GM Inside News Forum banner
1 - 20 of 124 Posts

·
Editor
Joined
·
26,951 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 · (Edited)
GMI Drives: 2011 Buick Regal Turbo Six-Speed Manual
The manual provides an interesting blend of driving excitement and fuel thriftiness.
www.GMInsideNews.com
May 16, 2011
By: Nick Saporito


By now it’s no secret that Buick has a new lease on life. After an extended stint as the official hauler of people past the legal retirement age, the brand that once brought the U.S. T-Type and GNX cars has awoken once again. Undoubtedly the biggest emblem of Buick’s resurrection as a more youthful brand has been the recently launched Regal Turbo.

As if the words "Buick", "turbocharged" and "adaptive suspension" were not enough to capture the attention of non-traditional Buick buyers, the phrase "manual transmission" should certainly seem compelling to automotive enthusiasts. However, just having the shift-it-yourself option on the order guide is not enough. The Regal Turbo must walk the walk to win over enthusiasts. GMI set out to see if the manual-equipped Regal really does give Buick real credentials with the enthusiast crowd.

At the turn of the New Year, GMI tested a white Regal Turbo with the automatic transmission. As our review reflected, overall we enjoyed the car quite a bit and favored it over the anemic 2.4-liter Regal. With that said, we had several qualms with the engine, including a lack of refinement and turbo lag. Surprisingly, the same car with a manual transmission eases those concerns in a more fun to drive package that also provides better fuel economy.

It turns out that the lack of refinement we noted in our first 2.0-liter turbo tester may have been confined to that car exclusively. Our manual tester was consistently much quieter than the previous automatic version. Our manual tester exhibited only an appropriate level of turbo whine at high revs- just enough to remind you of what you paid for.

While the Opel-derived engine is a bit coarse at idle, the combination of engine note and faint turbo whine sounds good at higher revs.

We also noted considerable turbo lag in the automatic tester we had. While the manual still has some lag, it is not quite as noticeable. The 2.0 turbo really needs to be north of 2,000 RPM for the turbo to kick in. Off- the-line performance with both transmissions is on the weak side for our tastes, but the manual does allow the driver to keep the 2.0-liter in its sweet spots above 2,000 RPM. This makes the car feel considerably faster than the automatic.


From a dead stop, first gear never really seems to allow the engine to get to one of those sweet spots, even when the tachometer is above 2,000 RPM. Once in second, the driver knows what is going on from the faint whine of the turbocharger spooling up and quicker acceleration. Third gear also provides a similar burst of boost under hard acceleration. Fourth gear can also keep the engine in an entertaining spot under high-speed conditions, while fifth and six should be reserved for highway cruising.

The bottom line with this manual is that second and third gear typically do an excellent job at putting a smile on the face of the driver and leaves them wondering if they really are in a Buick product. The key to fun with this car is keeping the 2.0-liter revving between 2,000 and 5,000 RPM, which is easy to accomplish with the manual. While the automatic is not boring, having the ability to force the turbo (pun intended) to do what it does best makes the manual worthy for enthusiasts.

Fun factor aside, the manual also makes for a very easy to drive car. The clutch feel on the Regal Turbo is extremely linear with a great balance of weight. Pedal positioning is also great, meaning you can even heel-toe this Buick if you feel the need.

Shift feel is also good with a fairly "notchy" sensation, but the throws are too long for performance driving. To be fair, the Regal Turbo isn’t intended to be a short-throw performance car, but the upcoming GS model will need to offer less distance between the gates.

Driving in traffic can be a dreadful task with a manual transmission, but the Regal handles it well. The car does not take a tremendous amount of revs for the flywheel and transmission to hit their friction point, so it's rarely ever jumpy during shifts. The only problem spot we found in traffic was when in first gear; going under 10 MPH the engine gets choked up without clutch use.

All Regal's come standard with an electronic parking brake. Despite our initial hesitate of having the unconventional brake with the manual shifter, it works well. We could not find any limiting factor with the combination of the electronic brake and manual, even hill-holds can be accomplished with ease.

