GM Inside News Forum banner
1 - 20 of 74 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
13,069 Posts
Re: Ford’s radical transformation By P. M. De Lorenzo

Spot on.

Some numbers for your consideration:

Ford's Q1 revenue: 43.5B
GM's Q1 revenue: 42.6B

Ford's Q1 operating profit: 2.6B
GM's Q1 operating LOSS: (589)M

Ford's Q1 cash on hand: 33.8B
GM's Q1 cash on hand: 21.6B

Ford's Q1 Cash Burn: 1.5B
GM's Q1 Cash Burn: 3.2B
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
1,419 Posts
Re: Ford’s radical transformation By P. M. De Lorenzo

My first new car was a 2004 Ford Focus. I loved it.

I will buy a Ford again in a heartbeat. And GM is taking so fricking long to bring the Beat (and the beat is UGLY). I think I will probably buy a Fiesta if Ford can get it here fast enough. That little car is sweet.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
12,770 Posts
The only way I can best describe just how radical Ford’s future product push is in terms that even the casual observer of the auto biz can understand is that what Mulally and his team have done is actually skipped a model cycle with these new cars headed for the U.S. market, so instead of doing a series of baby-step changes over the next three years, Ford will bring its 2012-2014 products forward to the 2010-2011 time frame in a blaze of models and configurations that will set the U.S. market - and its competitors - on its ear.

We’re talking a full range of smaller, more efficient sedans, sport coupes, crossovers, people movers and even urban delivery vehicles that will change people’s perceptions of what the Ford Motor Company is almost overnight.

Will Ford still make trucks and some larger vehicles? Absolutely. There will be a core group of American pickup buyers needing the vehicles for work applications, so that business will remain steady for the foreseeable future. It will be a much smaller market than what it once was, but it will still be viable for years to come nonetheless.
The sad thing is that GM is capable of this. They have great fuel-saving, stylish, and affordable product overseas at Opel, GM do Brasil, and yes, even GM Daewoo (one reason why Chevrolet Europe is finally booming). But with "Americans don't want small cars" Bob Lutz at the product helm, and questionable decisions by Rick Wagoner make me think "baby steps" --- kicking and screaming and protesting all the way --- is all GM will actually accomplish.

Sitting in the corner, pouting, arms folded, baby-stepping their vehicles down from full size truck-based SUVs into the next largest segment: Giant 8-passenger crossovers that get only moderately better fuel economy and still cost around $40,000....that is GM's apparent plan. Who know's maybe it will work. With an the eggs-in-a-basket Volt (in an industry plagued by battery supply fears), and a trickle of other good product, weighed down by super-sized Crossovers (even the Equinox is getting larger, which is amazing in this environment), they drag their feet against a rebirth. GM's is hardly the stuff of radical moves like Ford's to change their image. Bob Lutz's nonchalant crushing of GM Minicar hopes for U.S., with a shrug and a "we never planned to sell them here anyway, glad you liked the poll" attitude is just a tiny glimpse into the mentality at GM.

Waiting for that glorious reversal in gas prices that is long-lived, or waiting for Americans to get used to $4 gasoline, hoping that Americans will keep buying far more and far bigger than they actually need. That's GM's plan. After years and years of making $10,000 profit on mega SUV's you would figure that they could have worked another angle to make profitable cars. Like tech-packed smaller cars targeted to trendy Apple fanatics, for instance.

Instead of chasing the consumer and trying to get a small, young family into what they really need, like a Zafira or something even smaller, they'll keep pushing (with the help of dealers looking for the up-sell) for Americans to buy the "bigger is better" mentality like it was 1999.

All that, in the face of the crazy popularity (1 day on dealer lots) of premium small cars like the MINI.

And before you say that "no one expected this, it will take years to change" - go look at my Commentaries here dating back to 2004. GM had fair warning from all corners of the web, but they chose to ignore it for their cash cows.

I've never been a Blue Oval fan, mainly because they were even worse than GM with their hyper-dependence on selling glorified farm vehicles to suburbanites, and bone-headed moves like cutting the Focus Wagon while salesmen admitted to me that the ones they ordered always went quick (but in so many words they preferred up-selling potential wagon buyers into Escapes and Explorers)....but in just a few articles reading about what Mullaly is doing? I'm quickly becoming a Ford fan...

