Deserving win by the F-150, but I think the Mustang should have won COTY instead of the Golf. I guess a Ford sweep didn't sit well with them?
I never understood the Golf love either. I usually glance over Golf articles in automotive magazines.Good for Ford! Not really a surprise either. The VW is a surprise - kind of like the Academy awards with some movie no one has ever seen wins. I know the VW is held in high regards in the automotive press, but the reality is they don't really sell well.
Mustang, while a competent product, doesn't set a new benchmark in its class the way Golf/GTI does.Deserving win by the F-150, but I think the Mustang should have won COTY instead of the Golf. I guess a Ford sweep didn't sit well with them?
The fact that the insipid MKC received any votes at all is noteworthy!Lincoln getting the Rodney Dangerfield treatment.
What does the Golf set benchmark wise, exactly? Maybe I'm being dense, but I fail to see why everyone thinks of the Golf so highly.Mustang, while a competent product, doesn't set a new benchmark in its class the way Golf/GTI does.
Actually, neither does F-150. As KingElvis noted however, novel processes for manufacturing this high volume vehicle could ostensibly provide justification for the truck award, even though Chevrolet Colorado makes a more compelling case when it comes solely to product attributes.
According to Consumer Reports' latest automotive reliability survey, all gasoline and diesel powered Rabbit and Golf models with sufficient data rated better than average since model year 2007 for the most part. No model year was worse than average.Now, about reliability........
If you have the opportunity, test drive a Golf "Launch Edition" (the lowest priced variant in the U.S. market) and then test drive competitive C-segment vehicles at the same price point.What does the Golf set benchmark wise, exactly? Maybe I'm being dense, but I fail to see why everyone thinks of the Golf so highly.
According to JD Powers, the 2014 model's reliability is middling at best and predicted to be worse than average:According to Consumer Reports' latest automotive reliability survey, all gasoline and diesel powered Rabbit and Golf models with sufficient data rated better than average since model year 2007 for the most part. No model year was worse than average.
I test drove the Golf, Cruze, Mazda 3, Subaru Impreza, Ford Focus, Kia Forte before deciding on the 3.What does the Golf set benchmark wise, exactly? Maybe I'm being dense, but I fail to see why everyone thinks of the Golf so highly.
The new Golf is made in Mexico, previous Golf was made in Germany, which is why it was more reliable than the Jetta and the only VW I considered. Will the Golf now fall out of CR recommendations because of that? Time will tell but it doesn't bode well for them.According to Consumer Reports' latest automotive reliability survey, all gasoline and diesel powered Rabbit and Golf models with sufficient data rated better than average since model year 2007 for the most part. No model year was worse than average.
Couldn't agree more. Somehow it got even uglier.Man, that F-150 is ugly. I wanted to see the Colorado win. I figured the Golf would win for cars, compared to others in the class it feels more expensive than it is. Now, about reliability........