GM Inside News Forum banner
21 - 40 of 57 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
723 Posts
Originally posted by GotAWD+May 27 2004, 02:03 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (GotAWD @ May 27 2004, 02:03 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-chadbarb99@May 27 2004, 12:32 PM
Well, at least there is a 600+ HP Corvette as well, REMEMBER GM's RULE CANNOT HAVE ANY CAR MORE POWERFUL THAN THE CORVETTE!!!  Just build them both GM.  The Cadillac will go head to head againdst the next BMW M5 and the super Vette will take down Viper's and GT'sand hell maybe a few Lambo Murciagolago (can't spell).
i think caddy should be exempted from that rule since there going after BMW and MB. plus its prolly only gonna be this one car if it is built. course why not the XLR and the Blue Devil.

CADDY!!!CADDY!!!CADDY!!!CADDY!!!CADDY!!!CADDY!!!CADDY!!!
:bounce: :bounce: :bounce: [/b][/quote]
You dohave a point, look at DCX, there are AMG MB's more powerful than the Dodge Viper. So I guess it's okay then
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7 Posts
Dude, what is your malfunction?

Listen, that 5 speed that they sold to BMW is IN the CTS, just not the V. THEY ARE DEVELOPING a 6 speed auto that will handle the power. The Tremec T-56 in the CTS-V is one of the best manuals around. Does BMW sell an M5 with an auto? Uh no.

Stop nit picking reasons to dump on caddy when they are coming out with a 600 HP engine.

Also, I would like to point out that when the article came out saying it was the CTS V plus, I said the there must be something we dont know about it because of that hoodscoop, seeing how the LS2 isnt physically bigger than the LS6. I guess there was somethign we dont know.
"Dude what is your malfunction?" (what are we back in high school now?)

My father in law works for the GM Plant in Parma OH.

I am more than willing and able to drop $50K on the CTS-V but the manual is a deal breaker with the wife and not practical as a "family" car.

There are plenty of other cars in this segment that, while they might not have the 400 hp, in the real world they will do just as good a job and are more "family" friendly. The 300C HEMI and the M-B AMG C36 come to mind. Honestly what difference does it make if one car is just a couple of tenths slower to 60MPH? When is anybody EVER going to miss those couple of tenths in the real world? 600 HP....great..it gets every kid in study hall something to lust after.


Hey if you are content with it taking 10 product years for GM's own 5 speed auto to make it into their own cars that is all that really matters.

IMO the CTS-V is a great car but it is missing its target audience. By making it a hot rod (6 speed manual only)it appeals to a younger crowd but how many of them have $50K to drop on a car?

BTW: The NEW M5 will have at least 2 transmission options, manual and a SMG ( the 1st ever non-manual in a M5).

Look GM and Caddy make fine products, I had an Escalade that I got through the PEP program, and can make and engine that is just as good as anybody BUT they are WAY behing the curve on transmissions. BMW and MB are introducing 6 and 7 speed autos and have had 5 speeds for 10 years.

All I am suggesting is that instead of going after headline HP numbers maybe they should spend just a touch more time working on getting their luxo-performance cars technology that is 10 years old and is obviously the wave of the future.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
32 Posts
Originally posted by jgast18@May 27 2004, 07:54 PM
I am more than willing and able to drop $50K on the CTS-V but the manual is a deal breaker with the wife and not practical as a "family" car.
So leave the manuals to us guys that still want/can/order/drive a manual. Bottom line: If you and the fam are going out in the CTSv, are you really going to let your wife drive? Laughable at best.

Yeah its got 4 doors, but make no mistake this is a PERFORMANCE machine, not something to take to go get groceries with the Mrs.
Do you honestly think that the people that buy M3/M5 consider that they need to haul around their family? NO.

