That looks terrible, GTO lives forever!!
Noticed that PHR implied that the Camaro is a "kids car" in the article, which is a key reason it died. Interesting. Kind of expect that from C&D, not PHR. BUt I suppose the truth is the truth no matter where you read it.Originally posted by bigals87z28@Feb 14 2004, 01:14 AM
Anyone see it? Ill look for it on there website. It looked awesome! The rear could use a little work on a profile shot, but the whole shape and design of the car looks great, and guess what! THEY DIDNT HAVE TO MAKE A RETROMOBILE TO DO IT!! NOVEL IDEA EH?
Noticed that PHR implied that the Camaro is a "kids car" in the article, which is a key reason it died. Interesting. Kind of expect that from C&D, not PHR. BUt I suppose the truth is the truth no matter where you read it.Originally posted by desmo9+Feb 14 2004, 05:24 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (desmo9 @ Feb 14 2004, 05:24 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-bigals87z28@Feb 14 2004, 01:14 AM
Anyone see it? Ill look for it on there website. It looked awesome! The rear could use a little work on a profile shot, but the whole shape and design of the car looks great, and guess what! THEY DIDNT HAVE TO MAKE A RETROMOBILE TO DO IT!! NOVEL IDEA EH?
The new 05' Mustang is excellent. Just because you are a GM fan I'd appreciate you not ranting on a great car. Now I've said my opinions on the GTO and what not and admitted where I was wrong but mind keeping this "THEY DIDNT HAVE TO MAKE A RETROMOBILE TO DO IT!! NOVEL IDEA EH?" to yourself buddy. If you can't accept that the new 05' is a masterpiece, then you must be blind. This Charger concept is awsome btw. Thank you for finding it. I posted a link to it on BON.Originally posted by bigals87z28@Feb 14 2004, 01:14 AM
Anyone see it? Ill look for it on there website. It looked awesome! The rear could use a little work on a profile shot, but the whole shape and design of the car looks great, and guess what! THEY DIDNT HAVE TO MAKE A RETROMOBILE TO DO IT!! NOVEL IDEA EH?
Pure opinion. Myself, being born in 83 and growing up around the late Fox body and SN95s, I think the retro 05 is ugly. I prefer the 99-04 over any of the previous Mustangs.Originally posted by StevenJ@Feb 14 2004, 04:21 PM
If you can't accept that the new 05' is a masterpiece, then you must be blind.
I dunno about 87. I wouldnt go lower then 89. It has about 10:1 compression. My Z has 9.5:1, and If I put less then 89, it will ping and knock.Originally posted by StevenJ@Feb 15 2004, 01:23 AM
Even if you don't like the styling, mechanically it is still a feat. 300 hp, 318 lbs torque, a BMW like front suspension, and it still runs on 87 octane. It certainly is well engineered.