Why? Because I've long wanted an American car maker to stand toe to toe with the Japanese and Europeans and prove that an American-headquarted car company in Detroit can build the world's greatest cars again- even small cars , not just the most profitable excess-mobiles. And Ford seems prepared to do just that.

Time for a round of applause for Ford:

 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
9,172 Posts
Re: Ford’s radical transformation By P. M. De Lorenzo

Great find. Thank you for posting this.

Article quote:

Mulally could have made a series of incremental steps, which is part and parcel of the Rick Wagoner school of “managing the downward spiral,” but he knew if he hesitated or made only gradual moves then Ford wouldn’t be around long enough for it to matter. So instead Mulally emboldened his team with marching orders that did away with the word “transition” and instead focused their raison d’etre on the word transformation, and the results will be truly breathtaking to see, to the point that Ford’s product lineup will bear little resemblance to today’s lineup in just 24 months.

The only way I can best describe just how radical Ford’s future product push is in terms that even the casual observer of the auto biz can understand is that what Mulally and his team have done is actually skipped a model cycle with these new cars headed for the U.S. market, so instead of doing a series of baby-step changes over the next three years, Ford will bring its 2012-2014 products forward to the 2010-2011 time frame in a blaze of models and configurations that will set the U.S. market - and its competitors - on its ear.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,516 Posts
Ford also made the right move to dump Jaguar and Land Rover.

Now if only GM would dump Saab and Hummer.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,097 Posts
It is clear that Ford is on the right track. I've had better ownership experiences with my Fords than with the GMC I used to own (my current ride is a Fusion and it is a wonderful daily driver). And the new Fords slated to come out over the next couple of years seem more appealing to me. They look to be attractively styled with high quality interiors, offering plenty of utility (with hatchback and wagon models), and hopefully retain the fun handling that has been a hallmark of the Focus and other EU Fords.

I trust that combining volumes of EU cars with the US market will help them produce these smaller cars profitably, and I hope that US consumers can embrace Ford again. But if they are on the vanguard of mass volumes of small fuel efficient cars, they might be able to beat many others to market and gain back a slice of marketshare (at the expense of chrysler certainly, and probably GM).
 

· Banned
Joined
·
110 Posts
after purchasing a ford taurus x limited i was amazed at the interior and good driving feel im confy looks good and my only gm choice was the cad-srx --$$$--my honda odessy
is not build as tight i can push on dash and see it loose, some trim is not perfect alignned
cant adjust the seat to me, is a porker & a bit slow unless your on top of the rpm's.

I can only agree the quality and ride
 

· Registered
Joined
·
13,069 Posts
Re: Ford’s radical transformation By P. M. De Lorenzo

Goes to show what the right management can do for a company.

It all started under Bill Ford, whose primary goal was to get Ford's quality on par with Honda and Toyota. He succeeded.

Alan Mullally as CEO sets the tone, and has the clout to tell people to get with the program or they're fired.

Derek Kuzak (Ford's global product czar) decides what cars and trucks to build, which takes the decisions out of the hands of local operations. This way, global product lines are unified, and cost are significantly reduced. Their development budget for their C and CD cars was literally cut in half by merging the Focus and Fusion/Mondeo from four products to two products.

Jim Farley is the chief marketing officer who figures out how to position brands and sell cars.

Mark Fields is the president of North American operations, and has the knowledge of what Americans want (he got FNA on board with the Fiesta back when Bill Ford was CEO).

---

Now, within 24 months, Ford will be one product line worldwide, with each country having the products its consumers want. In the US, Mercury will be selling premium small cars, and Lincoln will be selling premium large cars under the same roof. Since they use parts and platforms shared with global Fords, they can be easily expanded into markets like China, Russia, the Middle East, and Africa.

