GM Inside News Forum banner
1 - 16 of 16 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
4,391 Posts
First Drive: 2010 Chevrolet Camaro V6 Prototype

It feels good to be on the other side. Recently, we got a chance to pilot a 2010 Chevrolet Camaro V6 Prototype out on the public highways and byways of southeastern Michigan.

Typically, we're on the other side of this game, pestering development engineers and posting spy shots of some car just like these engineering prototypes of the 2010 Chevrolet Camaro V6. Heck, as far as we know, we might have run pictures of one or both of these very automobiles.

Yes, these two bits of spy bait still had matte-black camouflage panels (one with triangles made of what looked like white shoe polish), ill-fitting bumper covers, no Chevy bowtie and a bunch of small makeshift headlight elements, all of which taken collectively look a little bit like a rash.

But what do we care? We're driving the 2010 Chevrolet Camaro!

Progress Report
So these prototype cars were rough. Real rough.

How rough? Well, the car with the Aisin-built six-speed manual transmission carried a steering wheel with shift paddles on it. Wait...what? "Oh that," said our passenger, Camaro Chief Engineer Doug Houlihan. "That's a wheel for an automatic car they just threw in here."

And we must say for the record that we will be a bit circumspect about making any major pronouncements about what the production vehicle will be like based on this early drive.

The 2010 Chevrolet Camaro V6 will not be the lowly poseur's car we've come to expect of the small-engine pony car.

Oh wait, circumspect, right? OK. Well, let's say that if all the parts and pieces come together as planned and the engineers' estimates prove accurate then the 2010 Chevrolet Camaro V6 will not be the lowly...and so forth and so on.

Not the Executive Assistant's Car
The long-standing tradition in pony car circles is to utterly dismiss the six-cylinder version as the ride of choice for sorority girls or guys who are into the vocal stylings of Huey Lewis. When Chevrolet released specifics on the new Camaro, though, the performance details for the V6 model were certainly more surprising than those of the V8.

The 3.6-liter direct-injection V6 is the same 304-horsepower engine as the upgrade engine choice in the Cadillac CTS. Officially, General Motors is saying that the Camaro V6 will make 300 hp even. Except any time you talk to the engineers, they just give you the look and say, "Well...," and then they stop short. So expect a few hp above the magic 300 mark.

Either way, it wasn't that long ago that 300 hp was a number for V8 output. It still is for the Mustang GT's V8 — at least until an upgraded version arrives in the 2010 model. This is 90 hp more than Ford's current Mustang V6 option and, perhaps more distressingly, about 50 hp more than the V6 in the newly introduced Dodge Challenger SE.

Further, the V6 Camaro won't be short on gears (six), or wheel size (18 inches standard) or appeal (use your eyes).

Paint by Numbers
The acceleration numbers we pulled on the 2009 Challenger SE with its mandatory four-speed automatic transmission were as unimpressive as you would expect from a 3,819-pound car with a 250-hp engine. Zero to 60 takes 8.1 seconds. The SE eats up 16.1 seconds traveling through the quarter-mile.

Chevrolet is estimating that the V6 Camaro can get to 60 mph in 6.1 seconds and complete the quarter in 14.4 seconds. That's with either the standard six-speed manual or the optional six-speed automatic. Houlihan thinks that with final tweaking, his team will be able to get that figure down to 5.9 seconds to 60 mph. That's not going to be enough to beat a 350Z, but it would surely take down a Mazda RX-8.

Even accounting for the not exactly impartial source of this information, it's pretty clear the 2010 Chevrolet Camaro V6 will be quick enough to at least get a car enthusiast's attention.



Source: http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/d...Id=131090?tid=edmunds.il.home.photopanel..1.*

Video & Photos at link ^
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,802 Posts
Needs a turbo model for the enthusiasts.

It's probably going to be un-fun and expensive to squeeze HP out of that 3.6L DOHC.

Y not just get the 8?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
5,425 Posts
Needs a turbo model for the enthusiasts.

It's probably going to be un-fun and expensive to squeeze HP out of that 3.6L DOHC.
.....which is why people with tuning on their minds will probably just pony up for one of the V8 models instead ;)
 

· Registered
Joined
·
4,391 Posts
Discussion Starter · #6 ·
Needs a turbo model for the enthusiasts.

It's probably going to be un-fun and expensive to squeeze HP out of that 3.6L DOHC.
I agree the RS package for the V6 should have a turbo charger! And the RS package for the SS should have a supercharger!
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,256 Posts
Only a few more months.......I can't wait!
 

· Super Moderator
Joined
·
11,051 Posts
Encouraging.

I hope that GM also decides to throw the 260hp 2.0T into the mix eventually. Besides helping to lower the transaction price and helping on the CAFE side of the equation, it could also help introduce an entirely new segment of carbuyers to the Camaro banner. I could just imagine the kind of aftermarket support that would pop up overnight to tweak the turbo or offer aftermarket accessories, etc.

A buddy of mine used to have a GTI 1.8T and we used to go to WaterFest every year at Englishtown/Raceway park here in Jersey. The amount of folks who would come out to get their engine mapping program tweaked for more power was ridiculous. GM could create a similar following with a 2.0T Camaro. They should just do it!
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,514 Posts
I can do without lag and added complexity of turbos thank you very much. I'd MUCH prefer a N/A V-8. A turbo V-6 doesn't sound nearly as nice as a V-8 with dual exhaust anyways.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,301 Posts
Encouraging.

I hope that GM also decides to throw the 260hp 2.0T into the mix eventually. Besides helping to lower the transaction price and helping on the CAFE side of the equation, it could also help introduce an entirely new segment of carbuyers to the Camaro banner. I could just imagine the kind of aftermarket support that would pop up overnight to tweak the turbo or offer aftermarket accessories, etc.

A buddy of mine used to have a GTI 1.8T and we used to go to WaterFest every year at Englishtown/Raceway park here in Jersey. The amount of folks who would come out to get their engine mapping program tweaked for more power was ridiculous. GM could create a similar following with a 2.0T Camaro. They should just do it!
while i'm a fellow turbo lover and think it would be interesting; it's doomed to failure. think about it, a 3800lbs car with a 260 hp turbo 4? and no matter how stout the ecotec is, the Camaro is no 2800lbs Silvia/240sx.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,683 Posts
I'm sorry but when you go through an article and they say things like "we were expecting" in a negative way, you know there is alot of bias going on. This was not a very good review. Every other review has it driving, looking, sounding like a dream and then edmunds comes in and talks crap. Sounds like they have a bad memory of camaros
 

· Registered
Joined
·
341 Posts
"Being able to shift from both the steering wheel and the shifter would add cost. (With the Camaro V6's projected starting price "in the low $20s," we're not able to swallow this rationalization.)"

I was expecting the V6 base price to be more in the $24-$25k range due to the 3.6HF DI being standard on the V6 model, however if the GM execs who were riding along with Edmunds when they were test-driving the prototype are revealing a base price in the low $20s then this is an extemely pleasant surprise and will without question make the Camaro a huge success. :yup:
 
1 - 16 of 16 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top