Is that so? How's that bloated FWD XT5 doing?Johan de Nysschen said:
Is that so? How's that bloated FWD XT5 doing?Johan de Nysschen said:The cost and packaging advantages of front-wheel drive are appealing but Cadillac is the challenger brand. We want to build our reputation as a purveyor of high-performance drivers' cars. So it's better that we do it off a rear-wheel-drive architecture.
I know that SUV's are all the craze right now and more profitable, but I would have had the sedan out earlier (personal bias). Though at only 24 to 36 months away for both, I'm sure development is fairly far along and we should start seeing a few road testing sometime within the next year or so.The compact crossover will come first, arriving in early 2017.
About a year later, Cadillac will introduce a compact sedan.
Well, if Ed Welburn keeps making Cadillac surfaces "more sophisticated" as he says, I expect it will look like a jelly bean. Hope not, though.I wonder what it will look like?
I still don't like the idea of the sub-ATS entry being a RWD sedan.Well, if Ed Welburn keeps making Cadillac surfaces "more sophisticated" as he says, I expect it will look like a jelly bean. Hope not, though.
It will probably be a 2+2 sedan around the size of the current ATS.
"Sub-ATS" is a myth.I still don't like the idea of the sub-ATS entry being a RWD sedan.
But that's just me.
*Yawn* I'm sick of the Cadillac story... wake me in 10 years so I can see how they're doing...
It's been torture for Cadillac followers, that's been true since the mid 1980s, perpetually unfulfilled promises of greatness around the corner.Me too. It's like we're stuck in a time loop or something.
FWD XT5 was approved long before him.Is that so? How's that bloated FWD XT5 doing?
It was old 15 years ago.It's been torture for Cadillac followers, that's been true since the mid 1980s, perpetually unfulfilled promises of greatness around the corner.
It does get old.
Seems like maybe they are regretting what they did with the ATS pricing/positioning. Maybe what they needed all along was something between the CLA and Bim 3 that could compete against either one depending on engines and options. Especially if they are talking about basing it on alpha you have to ask if maybe they over-shot the mark with the ATS. It also occurs to me that you could do a comfortable 5 seat SUV off a shorter wheelbase - that 109" is a few inches longer than necessary.