On the downside, GM has the Camaro.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
13,369 Posts
Related to this news is my long time wondering of one point: If GM never intended to sell the Beat, or any of the Triplets here, why all the Big Hoopla about voting for them? The Beat won...but instead of "Thanks John Q. Public for voting, we're building the Beat pronto" we got "Americans don't want small cars, we never intended to build any of the three here anyway.....so go buy a Yaris and a Fit (implied)". And Wagoner got a 64% wage INCREASE? To HOW many millions each year for these industry-shaking decisions of his?
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
12,770 Posts
Well said, wescoent. Alan is my new hero. Someone who is ready to bring the glory back to Detroit, with some help from their family overseas.

And to think, only 4 or 5 years ago, I thought Ford was incapable of change, and heading into the toilet, clutching a Ford Explorer emblem on their way down the pipe.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
243 Posts
Beat
886,131
Groove
745,548
Trax
279,276

Hey Bob, look, 1,910,955 MILLION PEOPLED voted. Want to assume at least SOME percentage of the 1- almost 2- Million would want to buy a Beat?!

idiot.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,252 Posts
"Lincoln will be selling premium large cars under the same roof. " - oh please, lincoln has been in the bottom of the outhouse for 7 years and this won't change in the new plan. Seems like ford is simply aping nissan and ghosn. CASH Hordes have the most effect on success in the auto industry - CASH and lots of it- That is why japan, inc. will rule for a LONG while. In the same way GM used its superior resources to drive a whole host of US carmakers out of business in the 1950's.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
7,987 Posts
Re: Ford’s radical transformation By P. M. De Lorenzo

Ford actually does look to be on the right track. Maybe their new engines will finally be adequate, my mom's 3.0L Fusion is horribly underpowered and my brother's 4.6L Mustang seems way too heavy for its power.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
6,483 Posts
Ok, please tell me what the BILLIONS sunk into Cadillac has accomplished. Short of the CTS, which Cadillac is a gotta have by the MB/BMW minions of this planet???

How is Cadillacs market saturation in Europe???

They have 1 ton notch product. ONE. And Ford is the stupid one???

By this time next year, Lincoln will have another new product, the MKT. Sometime soon thereafter, there will be the MKR (yes it was greenlighted). The MKZ gets a heavy refresh in December.

Just because all of the Lincoln cars do not float your boat, does not mean that the brand is irrelevent. How many new Cadillacs have you bought lately?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
13,069 Posts
Re: Ford’s radical transformation By P. M. De Lorenzo

Well said, wescoent. Alan is my new hero. Someone who is ready to bring the glory back to Detroit, with some help from their family overseas.

And to think, only 4 or 5 years ago, I thought Ford was incapable of change, and heading into the toilet, clutching a Ford Explorer emblem on their way down the pipe.
My thoughts as well. Their business was dysfunctional almost beyond belief, and now they're moving towards becoming the industry model.

Even the Explorer has gotten with the program. 2 years ago, they realized that 90% of Explorer buyers never use the truck for the heavy off-roading and towing it was designed for, so why waste engineering dollars and fuel economy by keeping it the way it was? They took what people liked about the Explorer (truck-ish looks, high ride height, great visibility, flexible interior), and simply translated it into a car-based design, with I4 and V6 engines.

They also had the foresight to design a "tweener" truck to give buyers the F-Series name and much of its capability in a smaller and more fuel-efficient design... as well as to pick up orphaned Explorer Sport-Trac owners. F-100 is coming along very nicely in development.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
13,069 Posts
Re: Ford’s radical transformation By P. M. De Lorenzo

"Lincoln will be selling premium large cars under the same roof. " - oh please, lincoln has been in the bottom of the outhouse for 7 years and this won't change in the new plan. Seems like ford is simply aping nissan and ghosn. CASH Hordes have the most effect on success in the auto industry - CASH and lots of it- That is why japan, inc. will rule for a LONG while. In the same way GM used its superior resources to drive a whole host of US carmakers out of business in the 1950's.
Well, then it's a good thing Ford got a nice big cash loan a couple of years ago, (just in case something like this would happen) before the credit market locked up.

Ford's cash position is MILES ahead of GM's (refer my first post), and you can have all the cash you want... it won't matter if your product management is clueless. GM is a CLASSIC case study in business school of being king of your world and sitting on a mountain of cash, but throwing it all away due to poor product management.

Toyota is making the same bone-headed mistakes, and are going to pay for it.
 
1 - 20 of 74 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top