Another area of excellence with this powertrain is the fuel economy. The Regal Turbo with the manual sports EPA ratings of 20-MPG city/32-MPG highway, a considerable improvement over the automatic. During our testing we had absolutely no problem meeting or exceeding the EPA ratings. In fact, we averaged as high as 35.1-MPG on one highway trip with the car. We were almost perplexed by how easy it was to get good fuel economy out of the 2.0-liter, even when driving more on the "enthusiastic" side. The EPA has clearly rated the Regal Turbo correctly.


In every Regal review we’ve mentioned the excellence of the chassis that underpins this car. With the base model car we said it almost had too much chassis for the engine. We also said we felt the automatic turbo was a good mate for the balanced chassis. The manual turbo improves upon this combination.

While on an on-ramp going about 45 MPH in sixth, we slipped the Regal down to second gear and found it met with an instant burst of acceleration, wrapping the Regal around the fairly sharp right curve of the ramp. During the entire maneuver, the car never lost composure and body roll was almost nonexistent in the car’s "sport" mode. The Regal chassis provides excellent road feedback and the steering has a nice weighted feel to it that also provides a decent amount of responsiveness. All of those attributes collide to make the Regal Turbo feel lighter-footed than the car's hefty curb weight suggests.

The Regal Turbo has an optional interactive drive control system (IDCS) that allows the driver to select between normal, sport and tour modes. Each mode alters the suspension, throttle response and steering of the car. As we noted in the automatic review, the system really does make a noticeable difference.


The inside of this Regal tester was, well... much like the automatic. However, this model was sporting the black interior, a look that we greatly prefer over the tan. While the tan interior features large amounts of faux wood, the black has piano black finishes in the place of the wood. The black on black combination, with tasteful chrome accents throughout, make the interior look more premium to us.

Our tester was also equipped with the optional navigation system. Unlike every other GM navigation system, the Regal does not feature a touch screen interface. Instead, the entire UI is navigated via an iDrive like knob mounted on the center console. We would prefer a touch screen, though the knob is nice to use to scroll through music on your connected iPod.

Overall we walked away from the Regal Turbo manual thinking that the car is worthy of the consideration of enthusiasts. This vehicle isn't a performance car and while it does have a few minor quirks, it is both entertaining to drive and frugal in its fuel consumption.

As we sit here staring at $4.00 per gallon gas, the Regal Turbo looks like the perfect compromise for enthusiasts wanting a fun sedan with a balanced chassis and manual transmission.


2011 Buick Regal Turbo 6MT (German Production)
Base Price: $29,720.00 (inc. destination charges)
Options: TO7 Package
MSRP: $35,605.00
EPA Ratings: 20 MPG City / 32 MPG Highway
Observed Fuel Economy:


Pros: Fun to drive, excellent fuel economy and a great interior.

Cons: Minor quirks with the transmission, weak low end power and no touch-screen infotainment.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
438 Posts
test drove a turbo auto Regal last week. Found the car to be quite peppy...a little lag with the turbo taking off. All in all a nice, solid well built car. Still waiting for the GS.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
11,998 Posts
nsap's review is great as it always is.

Very nice car too, but I don't know that I could swallow a 35K pricetag for this particular dose of driving enjoyment. Hopefully many will.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,845 Posts
Good review. With the turbo lag, in my experience with several different turbo sports cars, there is always some lag below 2000 rpm's. So, this wouldn't be a problem for me. Can't wait for the updated 2.0T now!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
149 Posts
Are the MPG stats based on actual fuel consumption or the D.I.C. readings?

How accurate is the D.I.C. fro MPG?

Very nice review and thank you, I would like to see some performance numbers obtained with a G-Tech type device. Although not 100% accurate it would give us baseline results if the same device was used for every car you test.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
78 Posts
Great review - and thanks very much for showing your fuel economy results in that format. It's very helpful and appreciated!

(for those of us who spend long periods of interstate time at those speeds!)

I remain hopeful for the GS being much more of a performance Buick.

