Joined
·
23,308 Posts
i don't care what 'design philosophy' a car follows... if it's ugly it's ugly and if it's beautiful it's beautiful. i sure can't say retro cars are ugly because it totally depends on how it's handled. same with caddy's art & science. i like everything they've done so far, but that doesn't mean i'll like every future interpretation. i never did understand chryslers 'cab-forward'... i didn't see any difference between them and other sedans.
i can also understand why a company would pull on past glories. there are some classic GM's that deserve a nod from the curret generation. GM wouldn't be what it is today (or be at all) if it weren't for the millions of cars it's built over the years. so bring on retro... if i don't like it i won't buy it.
i can also understand why a company would pull on past glories. there are some classic GM's that deserve a nod from the curret generation. GM wouldn't be what it is today (or be at all) if it weren't for the millions of cars it's built over the years. so bring on retro... if i don't like it i won't buy it.