Joined
·
4,494 Posts
I don't think the fate of the brands should be based on the latest products they offered. If so, Olds might have won out over every other GM brand. Long term brand positioning just didn't favor Olds. It's mission became "import fighter", the brand the Saturn buyers would ascend to. Right. That was a positively stupid assumption on GM's part. Oldsmobile, by name, was the epitome of "old school Americana". Even the "Old" in "Old"smobile stood out and created a stigma noticed by many younger people. Even without Oldsmobile, GM has more brands than they need for long-term success. Chevy is targeting the center of the market, Pontiac is doing the same, in perhaps a more European flavor than Chevy. Buick may go after the American-near-luxury in the ilk of Lincoln or Chrysler, freeing up Cadillac to move further upmarket with a contemporay lineup. Saab then covers near luxury in the Euro slant. That leaves Saturn in limbo, with little value other than appealing to those now loyal to the brand. It's madness. Where, oh where, would Olds have fit into this already-convoluted scheme? The costs of developing, distributing, and marketing products for redundant brands like Olds, Saturn, and even Pontiac take away from funds that could be used to bolster a very strong three-branded portfolio.
So, even if you liked the last Aurora or Intrigue, consider the money that would have been spent on their successors, and where else that money should be used.
So, even if you liked the last Aurora or Intrigue, consider the money that would have been spent on their successors, and where else that money should be used.