With some better exterior and interior colors (red!).
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
243 Posts
Great review - and thanks very much for showing your fuel economy results in that format. It's very helpful and appreciated!

(for those of us who spend long periods of interstate time at those speeds!)
Agreed. I wish I had seen something similar for the Cruze 1.4T A6 before buying. Not that I am not happy with the Car, I would just have more realistic expectations for what the car can do at 70, and not what the stickers says for 55.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1 Posts
I think this review is pretty spot on. I purchased a Regal Turbo with the manual transmission about 6 weeks ago. It definitely does NOT have a sweet spot in first gear, and I suspect the car has been programmed that way (in part) to prevent significant over steer due to the available torque. Sadly, I am sure this issue is what prevents the Regal from having a better 0-60 time. One you hit second gear though, you can really feel the car pull forward. And there is a huge difference between the manual and automatic, the lag issues are gone. The suspension and steering are pretty good, too, although the feel at highway speeds is still a bit loose, IMHO. The handling remains very solid and the braking on the car is among the smoothest in any car I've had, which is great considering its significant weight.

While the car is definitely not in the same performance league as an Infiniti G37 or BMW 335i, I think it is certainly comparable to the Audi A4s and Acura TSX. I got mine just with the TO2 package (sunroof) only, and with some patience, negotiation and rebates, my final cost was a little above 28K. That was a better deal than the Acura, and a far better deal than the Audi A4. The only other car which I found as fun to drive was the VW CC, but that vehicle has some very serious blind spots when backing up, and the fact you can only seat two in the back was a deal breaker for a $30k-ish car. Furthermore, although I think the interiors of the VW CC are just gorgeous, I personally felt the exteriors look really squat from behind.

In contrast, the Regal is just a very refined and almost minimalistic design. Based on photos, I thought it looked okay, but once I saw the car in real life I just thought the car looked very sharp. Plus, although I chose not to with my vehicle, you can get a fully loaded Regal Turbo with all the bells and whistles. Most of the other comparable brands limit a stick shift to the lowest model (which, in all fairness, means still pretty well loaded for cars in this bracket).

I suspect in the next year or two, after they release the Regal GS, they'll continually up the HP on the turbo models and continue to tweak the gearing on both the manual and the automatic. They are very nice now, but could still be a bit more performance oriented.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,632 Posts
Interesting review. Can't help but think the 2.0 liter turbo will find a happier home in the upcoming Verano and that the 250 plus HP improved version can't come soon enough. The stick certainly makes this car better. Too bad they will only sell a handful. Have been looking long and hard for a stick but haven't seen one yet at any Buick dealer. Perhaps by Summer one or two will show up. My ideal Regal would be a 2012 250 HP 2.0 liter T Crystal red with the more upscale looking tan and wood interior. The black in the pictures looks too black and plain for my tastes and the piano shiny plastic will look terrible in no time. Hopefully Buick builds such a car in the upcoming months.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,331 Posts
I like everything about the car but the wheels. A little too boring and solid--needs more open space IMO. The gunmetal wheels on the high-end Sonata look much nicer and sportier for example.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,874 Posts
Sounds just like my 9-3 Aero manual. Nice review.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,822 Posts
nsap's review is great as it always is.

Very nice car too, but I don't know that I could swallow a 35K pricetag for this particular dose of driving enjoyment. Hopefully many will.
Exactly what you'd expect someone driving a Dodge Charger to say....
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
11,998 Posts
I like everything about the car but the wheels. A little too boring ...
My ideal Regal would be a 2012 250 HP 2.0 liter T Crystal red with the more upscale looking tan and wood interior. The black in the pictures looks too black and plain for my tastes and the piano shiny plastic will look terrible in no time.
You both bring up something I wish GM would've done, and that's a bit more complete Insignia for us. Ours already lacks the V-6 option and AWD, but we don't get the nice wheels or interesting interior/exterior colors either. Kinda unfortunate.

Exactly what you'd expect someone driving a Dodge Charger to say....
My father and family friend who also own Chargers would argue, I think. ;)
 
1 - 20 of 124 Posts
Top