If you can afford a CTSv, then go buy the wife a minivan, you can get something else and let the rest of us who like the thought of a 400/500/600 hp car get a CTSv/CTS Super V.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,003 Posts
Originally posted by tgagneguam@May 27 2004, 05:44 PM
Some people appear to be having a little too much fun in Germany...
I just wish I was there with them.... :(
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,094 Posts
Originally posted by R.E Sanchez@May 27 2004, 01:57 PM
:huh: 500, 600, 700 this is really getting old.
These are pretty sick numbers for production cars. Rather than "getting old", it is getting scary. I really don't feel most people (myself included) can handle that much power (don't NASCARs run at 700HP?). Nor are there many places to use that much power. Unless there are professional drivers behind the wheel of these cars, they seem to be just downright dangerous.

With that being said, I hope we see the CTS-V Plus and Corvette with over 600HP. And boy oh boy, do I want one.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7 Posts
Originally posted by discgolf01+May 28 2004, 01:44 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (discgolf01 @ May 28 2004, 01:44 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-jgast18@May 27 2004, 07:54 PM
I am more than willing and able to drop $50K on the CTS-V but the manual is a deal breaker with the wife and not practical as a "family" car.
So leave the manuals to us guys that still want/can/order/drive a manual. Bottom line: If you and the fam are going out in the CTSv, are you really going to let your wife drive? Laughable at best.

Yeah its got 4 doors, but make no mistake this is a PERFORMANCE machine, not something to take to go get groceries with the Mrs.
Do you honestly think that the people that buy M3/M5 consider that they need to haul around their family? NO.

If you can afford a CTSv, then go buy the wife a minivan, you can get something else and let the rest of us who like the thought of a 400/500/600 hp car get a CTSv/CTS Super V. [/b][/quote]
The wife can drive anytime she wants.

The CTS-V is one of those rare best of both worlds cars. Something that has great performance but also can haul a family of 4 and luggage/shopping bags and be used as a year round daily driver. This car is one of the best ideas to come out of GM since the GMC Typhoon ( a SUV that was way ahead of its time). I just think that GM needs to widen its appeal.

Honestly I dont know why they didnt just use the 350HP 'Vett engine instead of the Z06 engine and offer the 2 different transmissions to begin with.

Like I said before the local dealer has had the same 2 CTS-V's sitting on the lot for a full 3 months now and I think part of the reason he hasnt sold the cars is becasue the traditional Cadillac customer isnt looking for a 6 speed manual and the horsepower junkies/younger crowd cant afford a $50K car and even if they had $50K to spend they probably would consider a 4-door last.

It is a great car with a limited market the way it is currently optioned. That is fine for making headlines in all the auto mags by playing horsepower wars but tough when it comes to selling cars.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,973 Posts
:lol:
so are you thinking to let the wife drive a 400hp rwd in winter? this is wrong on several levels!
buy her a slow suv for those "oops I have no ideea what I was doing" moments wich could and will turn real ugly real fast with a 400 or 600 hp monster...
trust me, it's easier to learn how to drive a manual gearbox than to drive such a powerfull piece of machinery!!

this is not like a new 2k digital camera with features you don't need or know how to use, wich you buy to impress your friends: this can blow in your face faster than you can say "oops"!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7 Posts
Originally posted by johnd89@May 28 2004, 03:57 AM
:lol:
so are you thinking to let the wife drive a 400hp rwd in winter? this is wrong on several levels!
buy her a slow suv for those "oops I have no ideea what I was doing" moments wich could and will turn real ugly real fast with a 400 or 600 hp monster...
trust me, it's easier to learn how to drive a manual gearbox than to drive such a powerfull piece of machinery!!

this is not like a new 2k digital camera with features you don't need or know how to use, wich you buy to impress your friends: this can blow in your face faster than you can say "oops"!
I am not going to get into a debate with you, or anybody for that matter, about the driving ability of my wife or females in general.

I guess around here only a "real man" can drive a 400hp car and that car must have a manual tranny.

