Predictions:
NACOTY:
Ford Mustang
NATOTY:
Ford F-150
On that note, go MKC!
NACOTY:
Ford Mustang
NATOTY:
Ford F-150
On that note, go MKC!
Agreed; it has already beat F150 for another high profile award; here's hoping that trend continues. Would be a HUGE knock to Ford to lose multiple accolades they probably think should automatically be theirs.I'm betting on the Colorado
It probably will.Colorado better take it!
personally I think they should look at the truck compared to its segment and does the AL F150 offer a lot to the consumer VS the 14 OR the competition2014 isn't quite over and yet the F-150 has already sold more examples this year than the previous Colorado did during its entire existence. The F-150 may not be perfect, but the changes for 2015 are far more relevant to its segment than that of the Colorado. Using aluminum so extensively on a product of such high volume is unique and takes guts. As good as the Colorado is, it's just a strong effort in a segment where only a minimal effort has been the status quo for several years.
Over 1 million over-sized monsters were sold last year, leading me to conclude that this is the size of truck people want. I quite like the idea of a smaller truck option, and GM was smart to introduce one that it unquestionably top of the class, but trucks are huge because people want huge trucks.Golf is the better "new car", Colorado is a fresher take on the segment (and debatably more useful) than an oversized aluminum monster with okay gas mileage.
Good point; the Colorado is best in a very weak class; fullsize trucks are amongst the best vehicles in the industry (at least the GM, Ram and Ford ones), so being measurably better is harder than in the crappy midsize class that hasn't evolved in a decade and no manufacturer took seriously anymore.As good as the Colorado is, it's just a strong effort in a segment where only a minimal effort has been the status quo for several years.
Predictions:
NACOTY:
Ford Mustang
NATOTY:
Ford F-150
On that note, go MKC!![]()
I'm not sure how you can say the changes to the F150 are far more relevant to its segment than the Colorado, but at the same time say the Colorado is competing with weak efforts from Toyota and Nissan. Everything about the Colorado (powertrain, interior, exterior, tech) raises the bar of the mid-size truck segment. While the F150 most relevant addition is aluminum, not that it's an irrelevant addition.2014 isn't quite over and yet the F-150 has already sold more examples this year than the previous Colorado did during its entire existence. The F-150 may not be perfect, but the changes for 2015 are far more relevant to its segment than that of the Colorado. Using aluminum so extensively on a product of such high volume is unique and takes guts. As good as the Colorado is, it's just a strong effort in a segment where only a minimal effort has been the status quo for several years.
All true. But is the Colorado competing against the Tacoma and Frontier for Truck of the Year? If the criteria is how well the finalists compete against their class, and fault that finalist because the rest of the class sucks, the Truck/Car of the Year contest is flawed.Good point; the Colorado is best in a very weak class; fullsize trucks are amongst the best vehicles in the industry (at least the GM, Ram and Ford ones), so being measurably better is harder than in the crappy midsize class that hasn't evolved in a decade and no manufacturer took seriously anymore.
Not saying tha Colorado isn't an excellent truck, because it is, but it's easy to be head and shoulders above when you're standing next to midgets...
Oh I'm not really questioning the MT results; they make their argument and I can't find obvious fault with it (even if I'd disagree). I just think that the Colorado is so much better than its competition than the F-150 is than its own competition that some people discredit the F-150 as a lame rehash, when it's far from that, and will have more impact on the industry long-term than the Colorado.All true. But is the Colorado competing against the Tacoma and Frontier for Truck of the Year? If the criteria is how well the finalists compete against their class, and fault that finalist because the rest of the class sucks, the Truck/Car of the Year contest is flawed.
Does the Colorado not offer content and comfort of a full-sized truck in a smaller, better driving package? I must have saw a dozen comparisons comparing the Colorado and F150 before the first review of either. And even after, you see the comparisons to the F150 in reviews after they are out. So why can't they compare against each other here?
Chevrolet's well deserved sweep last year + how much the F150 matters to Ford make that.... a little more difficult although it should not.I'm betting on the Colorado
Genesis or Golf is a tough call ............Mustang on the otherhand, came out with too much left to do.Hyundai Genesis deserves it...
Probably Colorado/Golf. Genesis and MKC have no business being there.
F150 is much ado about nothing, Mustang is a better interior with a cool Ecoboost and a ****tier GT.
Golf is the better "new car", Colorado is a fresher take on the segment (and debatably more useful) than an oversized aluminum monster with okay gas mileage.
If and when the hybrid hits, that'll take Truck of the Year. As is... no.
It probably will.