GM Inside News Forum banner

Daewoo: GM's Hot New Engine

3.7K views 14 replies 15 participants last post by  gmsickofan  
#1 ·
Daewoo: GM's Hot New Engine
Moon Ihlwan, Gail Edmondson and David Welch
Business Week Online

Image


Remember Daewoo Motor Co.? It's the Korean auto maker that hired college kids to hawk its cars, built factories in unlikely locales such as Uzbekistan, Vietnam, and Ukraine, and once tried to woo British buyers with an offer of a free trade-in for a new model after just six months of ownership. Daewoo invested billions building a global capacity of some 2 million cars annually -- a number it never even got close to producing -- before collapsing under more than $16 billion debt in 1999. Production plunged by half, 7,000 workers lost their jobs, and scores of suppliers went belly-up.

End of story? Hardly. Today, Daewoo is back, under new ownership, and is rolling like never before. Since General Motors Corp. (GM ) bought a controlling interest in bankrupt Daewoo in October, 2002, the rechristened GM Daewoo Auto & Technology Co. has emerged as one of the most promising spots in the Detroit carmaker's empire. Even as Korea's home auto market has contracted by 30% over the past two years, GM Daewoo's sales are soaring. In the first 10 months of this year, it exported 632,000 cars and kits for assembly elsewhere, up 90% from the same period in 2003. It'll be tough to match that performance, but the company expects double-digit growth for several years to come. Although GM Daewoo declines to provide financial details, execs say the company remains in the red but that the earnings picture is improving rapidly. "We are confident we will achieve stable financial health and self-sustainability," says Joseph G. Peter, chief financial officer at GM Daewoo.

Image


In fact, GM's Korean subsidiary is becoming a linchpin in its plans for global expansion. GM Daewoo's cars are sold in more than 140 countries. Across Asia, they have helped increase GM's market share to 5.2% -- up from 4.2% two years ago. And in Europe, the company's five models are being pitched as high-quality, low-cost alternatives to local brands. The Korean operation "gives General Motors the opportunity to truly grow sales in Asia and in the value-market segments in Europe," says Alan S. Batey, chief of GM Daewoo's marketing.

For their money, GM and two partners got 70% of an operation that included two modern factories capable of making a total of 475,000 vehicles a year and the company's smaller facility in Hanoi.

Considering the bargain-basement price, GM execs say they were "pleasantly surprised" by what they found at Daewoo. GM imported its production, supply, quality control, and information technology systems, but the workers needed relatively little retraining. Having seen the layoffs after the company's collapse, the remaining laborers were quick to adapt to the cost-cutting and efficiency-boosting measures GM implemented -- especially as exports took off. "Our attitude has changed to 'our factory' from 'their factory,' and we saw our sacked colleagues returning as we got more work to do," says Kim Sang Hyun, production manager at the Bupyung plant.

Now, GM is retooling much of Daewoo's lineup. It has set aside $1.5 billion to build new transmission and engine plants and to develop a string of new models to be rolled out over the next two years. The first, a new Matiz minicar, is due out in Europe and Korea next spring. In 2006, GM Daewoo is planning a diesel-powered sport utility vehicle code-named S3X. And next April it's planning to unveil a new model at the Seoul Motor Show but hasn't released any details.

With GM reeling in the U.S. under the weight of pension and health-care costs, Daewoo will have to stand on its own feet. But shipments keep going up -- and the old Chevy nameplate could prove the unlikely rescuer of a troubled Korean brand.

FULL Article Here: http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/04_48/b3910071.htm

Image
 
#2 ·
GM did well in buying Daewoo. Ford was asleep at the wheel when they had the first shot at it. Small inexpensive car production isn't feasible in North America and Daewoo with GMs help is becoming a player and helping GM boost market share around the world.
 
#4 ·
Why must we continue to promote the fraud division of GM? Thousands of loyal American Daewoo owners are left with worthless cars with no factory help by GM who has screwed them. We should be rebuking GM for their dissing of their American Daewoo owners.
 