Snow tires, traction control, and common sense....as in she has enough common sense to take the SUV when it is snowing.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
809 Posts
I've always been under the impression that GM is really far behind in the transmission department. Has anyone every driven a S2000??? One of the best transmissions ever! And that's a major selling point of the car. I think it'd be a very cost-effective decision for GM (mostly Caddy) to develop the 6 and 7 speed autos that their competitors are.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,973 Posts
Originally posted by jgast18@May 28 2004, 04:10 AM
I guess around here only a "real man" can drive a 400hp car and that car must have a manual tranny.

Snow tires, traction control, and common sense....as in she has enough common sense to take the SUV when it is snowing.
some cars, like the m3 only have a manual gearbox... If it would had an automatic they would have probably sold another one or two, that's all...

I'm not discussing their choice of offering only the manual, I'm just saying that you sound like a person who simply dosen't need the cts-v, but a regular cts!

To prove me wrong, just tell me why exactly do you need 400hp in a cts, let alone 600. Also, why the 255hp are insuficient for you?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7 Posts
Originally posted by johnd89@May 28 2004, 05:06 AM

some cars, like the m3 only have a manual gearbox... If it would had an automatic they would have probably sold another one or two, that's all...

I'm not discussing their choice of offering only the manual, I'm just saying that you sound like a person who simply dosen't need the cts-v, but a regular cts!

To prove me wrong, just tell me why exactly do you need 400hp in a cts, let alone 600. Also, why the 255hp are insuficient for you?
The M3 offers the SMG (sequential manual transmission). It is basically a 6 speed with no clutch. It will also be offered on the new M5. M3's havent been manual only since 1995.

Why do you care what my automotive needs/wants are? I have nothing to prove to an absolute stranger on a message board.

Plain and simple: the faster they offer an automatic or semi-automatic transmission in the V Series the faster these cars will catch on in the Luxo-Performance segment.

Then again that is just my OPINION.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,882 Posts
Originally posted by jgast18@May 28 2004, 12:54 AM
Hey if you are content with it taking 10 product years for GM's own 5 speed auto to make it into their own cars that is all that really matters.

IMO  the CTS-V is a great car but it is missing its target audience.  By making it a hot rod (6 speed manual only)it appeals to a younger crowd but how many of them have $50K to drop on a car?

BTW:  The NEW M5 will have at least 2 transmission options, manual and a SMG ( the 1st ever non-manual in a M5). 

Look GM and Caddy make fine products, I had an Escalade that I got through the PEP program,  and can make and engine that is just as good as anybody BUT they are WAY behing the curve on transmissions.  BMW and MB are introducing 6 and 7 speed autos and have had 5 speeds for 10 years. 

All I am suggesting is that instead of going after headline HP numbers maybe they should spend just a touch more time working on getting their luxo-performance cars technology that is 10 years old and is obviously the wave of the future.
These 5-speed automatics that GM started building 10 years ago for the European market weren't really sized for anything GM had here. The only rear-drive cars GM had put out too much torque for them. The broader the torque curve of an engine, the less you really need more ratios in your transmission. With smaller engines in Europe, they needed them first.

With every rear-drive Cadillac that's introduced (except the Escalade), the 5-speed automatic is included, and the 6-speed will be there for 2006.

BMW has had no automatic in the M5 for years. Have they been wrong the whole time? The M cars, like the V-series Cadillacs, are not meant to be family grocery getters. They are dedicated "hot rods" that happen to have 4-doors, and aren't meant to be for everyone.

The new M5 will have a sequential manual gearbox as you've said for 2005, and the CTS-V will have an automatic a year after that. I know, I know, "GM is behind again, etc." But keep in mind, a couple of years ago they had absolutely nothing like this car. Rome wasn't built in a day. Would it be possible for anyone (not just you) to be happy with the incredible progress that's been made recently?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
106 Posts
The s2000 tranny is in the Solstice.

Thank god for the CTS-V only having a manual. Otherwise I'd never be able to find a non-auto available. At the current production numbers, GM should be able to handily sell all the 6-speed Vs and that is all that matters. Allowing only a manual will only HELP cadillac's image. The more soccer moms and grandpas that drive this car the more people will think nothing has changed at Cadillac.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,882 Posts
Originally posted by me3head@May 28 2004, 02:29 PM
The s2000 tranny is in the Solstice.

