I know this isn't a "new" news story for us, but it was on the front page / top of the fold in the Detroit News today.
Interesting idea to be sure. I agree that to be seen as luxurious, upscale, and different from GM's other brands, they do need separate showrooms. In small markets where they aren't pushing a whole lot of metal, a small 3 car showroom may make a lot of sense. However, in what the dealer doesn't shell out in materials and taxes for a larger showroom, they'll have to put out in technology and the "dealership" experience. If I go to a luxury store, I want to feel pampered, attended to, and waited on. Whatever they decide to do brick-n-mortar wise, that part of the equation can't fall between the cracks.His idea behind the boutique stores — which has not been pitched to dealers yet — is to encourage some to invest in smaller, standalone showrooms featuring maybe two to five cars instead of Cadillac's entire lineup, de Nysschen said last week during an interview with The Detroit News. That would help bolster the brand and dealer profitability, he said.
That's surprising to me. I would have thought that, if the number of stores carrying the Cadillac banner was 900+, that more than 200 would have been standalone.De Nysschen said many Cadillac dealers have high-quality "benchmark" stores, and he wants to boost the number of big standalone stores from about 200 today to 300. The rest would fall into the boutique stores idea. He said Cadillac would encourage dealers to make investments in their facilities, now that Cadillac has announced plans to invest $12 billion in eight new vehicles by the end of the decade.
Even a cursory understanding of arithmetic would suggest that the dealer network is a bit bloated.The fallacies of "too many dealerships" and "dealerships represent a major problem for the Cadillac brand" just refuse to die.![]()
well, I knew I heard it long before Johan de Nysschen (ca.2011). Typical GM, another old, interesting concept that never finds it's place in reality.I know this isn't a "new" news story for us, but it was on the front page / top of the fold in the Detroit News today.
http://www.autonews.com/article/20111201/BLOG15/312019999/cadillac-develops-new-strategy-in-europe“I almost look at it like a boutique approach, almost like Aston Martin or a Bentley in the U.S. Not huge volume but everywhere the consumer experiences and touches that brand, it is done with the utmost level of class, a very high level of sophistication. That is the same kind of approach that we would look to take in Europe.”
Totally agree. Cadillac's issue isn't the Dealers, it the lack of PRODUCT. Get the product and prices right and the volume will come.The fallacies of "too many dealerships" and "dealerships represent a major problem for the Cadillac brand" just refuse to die.![]()
I agree that the dealer network may be a bit too big. However, Cadillac main problem IMO is Product, Product, Product!!!Even a cursory understanding of arithmetic would suggest that the dealer network is a bit bloated.
IMO they may be able to eventually turn their larger distribution network in to a strength, but it remains a weakness at this point. They need stronger more focused and luxury oriented dealers.
Didn't GM almost sell that amount last year?One takeaway for me....Cadillac would have to sell nearly a million vehicles per year to match the per dealer franchise selling rate of BMW. That is astonishing.
It's not the number of locations, its the product and volume of the product; just yesturday we were digging into ATS coupe sales, all indications, they haven't sold a 1,000 units in 6 month!........................That's surprising to me. I would have thought that, if the number of stores carrying the Cadillac banner was 900+, that more than 200 would have been standalone.
This has to get fixed. IMHO, all Caddy stores should be stand alone so as to create both a mental and physical perception that Cadillac is an elevated brand and different from "old GM". What's more, in having stand alone stores, those customers can be catered to and get the dealership experience they'd expect from a luxury marque. If I were GM, I'd look to many of those small market stores and start setting aside money to buy out those franchises. The article says that if the price was right, many would fold. I'd concentrate on those while also pushing for the boutique-store angle.
Just my opinion, of course.
Totally agree. Cadillac's issue isn't the Dealers, it the lack of PRODUCT. Get the product and prices right and the volume will come.
The ATS is a good product. But there are huge numbers of 2014s on dealer lots as of January 2015. Are the dealers at fault? I don't know. But something is wrong. Because the product is good and the economy in the area is extremely good. So something else needs to be fixed.I agree that the dealer network may be a bit too big. However, Cadillac main problem IMO is Product, Product, Product!!!
So then why is Cadillac in last place? If this was a fallacy, they should be at least in the top three. To say that there isn't a problem is to put one's head in the sand.The fallacies of "too many dealerships" and "dealerships represent a major problem for the Cadillac brand" just refuse to die.![]()
No, they sold 170,750 Cadillacs last year.Didn't GM almost sell that amount last year?
This is another true story.Totally agree. Cadillac's issue isn't the Dealers, it the lack of PRODUCT. Get the product and prices right and the volume will come.