Tahoe LT, that is because I lowered the bumper and fender to give it a more lowered appearence. The length and height ought to be still pretty close to the old Tracker.
well as I said on your other chop, I can't even tell what brand of model this is supposed to be.
You've got your proportions and drawing down great but you need to crank up the details.. headlights, grills, wheels, etc to make it look like the brand you are going for. This car looks like it could be any make right now from the early 90s. Besides the words "TRACKER" on the side, nothing tells me right away this is a Chevy.
well as I said on your other chop, I can't even tell what brand of model this is supposed to be.
You've got your proportions and drawing down great but you need to crank up the details.. headlights, grills, wheels, etc to make it look like the brand you are going for. This car looks like it could be any make right now from the early 90s. Besides the words "TRACKER" on the side, nothing tells me right away this is a Chevy.
It looks like a Euro-subcompact that is too tall riding on trailer tires.
Whenever I'm doing photoshops of cars, I always, ALWAYS, use big tires. I'm not talking 30" DUBS, but I use a wheel that is in proportion to the size of the car.
You want to fill out the wheel wells, to give it that aggressive stance, and a filled out look. Why do you think that all concept cars have bigger wheels than their production counterparts. Its all about the look. You don't want to see tiny wheels on a design sketch.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
GM Inside News Forum
3.5M posts
83.8K members
Since 2003
A forum community dedicated to GM owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about General Motors news, concepts, releases, classifieds, troubleshooting, maintenance, and more!