Thank god for the CTS-V only having a manual. Otherwise I'd never be able to find a non-auto available. At the current production numbers, GM should be able to handily sell all the 6-speed Vs and that is all that matters. Allowing only a manual will only HELP cadillac's image. The more soccer moms and grandpas that drive this car the more people will think nothing has changed at Cadillac.
Gee, I suppose you don't want to see a padded, simulated convertible roof on a CTS-V either then. :p
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7 Posts
Originally posted by MelvinJ+May 28 2004, 01:21 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (MelvinJ @ May 28 2004, 01:21 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> vin<!--QuoteBegin-jgast18@May 28 2004, 12:54 AM
Hey if you are content with it taking 10 product years for GM's own 5 speed auto to make it into their own cars that is all that really matters.

IMO  the CTS-V is a great car but it is missing its target audience.  By making it a hot rod (6 speed manual only)it appeals to a younger crowd but how many of them have $50K to drop on a car?

BTW:  The NEW M5 will have at least 2 transmission options, manual and a SMG ( the 1st ever non-manual in a M5). 

Look GM and Caddy make fine products, I had an Escalade that I got through the PEP program,  and can make and engine that is just as good as anybody BUT they are WAY behing the curve on transmissions.  BMW and MB are introducing 6 and 7 speed autos and have had 5 speeds for 10 years. 

All I am suggesting is that instead of going after headline HP numbers maybe they should spend just a touch more time working on getting their luxo-performance cars technology that is 10 years old and is obviously the wave of the future.
These 5-speed automatics that GM started building 10 years ago for the European market weren't really sized for anything GM had here. The only rear-drive cars GM had put out too much torque for them. The broader the torque curve of an engine, the less you really need more ratios in your transmission. With smaller engines in Europe, they needed them first.

With every rear-drive Cadillac that's introduced (except the Escalade), the 5-speed automatic is included, and the 6-speed will be there for 2006.

BMW has had no automatic in the M5 for years. Have they been wrong the whole time? The M cars, like the V-series Cadillacs, are not meant to be family grocery getters. They are dedicated "hot rods" that happen to have 4-doors, and aren't meant to be for everyone.

The new M5 will have a sequential manual gearbox as you've said for 2005, and the CTS-V will have an automatic a year after that. I know, I know, "GM is behind again, etc." But keep in mind, a couple of years ago they had absolutely nothing like this car. Rome wasn't built in a day. Would it be possible for anyone (not just you) to be happy with the incredible progress that's been made recently? [/b][/quote]
MelvinJ

I AGREE 100%. GREAT progress has been made.

It is like trying to stop or turn the Titanic....it takes time. I just want it YESTERDAY.

That alone speeks voulmes about the progress that has been made....GM making cars people cant wait for. :D
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,973 Posts
Originally posted by jgast18@May 28 2004, 12:48 PM
Why do you care what my automotive needs/wants are? I have nothing to prove to an absolute stranger on a message board.

Plain and simple: the faster they offer an automatic or semi-automatic transmission in the V Series the faster these cars will catch on in the Luxo-Performance segment.

Then again that is just my OPINION.
Well, here you're wrong: I'm not an absolute stranger, we both like to discuss gm cars, that's why we're here in the first place!
You can ask me what are my needs, I'm ok with that...
As for "catching up", well, it seems that others should try and catch the cts-v: this thing is a monster as it is, let alone further improvements (600 or whatever hp). ;)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
76 Posts
I dunno guys!!! This Super V may just be an engine test for another car using the CTS body work as camouflage. The engine must be the "new" 7.0 V8 that is to debut in the Corvette. My guess is that 600 hp would be too much GM and the CTS. But I'm holding out for an 06' 600 hp, 427 cu in. Corvette Stingray.
 
21 - 40 of 57 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top