Wow, that intro female was really showing off the uppercrust New England accent to emphasize the prospective clientele...Too bad they were already flocking to BMW in '85.
For 1985, GM dropped the 252-cu.in. V-6 and made the 307-cu.in. V-8 the standard engine across the entire Riviera lineup. The turbocharged V-6 remained an available option on the convertible, with its price reduced to $735, but a mere 49 customers checked this particular option box. For the Riviera convertible’s final year on the market, GM built just 400 examples in total, priced from $26,797. With options piled on, however, it was relatively easy to price a Riviera convertible well beyond the $30,000 mark...
Video: 1985 Buick Riviera LaserDisc Promo
1995 was the bomb, my aunt had one she drove it for 10 plus years.I was never really a fan of this generation Riviera.
For me personally the best years for the nameplate were 1963-65, 1971-73, and 1995-99
And hopefully 2017/18 - ....
Luxury was a different world back then. As a kid I remember people really caring about ride quality and interior space. You almost never hear about these things anymore. There was an attraction to massive sofa like seating and performance just meant you had a big motor with some decent power for some high speed highway cruising.And not everyone cared about a sterile car with a roundel or three-pointed star to drive something nice... especially if GM was in your family.
Performance and luxury have always intermingled to some extent - but yes, some of the notions about 'handling' are silly and spurious. You couldn't even begin to use the capability.Luxury was a different world back then. As a kid I remember people really caring about ride quality and interior space. You almost never hear about these things anymore. There was an attraction to massive sofa like seating and performance just meant you had a big motor with some decent power for some high speed highway cruising.
I understand that seems odd today. Now everyone likes to pretends they're drving on the autobahn or need a car that can run the ring to qualify as luxury. In a way it's funny....
It really is a generational thing. Think about the baby boomer generation and older - they were raised on nothing but large, massive Detroit iron. From the beginning of the 20th century until the 1970s every American probably learned to drive on a big, floaty American car. Fun to drive factor is more important for younger people than hitting the cruise at 70 and falling asleep on a crushed velour sofa.Luxury was a different world back then. As a kid I remember people really caring about ride quality and interior space. You almost never hear about these things anymore. There was an attraction to massive sofa like seating and performance just meant you had a big motor with some decent power for some high speed highway cruising.
I understand that seems odd today. Now everyone likes to pretends they're drving on the autobahn or need a car that can run the ring to qualify as luxury. In a way it's funny....
I know this is off topic, but I bought a Linden-made Beretta in 1990 that was - without question - the most reliable car I have ever had. 230,000 trouble free miles with the 3.1L V6 and 3 sp automatic. Nothing ever broke on that car - not a thing went wrong with it. I only ditched it since it was leaking oil and I just finished law school, so I treated myself to a Saab (a "lawyer's car" whatever that means). I wished I had kept the Beretta and seen how many more miles I could have put on it. Thanks for the memories.I spent many a day, as a child, in the Linden Plant in New Jersey where my dad was Material Director. Miss that plant - it was like a second home. I used to love going around watching the cars being assembled. Grew up watching these (and the Olds and Caddys), then the Beretta and Corsica, and finally the S-Series pickups and Blazers/Jimmys. It was heartbreaking watch them reduce a historic plant to a dusty field. Now it's a warehouse.
The Riviera was originally designed in styling studios by GM to be a Cadilliac, not an Olds. It was intended to be called a LaSalle and compete with the four seat luxury Thunderbird. It's clean but edgy bodyside sculpture was influenced by Rolls Royces which impressed Bill Mitchell during a trip to London. If you notice, the dual upright grilles on the front of the fenders purposely mimic the classic LaSalle grilles. Cadillac was offered the design but not interested, so it was offered to the other GM divisions in a competition. Buick won with their presentation.The Riv T-Type was my favorite of that generation. But nothing compares to the original '63-'65 --just gorgeous. Did you guys know that car was developed for Olds, but the didn't want it? Buick took it at the last minute.
Same thing - almost -as that guy above me.I spent many a day, as a child, in the Linden Plant in New Jersey where my dad was Material Director. Miss that plant - it was like a second home. I used to love going around watching the cars being assembled. Grew up watching these (and the Olds and Caddys), then the Beretta and Corsica, and finally the S-Series pickups and Blazers/Jimmys. It was heartbreaking watch them reduce a historic plant to a dusty field. Now it's a warehouse.
I heard it was developped first for Cadillac as for a future "LaSalle", then Olds and... Chevrolet before the Buick guys stepped on the occasion.The Riv T-Type was my favorite of that generation. But nothing compares to the original '63-'65 --just gorgeous. Did you guys know that car was developed for Olds, but the didn't want it? Buick took it at the last minute.
![]()