GM Inside News Forum banner
1 - 18 of 18 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
45,627 Posts
Look at that car bounce on the road!!!
I loved those cars. Quite stylish in its day. And the seats are quite nice.

Those were good cars.
Cadillac had the idea of building a more sporting car back then, but just didn't put all the pieces together until CTS. THough, they did fine with the Gen4 Seville STS.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
270 Posts
More Motorweek hyperbole!!! Everything they test is the best thing since sliced bread. Most of what they test is boring. Wonder what they said about about the "Cadillac" Cimarron or the Chevy Citation (a car that became MT's Car of the Year--oops)? E.g., take a look at the '91 Park Avenue Ultra test.

So you can make a de Ville ride like an Audi (er truck) by installing higher rate springs? GM was so brilliant back then.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
6,305 Posts
Discussion Starter · #5 ·
More Motorweek hyperbole!!! Everything they test is the best thing since sliced bread. Most of what they test is boring. Wonder what they said about about the "Cadillac" Cimarron or the Chevy Citation (a car that became MT's Car of the Year--oops)? E.g., take a look at the '91 Park Avenue Ultra test.

So you can make a de Ville ride like an Audi (er truck) by installing higher rate springs? GM was so brilliant back then.
Oh stop it. We all know their willingness to love all. At this point it is about sharing, and viewing the archive.........shoot son.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
825 Posts
yeah, a real tuna boat back in the day.front wheel drive,heavy,and downright boring.i'm so glad that the 90's are behind us.now hopefully cadillac can finally rid itself of front wheel drive platforms with their new DTS/STS replacement.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,426 Posts
4.9L 200 hp. LOL!!
 

· Registered
Joined
·
6,305 Posts
Discussion Starter · #11 ·
Sorry, didn't mean to shoot from the hip. I did like the Brougham from that era, though (with the 5.7L). Does this mean I have mgt. potential?
who were you blaming it on??? Hahaha
 

· Registered
Joined
·
11,951 Posts
hmm I thought the old 4.9L was supposed to be good. Not much HP but tons of torque being OHV. My buddy Mario drove his one buddy's like '94 Deville with it and he said he peeled out with it pretty well
 

· Registered
Joined
·
6,305 Posts
Discussion Starter · #14 ·
hmm I thought the old 4.9L was supposed to be good. Not much HP but tons of torque being OHV. My buddy Mario drove his one buddy's like '94 Deville with it and he said he peeled out with it pretty well
Well, peeling out is indeed the truest of tests!! LOL, my 88 2.8 beretta peeled out tons, it only had 125HP
 

· Registered
Joined
·
11,951 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
1,345 Posts
I would love to have a an original DTS. The car isn't to bad in the power department. Definitely not quick by today's standards though.
 
1 - 18 of 18 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top