Joined
·
12,307 Posts
612 Scaglietti







worked in the 70's for Chevy, could work again?Originally posted by bksavs@Jan 4 2004, 01:00 PM
This looks like the 575 Maranellos' "Nice" sister. Nothing wrong, it just doesn't fire the soul like other Ferraris or the new Vette. Speaking of wich, Combine this with the Vette, through in an LS1, keep it under 30K, and call it Camaro. This is a classic Ferrari design. I got a 4 hour video on the history of Ferrari for X-Mas. I see so many styling cues from older GT models. Thanks for the pics. I'll buy and drive GM but there'll always be a place in my heart for Ferrari.
you are out of your mind.Originally posted by banzai79@Jan 7 2004, 11:39 PM
Anybody can make an car look and drive good if you're going to charge 300K for it. Big whoop-ti-doo, I think Ferraris suck not because they're bad cars, they're great cars in fact, but the pricetag and the overly-complex powertrains indicate an inability to engineer well.
If you had 300k to throw around you could easily make a Geo Metro outperform anything with a prancing horse on the hood.
Dude, its a freaking Ferrari.Originally posted by banzai79@Jan 7 2004, 06:39 PM
Anybody can make an car look and drive good if you're going to charge 300K for it. Big whoop-ti-doo, I think Ferraris suck not because they're bad cars, they're great cars in fact, but the pricetag and the overly-complex powertrains indicate an inability to engineer well.
If you had 300k to throw around you could easily make a Geo Metro outperform anything with a prancing horse on the hood.