#5 ·
I hope GM does better with Daewoo the second time around. Remember, they owned this company in the early 1990's and, after it started doing poorly, sold its stake for a mere $90 million. Remember, GM bought back its now slightly-greater-than-40% ownership back for centimillions of dollars more recently. Admittedly, they seem to be leveraging GMDAT's resources much better this time.
 
#6 ·
laserwizard said:
Why must we continue to promote the fraud division of GM? Thousands of loyal American Daewoo owners are left with worthless cars with no factory help by GM who has screwed them. We should be rebuking GM for their dissing of their American Daewoo owners.
Let's see, how shall I light you up this time?

How about this: GM purchased Daewoo long after that company had abandoned the US market. GM's purchase of Daewoo did not include any US assets or operations, so they were not obligated to support any of those products. And quite frankly, assuming any US product liability would have been foolish since it would have made this deal a sure-fire money loser. Besides, with all of GM's current financial headaches, the last thing they needed to do was to be responsible for a bunch of poorly constructed cars. Had GM done this, you'd be the first one criticizing them for making a bad deal, so your gripe, as usual, is irrelevant.

Of course, up until the mid-90's, Ford had a nasty reputation for denying warranty on vehicles with major problems because they would always claim that the customer either abused or didn't maintenance the vehicle. In my opinion, that's an even more egregious offense when you consider the qulaity of vehicle Ford was producing at that time. Of course, in your eyes, LW, Ford never built one wrong, so I'm probably wasting my time.

As usual, you're just talking out of your a$$.
 
#8 ·
I sat in the new Optra wagon yesterday, I thought it was great. Makes me think twice about spending $7000 more for a Malibu Maxx.
The engines need to be re-engineered though, unless GM can find a way to put an ecotech in there. The Optra has 2 fewer cylinders, 81 fewer horses, yet still uses more gas than the 3.5 in the malibu.
 
#10 ·
prod said:
I sat in the new Optra wagon yesterday, I thought it was great. Makes me think twice about spending $7000 more for a Malibu Maxx.
The engines need to be re-engineered though, unless GM can find a way to put an ecotech in there. The Optra has 2 fewer cylinders, 81 fewer horses, yet still uses more gas than the 3.5 in the malibu.
Maybe the Chinese plant that makes 60 degree OHV V6s (e.g. for Chinese use and Equinoxes) could send some to Korea...
 
#11 ·
I will never change my opinion,GM DAT may be running well,but making Chevrolet brand inferior to Opel was the worse move made by GM in years.Same cars ,different continents and different names.Who came up with such stupid idea?
Suzuki was already popular in Europe and had many dealerships.It doesn't make sense to build new dealerships,run a new campaign to popularise Chevrolet brand if there is Suzuki on the market.
There was even a talk-show on tv and the guests (an automotive journalist and a rally driver)were talking about cars.They were asked if they had liked cars in pictures.There was a Chevrolet Lacetti in one of the pictures.They both agreed that although it wasn't a bad car it didn't deserve Chevrolet name.
 
#12 ·
laserwizard said:
Why must we continue to promote the fraud division of GM? Thousands of loyal American Daewoo owners are left with worthless cars with no factory help by GM who has screwed them. We should be rebuking GM for their dissing of their American Daewoo owners.
Bwhahahaha. What, you mean all 6 people in the US who bought a Daewoo? Sheesh. Even out here in California, I think I can count on one hand the number of pre-GM Daewoo cars I've seen on the road.

Those who did buy them probably did so at a deep discount, which made the cars worthless more than anything. Furthermore, if Daewoo's automotive division had simply gone under, how much more "factory help" do you think that these owners would have received?
 
#14 ·
Great news for the GM Asia line.

Hopefully this will lead to more cheap, durable and efficient cars in the North American division:

I think GM made a smart move when they let the Daewoo handle the lower end spectrum of the car market (Aveo) and focused on the higher end with the Cobalt.
 
#15 ·
I don't have faith in the UAW to produce durable, and long-term reliable cars that are newly designed and CHEAP without huge rebates. If I had to get a cheap car, I'd get a Korean one. But there's the whole cheap new vs. cheap used debate to consider.

GM makes good mid range to expensive cars in the US - this Daewoo thing should work.