These are just my opinions on each of GM's divisions; some are common some may not be.
Chevrolet
It is the most important GM division. It has been the number 1 selling brand in America for so many years. It has always stood for affordability and dependability. Chevrolet should not take a new or radical direction.
The Good: Cobalt, Malibu, Impala, Corvette, Equinox, Tahoe, Suburban, Avalanche, Colorado, and Silverado.
The Bad: SSR (it is so big and bulky in person, interior has no appeal either), Aveo (Korean PoS that disgraces the Chevy bowtie), Tracker, S-10, Blazer, Uplander, and Venture.
The Could be Better: Monte Carlo (exterior styling needs to be redone) and Trailblazer (only an average SUV but it does sell very well).
The Should be Added: Camaro (RWD affordable sporty coupe, base model should be for looks with an adequate engine, performance models available for those who want them. I do not miss the styling of the discontinued model, though).
Saturn
They produce cheap but safe, comfortable, and reliable vehicles. A good brand.
Pontiac
It is considered the sporty, performance brand of GM. But, it does not fit those shoes very well. It should keep its role but do a better job of it. A good revival from Pontiac could mean a lot to GM.
The Good: Solstice, G6, Grand Prix, and Vibe.
The Bad: Sunfire (nothing there the Cobalt won’t offer), Aztec (the sooner its replaced the better), Montana (I don’t see the point of the sporty, performance brand having a van).
The Could be Better: Bonneville (Why have two full-size FWD sedans? What about going RWD?) GTO (Though it does perform it looks so much like the Grand Prix coupe they discontinued a few years ago. It needs better styling.)
The Should be Added: Affordable and restyled GTO (Offer the GTO with a small and affordable engine in addition to the performance model. GTO and before mentioned Camaro should not be styled the same, though.)
GMC
For a long time it was a generic clone of Chevy Trucks. Since they were restyled in ’99 GMC has improved and might even be considered a luxury truck division in comparison to Chevrolet. GMC should continue to move in its own direction.
The Good: All their vehicle offerings; the Denali line.
The Bad: The division is cloned from Chevrolet.
The Could be Better: When the division gets redesigned in ’06-’07 it should be styled differently than Chevrolet. It should appeal to a minority demographic since Chevrolet appeals to the mainstream masses.
The Should be Added: GMC Trident (My idea, a small, off-road capable SUV, about the size of the Equinox but with its own styling.)
Buick
Vehicles from this division should be about the ride and not the performance. All models should have leather, wood-grained accents, climate control, and an excellent sound system. However the hood should have nothing more than a dependable V6. With only an adequate engine Buick could offer an unrivaled riding experience on an affordable level.
The Good: LeSabre, Park Avenue, and Rendezvous.
The Bad: Terraza (Why does this division have a van? Get rid of it.)
The Could be Better: LaCrosse (Interior is excellent, but exterior leaves much to be desired.) Rainier (Interior should be brought up to par.)
The Should be Added: Velite (The idea is right. I plush four-seat coupe/convertible would fit well in this division.)
Cadillac
It’s the ultimate in luxury and performance. The Cadillac name and badge carry an awe with the American people. The new designs of the past three years are excellent. Cadillac is on the perfect course.
The Good: All vehicles once STS replaces Seville.
The Bad: You find something.
The Could be Better: More V-Series as quick as you can.
The Should be Added: A more affordable, by Cadillac standards, Coupe/Convertible.
Oldsmobile R.I.P.
May the most generic brand in America Rest In Peace. I can't say I'll miss it.
Those are my views and opinions agree or disagree if you like.
Chevrolet
It is the most important GM division. It has been the number 1 selling brand in America for so many years. It has always stood for affordability and dependability. Chevrolet should not take a new or radical direction.
The Good: Cobalt, Malibu, Impala, Corvette, Equinox, Tahoe, Suburban, Avalanche, Colorado, and Silverado.
The Bad: SSR (it is so big and bulky in person, interior has no appeal either), Aveo (Korean PoS that disgraces the Chevy bowtie), Tracker, S-10, Blazer, Uplander, and Venture.
The Could be Better: Monte Carlo (exterior styling needs to be redone) and Trailblazer (only an average SUV but it does sell very well).
The Should be Added: Camaro (RWD affordable sporty coupe, base model should be for looks with an adequate engine, performance models available for those who want them. I do not miss the styling of the discontinued model, though).
Saturn
They produce cheap but safe, comfortable, and reliable vehicles. A good brand.
Pontiac
It is considered the sporty, performance brand of GM. But, it does not fit those shoes very well. It should keep its role but do a better job of it. A good revival from Pontiac could mean a lot to GM.
The Good: Solstice, G6, Grand Prix, and Vibe.
The Bad: Sunfire (nothing there the Cobalt won’t offer), Aztec (the sooner its replaced the better), Montana (I don’t see the point of the sporty, performance brand having a van).
The Could be Better: Bonneville (Why have two full-size FWD sedans? What about going RWD?) GTO (Though it does perform it looks so much like the Grand Prix coupe they discontinued a few years ago. It needs better styling.)
The Should be Added: Affordable and restyled GTO (Offer the GTO with a small and affordable engine in addition to the performance model. GTO and before mentioned Camaro should not be styled the same, though.)
GMC
For a long time it was a generic clone of Chevy Trucks. Since they were restyled in ’99 GMC has improved and might even be considered a luxury truck division in comparison to Chevrolet. GMC should continue to move in its own direction.
The Good: All their vehicle offerings; the Denali line.
The Bad: The division is cloned from Chevrolet.
The Could be Better: When the division gets redesigned in ’06-’07 it should be styled differently than Chevrolet. It should appeal to a minority demographic since Chevrolet appeals to the mainstream masses.
The Should be Added: GMC Trident (My idea, a small, off-road capable SUV, about the size of the Equinox but with its own styling.)
Buick
Vehicles from this division should be about the ride and not the performance. All models should have leather, wood-grained accents, climate control, and an excellent sound system. However the hood should have nothing more than a dependable V6. With only an adequate engine Buick could offer an unrivaled riding experience on an affordable level.
The Good: LeSabre, Park Avenue, and Rendezvous.
The Bad: Terraza (Why does this division have a van? Get rid of it.)
The Could be Better: LaCrosse (Interior is excellent, but exterior leaves much to be desired.) Rainier (Interior should be brought up to par.)
The Should be Added: Velite (The idea is right. I plush four-seat coupe/convertible would fit well in this division.)
Cadillac
It’s the ultimate in luxury and performance. The Cadillac name and badge carry an awe with the American people. The new designs of the past three years are excellent. Cadillac is on the perfect course.
The Good: All vehicles once STS replaces Seville.
The Bad: You find something.
The Could be Better: More V-Series as quick as you can.
The Should be Added: A more affordable, by Cadillac standards, Coupe/Convertible.
Oldsmobile R.I.P.
May the most generic brand in America Rest In Peace. I can't say I'll miss it.
Those are my views and opinions agree or disagree if you like.
