All This talk of the XT5 being a Acura and Lexus fighter......Isn't that what Buick is supposed to be doing while Cadillac takes on the big boys?.
All This talk of the XT5 being a Acura and Lexus fighter......Isn't that what Buick is supposed to be doing while Cadillac takes on the big boys?.So far, I approve. I hope Cadillac has learned their lesson with pricing. If they are going to get current SRX buyers back and get RX owners to take notice, they are going to have to avoid the price shock they pulled with the CTS.
Personally, a two row CUV like this is too small to be of serious consideration for me, but it does leave me hopeful for what a three row XT6/7 will bring to the table. The MDX can use the competition.
:lmao: NOAre we sure these pics aren't from a Caddy dealer lot?
I mean, people are just walking by and not even noticing it!!
![]()
It doesnt need anything in the front! It looks great!It needs a chromed lower intake. The grille is just too high and heavy looking.
Well... You're not wrong.All This talk of the XT5 being a Acura and Lexus fighter......Isn't that what Buick is supposed to be doing while Cadillac takes on the big boys?.
The SRX/XT5 platform is just as competent as the FWD Benz platform and most likely better... and U know it.Well... You're not wrong.
Ultimately, the problem is Cadillac doesn't have a platform that a "proper" and "competitive" CUV can rid on. And if it does, they're not using it effectively.
So, Cadillac has to create a positive spin on it. So, they do the only thing they can do -- fly one in by helicopter into Manhattan.
Platinum vs. Non-Platinum I think.Has anyone noticed the difference in grilles?
I like the grille in the official photo shoot model better. I hope the more recent pictures aren't some dumb, last minute change.
No ambient lighting?Dark interior Shot
![]()
That cut over the central dash makes it look symmetrical, so maybe there is a wrap covering any ambient lighting that may be there.Platinum vs. Non-Platinum I think.
No ambient lighting?
With all due respect, I think that's doubtful. Obviously we know little about the new platform, but it's probably similar in concept to the current one, as most new platforms are to their predecessor. The Grand Cherokee-M-GL platform is plenty capable off-road while being refined on road, and as a basis allows for very powerful engine options. The SRX's mainstream roots (hybrid platform or otherwise) means you can't put a 550 horsepower V-8 in it, and with items like the chin it's no rival off-road either, even ignoring MB's available off-road package or extra off-roading options on the Jeep. And I'm not being anti-Cadillac here. The Lexus RX and Acura MDX have the same problem. Their basic platform, transmissions, and so on are all adapted from more humble vehicles and therefore do not support what it takes to offer a full line that can compete with the more prominent and expensive German rivals. Off-roading isn't a requirement here, but I'm just mentioning the merits of that specific platform. While it's entirely possible that the new XT5 or MKX or RX are modified sufficiently to accommodate more powerful and exclusive options that would raise the image and ATPs, at this point I think it's doubtful as none of them have intentions of doing so with these products. They're still entry-luxury products. Which again is totally fine and not a problem, but that doesn't mean it's an equal to some of the better platforms.The SRX/XT5 platform is just as competent as the FWD Benz platform and most likely better.
No respect needed... U don't depend on me for food, shelter, or clothes on your back ...With all due respect, I think that's doubtful. Obviously we know little about the new platform, but it's probably similar in concept to the current one, as most new platforms are to their predecessor. The Grand Cherokee-M-GL platform is plenty capable off-road while being refined on road, and as a basis allows for very powerful engine options. The SRX's mainstream roots (hybrid platform or otherwise) means you can't put a 550 horsepower V-8 in it, and with items like the chin it's no rival off-road either, even ignoring MB's available off-road package or extra off-roading options on the Jeep. And I'm not being anti-Cadillac here. The Lexus RX and Acura MDX have the same problem. Their basic platform, transmissions, and so on are all adapted from more humble vehicles and therefore do not support what it takes to offer a full line that can compete with the more prominent and expensive German rivals. Off-roading isn't a requirement here, but I'm just mentioning the merits of that specific platform. While it's entirely possible that the new XT5 or MKX or RX are modified sufficiently to accommodate more powerful and exclusive options that would raise the image and ATPs, at this point I think it's doubtful as none of them have intentions of doing so with these products. They're still entry-luxury products. Which again is totally fine and not a problem, but that doesn't mean it's an equal to some of the better platforms.
He said Chi is likely just as competent, if not better, than the FWD platform that Benz is using. In that regards, I agree.With all due respect, I think that's doubtful. Obviously we know little about the new platform, but it's probably similar in concept to the current one, as most new platforms are to their predecessor. The Grand Cherokee-M-GL platform is plenty capable off-road while being refined on road, and as a basis allows for very powerful engine options. The SRX's mainstream roots (hybrid platform or otherwise) means you can't put a 550 horsepower V-8 in it, and with items like the chin it's no rival off-road either, even ignoring MB's available off-road package or extra off-roading options on the Jeep. And I'm not being anti-Cadillac here. The Lexus RX and Acura MDX have the same problem. Their basic platform, transmissions, and so on are all adapted from more humble vehicles and therefore do not support what it takes to offer a full line that can compete with the more prominent and expensive German rivals. Off-roading isn't a requirement here, but I'm just mentioning the merits of that specific platform. While it's entirely possible that the new XT5 or MKX or RX are modified sufficiently to accommodate more powerful and exclusive options that would raise the image and ATPs, at this point I think it's doubtful as none of them have intentions of doing so with these products. They're still entry-luxury products. Which again is totally fine and not a problem, but that doesn't mean it's an equal to some of the better platforms.
If you pause the video of the Manhattan flyover @1:04 you can get a glimpse of the dash.I really like the direct front and rear. The front is aggressive and the rear has just a smidge of wings to it. Both modern yet references the past. It looks like the only real issue is the sides, where the stubby hood and FWD proportions limit its sheer style. Not that it'll affect sales of course. The rear also looks wide in that picture.
Really want to see the interior.
New shifter. I don't see a manual shift gate... I remain sad.Dark interior Shot
![]()
No ambient lighting?
I think it's more likely it was disabled or removed to not give away too much of the interior.That cut over the central dash makes it look symmetrical, so maybe there is a wrap covering any ambient lighting that may be there.
Except for the two smaller crossovers coming in the near future.This could be the last FWD crossover Cadillac before the RWD successor comes out in '22-'23.
They start local production soon, which should increase sales a bunch.I hope they have the XT5 on high priority for China, because the market is begging for luxury SUVs.