Originally posted by bigals87z28+Mar 28 2004, 10:11 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (bigals87z28 @ Mar 28 2004, 10:11 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-actionjack@Mar 28 2004, 01:26 PM
I like the 2nd. GM desperately needs something that is retro. The Camaro should be it.
The only reason I have been able to phatom for why GM does not do something retro is because it would cost them extra in design and die making. "cheap asses".
GM and Lutz
lasma:

The SSR, HHR, and Nomad concept was plenty retro for me. I wouldnt call them cheap at all. They want to make money, not blow it away on some dead end retro design. Get over it.
Anyway, very nice.
-On that first one, the 70-73 grill is a bit too much for my taste. Id like for the grill to get smaller, and lower.
-The 2nd ones roof looks a little goofy. Give it more of a smooth, streamlined design. Also, seperate the lights from the grill. And the front end looks like a cattle plow on the front of a train. Give it some more deffinition. Make the headlights larger. I keep seeing mre and more 5th gen Concepets with small, beedy headlights. Make them big!! The first one had a good set up over all, I really liked it, but that grill looks like its trout. I guess thats evolution from the cat fish design of the 4th gen... hehehe. [/b][/quote]
Once again I agree with this guy. GM needs 2 move 4ward with it's designs.
Wasn't the "Bel-Air" retro??