Joined
·
6,305 Posts
I guess that's why all the wanna-be thugs out there love 'em- standard shock bounce! No need to spend the rest of their gubment checks on the real thing.Look at that car bounce on the road!!!
Oh stop it. We all know their willingness to love all. At this point it is about sharing, and viewing the archive.........shoot son.More Motorweek hyperbole!!! Everything they test is the best thing since sliced bread. Most of what they test is boring. Wonder what they said about about the "Cadillac" Cimarron or the Chevy Citation (a car that became MT's Car of the Year--oops)? E.g., take a look at the '91 Park Avenue Ultra test.
So you can make a de Ville ride like an Audi (er truck) by installing higher rate springs? GM was so brilliant back then.
I'll take one.
Sorry, didn't mean to shoot from the hip. I did like the Brougham from that era, though (with the 5.7L). Does this mean I have mgt. potential?Oh stop it. We all know their willingness to love all. At this point it is about sharing, and viewing the archive.........shoot son.
who were you blaming it on??? HahahaSorry, didn't mean to shoot from the hip. I did like the Brougham from that era, though (with the 5.7L). Does this mean I have mgt. potential?
Well, peeling out is indeed the truest of tests!! LOL, my 88 2.8 beretta peeled out tons, it only had 125HPhmm I thought the old 4.9L was supposed to be good. Not much HP but tons of torque being OHV. My buddy Mario drove his one buddy's like '94 Deville with it and he said he peeled out with it pretty well
hell yea it is! :drive:Well, peeling out is indeed the truest of tests!! LOL, my 88 2.8 beretta peeled out tons, it only had 125HP