Joined
·
6,305 Posts
......vs Corvette!!
Although I doubt the Corvette would ever feature AWD due to the difficulty of packaging a front differential and an engine under that extremely low hood combined with the undesirable rise in price and girth, it is possible. The GT-R uses a rear transaxle with front engine like the Corvette. The Nissan has a second drive shaft that runs parallel to the first, returning power up to the front again.I completely agree about the seats comment.
Does anyone know if the vette will ever get AWD? I dont think it can due to its front engine rear mounted tranny configuration, correct?
Or you can look at it as a way to capitalize on development costs for the ZR1, which will never pay for itself in sales. It is such a limited production car, and so much effort has been put into every aspect of its development, that it will always command a high price, even used. The Z06 and ZR1 use an aluminum frame, so it would essentially be impossible to "build your own ZR1" out of a base Vette without reaching near XLR levels of weight. The Z06 would be a lot closer, but it lacks the carbon fiber bodywork of the ZR1 and the huge carbon-ceramic brake package in addition to an extra 133 hp and 134 lb ft of factory warranted, emissions-legal torque. You could probably build something similar, but in the end, I doubt you'd save enough of the $30K difference to make it worth your while.You have to look at this from a business sense. Why would they offer the ZR1 suspension in two other models that cost around $74,755 (Z06) and $50,000 (Z51) and then expect people to continue to pay $30,000 for only 100 extra horsepower or $50,000 for 200 extra horsepower; Something people could easily do themselves for much cheaper, especially with the Z06 by buying an aftermarket supercharger.
You can't modify a suspension as easily as adding a supercharger and modifying the engine output.
Giving all vettes the same suspension would make the ZR1 useless. It would make the ZR1 a little better then a trim upgrade. In other words: Not worth the money.
Your argument seems counter-intuitive. Assuming GM has a larger profit margin on the ZR1 than the Z06 and that the Z06 margin is larger than the base car, and that GM continues to sell every corvette that they can make => Any move that increases the appeal of the base car with respect to the other two actually lowers their revenue and profit for the plant.Or you can look at it as a way to capitalize on development costs for the ZR1, which will never pay for itself in sales. It is such a limited production car, and so much effort has been put into every aspect of its development, that it will always command a high price, even used. The Z06 and ZR1 use an aluminum frame, so it would essentially be impossible to "build your own ZR1" out of a base Vette without reaching near XLR levels of weight. The Z06 would be a lot closer, but it lacks the carbon fiber bodywork of the ZR1 and the huge carbon-ceramic brake package in addition to an extra 133 hp and 134 lb ft of factory warranted, emissions-legal torque. You could probably build something similar, but in the end, I doubt you'd save enough of the $30K difference to make it worth your while.
GM will sell every ZR1 it builds, I have no question in my mind. Why not make some money off of its development by offering the best Vette suspension calibration as an optional upgrade to the other two Vettes? No need to dumb down the base models to upsell to the ZR1 which people will buy anyway. The Vette was always about offering the best to just-within-the-means-of-the-working-man-incomes with few compromises. Now it's available as the most expensive car GM sells, and it would be a low cost, wise decision to let the knowledge gleaned from the ZR1's development trickle down to other models. For example, the greatness that is the CTS-V would never be possible without the ZR1, and even though it costs considerably less, it will probably make more money than it will lose in potential ZR1 sales.