bet ya it's uglier than me too...frontier sucks, I respect nissan but I detest the stying on that vehicle
Aren't the Nisson Frontier's supercharged and only making 240? If so premium gas will be needed. Doesn't make sense on a small truck.Originally posted by usafang@Jun 19 2004, 06:28 PM
I test drove the I5 and I'm not impressed. That's why my 95 GMC Sonoma will be replaced with the 2k5 Frontier that has a 4.0 V6(drived from the SWEET 3.5) with 240+ hp and can be had with a manual transmission. Bet ya the mpg's will be as good as the I5 plus more HP and torgue!!
The D-Maxx's Diesels are only 4 Cyls. There is The 3.5 DI V6 but it is gas. None of these engines are US certified because none of them are sold in the states, note slightly different DI v6 than the other Isuzu's get. The D-Maxx is on a slightly different platform than the Colorado/Canyon twins. The actual chassis engineers stated that a V6 will not fit nor would a V8 or the I6. The I6 is to long. The V6's and V8's are to wide. The twins were made for just the inline Atlas 5 and 4. The Turbo I5 will make plenty of power. The 4 and 5 will both get bumps in hp over the years, timing change for more power and less gas mileage. [/b][/quote]Originally posted by 91z4me+Jun 19 2004, 03:11 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (91z4me @ Jun 19 2004, 03:11 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>@Jun 15 2004, 05:18 PM
It is interesting that the I4/I5 is only going into the GMT355s.
I guess the fact the Atlas engine line shares so many parts it
is not really all that bad that they are not distributing them to
other lines. I guess the I5 will be in the H3, too.
That post is exactly on the money.
grrrrrrr they should ditch the I5 for the H3 and install the Isuzu D-Maxx V-6 diesel. Hummer's a name in offroad right? and what do you do when you go offroad, go slowly. WHat do you need to move weight at slow speed? torque, and what is diesel all about? TORQUE. Very simple equation, GM designers hopefully have seen it, it should just be a bolt in replacement. Maybe it shouldn't be the standard engine but at least an option. Hummer is an offroad brand, and the H3 will most likely compete with upper end liberties and lower end Grand Cherokees and in order to do that they need the offroad prowess to match. GM screwed up on the H2, no going back on that, but the H3 is pretty much a clean slate, I'm hoping that enough people over at GM have had the same thoughts as me and they are going to make the V-6 available on the H3. Hopefully.....
So, so unlike GM, sad to say.Originally posted by Ming@Jun 14 2004, 02:48 PM
I may just be strange, but I think the idea of a 5-cylinder inline DOHC engine from GM is just wicked cool. So unlike the cheap and lazy GM method of dropping a "proven" engine in there.
I really don't think it's "a lot more weight spinning around". The 4.2L I6 doesn't have balance shafts, and by my calculations, if the I5 was making the same hp/L it would only have about 8 more horsepower.Originally posted by Doctor Gravity@Jul 27 2004, 06:45 AM
As to what Dark Helmet said about the balance shafts, that really doesn't make a great motor, that means alot more weight to be spinning around, loss of power.
i was told it too GM 7 Years to design this motor, you think GM could have done better then that.
Unfortunately the I5 in the Canyon and colorado is just too tall without going in at a slant /. Also the I5 isn't built for performance in its current form, it is a truck motor and therefore quite undersquare.Originally posted by big swede@Aug 10 2004, 08:11 PM
What do you guys think about this I-5 usage. A Kappa based Nomad. It's RWD so it should fit in the engine bay. The platform is light enough for the I-5 to provide plenty of zip in stock form with an available SS version having the rumored turbo I-5 from the Colorado SS.