her sexuality by wearing skimpy clothing that would reveal too much skin or acting in an inappropriate manner. Her focus was always her music and she also said that she wanted there to be a mystique about her that left something to the imagination..

It's too bad so called artists these days thinks the only thing that sells these days is sex and not doing something with their music that has relavent substance...
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
3,704 Posts
They are only entertaining the under 30 crowd while they forget there are people older than that and that we still enjoy hearing from truly talented veterans with substance in the entertainment business....
No doubt. When we were kids, we had Slayer, Metallica, and Megadeth. They had roadies instead of backup dancers.

Ghrank
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
14,692 Posts
Originally posted by bakerna@Feb 3 2004, 10:45 AM
I detest hip hop and pop....they're all washed up superstars who cant sing. IMHO of course
Proven by the fact that most of the people were lip-synching the whole way through.

Now I can understand Janet lip-synching to some degree with all of the dance moves, but the rappers (P. Diddy, Nelly) had no excuses - they were just standing there. It can only mean that they sukk when they "sing" live.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
685 Posts
I can't believe there is even a problem! Who gives crap! So what, she had a damn pasty on anyway! Less skin than you see on commercials, soaps or regular MTV! WTF!

And as far as who was a part of the show, well, it is show business. Aerosmith for the older rockers, Kid Rock for the younger, Ms. Jackson(becuase I am nasty) and Justine Timberlake for Pop, Puss Doody and sMelly for Rap. What is the problem? They can't very well please everyone.
 
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
Top