Read more about the 2016 Chevrolet Malibu Review at AutoGuide.com.The modern day Chevrolet Malibu hasn’t had an easy life.
Reintroduced as a nameplate in 1997, the Malibu was adorned with the unenvious task of battling family sedan heavyweights like the Toyota Camry and Honda Accord. But try as it may, the Malibu always fell a bit short. With each new generation, the Malibu would improve, but so would the competition. In a proverbial game of cat and mouse, the cat never could quite catch those pesky mice.
Chevrolet now has another opportunity to turn the Malibu into a prime-time player. Rebuilt from the ground up, the new car is officially the ninth-generation Malibu, but really the fifth-generation model since the Malibu’s front-wheel drive rebirth nearly 20 years ago
If it can reach the Fusion's volumes with a low percentage of fleet sales it'll be a considered a success.This car appears to stack-up very well and even exceed the Ford Fusion; too bad it wasn't on the market 3 years ago
Except it's now the most technological advanced car in the class along with the most available passive safety features as well.This car appears to stack-up very well and even exceed the Ford Fusion; too bad it wasn't on the market 3 years ago...........
In 2008 the Malibu had a huge leap forward, and was a competent car in the segment, in 2012 the same basic car had fallen way behind, then the 2013 Malibu came out, despite improvements, barely adequate, at least 2 or 3 years late; behind the competition.
Now fast-forward to 2016, and we have another "catch-up" car................
The Fusion's volume is not with a LOW PERCENTAGE of Fleet Sales tho. Fusion and Malibu normally run about the same in FleetIf it can reach the Fusion's volumes with a low percentage of fleet sales it'll be a considered a success.
I am right there with you! Malibu is a great car both in pictures and in person!About the Malibu though it is as competitive a vehicle out there....period and I like it....so now you can pick on me
Me either, which is why I said it did...................I'm not clear where the new Malibu doesn't stack up well, other than a few stats that most in this segment don't care about (0-60) and a piece of plastic on the bottom of the door that the author of the article thinks will get scuffed. This is a segment of reputations, comfort, size, but not necessarily breakthroughs. I can't remember ever seeing a real breakthrough in this segment, except maybe the 1980's jellybean Taurus. GM finally got the size right, sounds like they got the comfort right, they got the style right. Now GM needs to make sure the quality is there to build up the reputation, so maybe in 10+ years they can think about Camry sales volumes.
Unrelated - does GM need to be more consistent with future generations of the Malibu? Other than sheet metal, the Camry and Accord have consistently sent out the same signals over the past 30 years, where the Lumina/Malibu keep going from basic transportation to luxury oriented (2008 model), to Camaro-ish, etc.? GM seems to want the Malibu to come out of the gate with Camry level sales volume, if they don't they change the direction for the next gen, I think they need to say consistent so "brand Malibu" says something.
This car appears to stack-up very well and even exceed the Ford Fusion; too bad it wasn't on the market 3 years ago..............
OK, so when I say "appears to stack-up very well" and "even exceed the Ford Fusion" we agree?Except it's now the most technological advanced car in the class along with the most available passive safety features as well.
The Fusion's volume is not with a LOW PERCENTAGE of Fleet Sales tho. Fusion and Malibu normally run about the same in Fleet
Poncho: that interior looks like very nice seats dropped into the grey interior of a Cobalt. The seats make the grey plastic look even more low rent than it would with neutral trim or a beige contrasting color. The two colors are not in harmony with each other. The seats look very high quality. The grey plastic looks like it comes straight from a Spark.Who in the heck approved that interior color combination? At nearly 32 large there should be no excuse for any interior quality cheapness. The top Premier trim should have 18" tires std with 19" optional. There is no reason to have such massive tires on a non sport sedan with FWD.
Additionally, that is not the ONLY color combo offered. Nevertheless, I guarantee there are some out there who actually likes this.Poncho: that interior looks like very nice seats dropped into the grey interior of a Cobalt. The seats make the grey plastic look even more low rent than it would with neutral trim or a beige contrasting color. The two colors are not in harmony with each other. The seats look very high quality. The grey plastic looks like it comes straight from a Spark.
Sounds like a GM Vs Ford comparison in terms of Retail vs Total. Loves me some GMYup, and the Malibu is at 182K and the Fusion is at 275K YTD...................... meaning Fusion sells more retail than Malibu does in total.
Try this: look at REAL interior out in REAL world instead of just seeing pictures and thinking that represents realty.Poncho: that interior looks like very nice seats dropped into the grey interior of a Cobalt. The seats make the grey plastic look even more low rent than it would with neutral trim or a beige contrasting color. The two colors are not in harmony with each other. The seats look very high quality. The grey plastic looks like it comes straight from a Spark.
I know that.The Fusion's volume is not with a LOW PERCENTAGE of Fleet Sales tho. Fusion and Malibu normally run about the same in Fleet
While not a show stopper I wished the lower door plastic wasn't so scratch
Remember the 60's and 70's when all doors has carpet scuff protection on the lower panels? May be retro, but works better than plastic.
Real fog light are a must if you have to drive during a snowstorm.All of this.
And I'd rather have LED DRLs than fogs any day. Pretty sure the only time I've touched the fog lamp button in the Envoy is when taking pictures with the lights on.
Makes sense.While not a show stopper I wished the lower door plastic wasn't so scratch
Remember the 60's and 70's when all doors has carpet scuff protection on the lower panels? May be retro, but works better than plastic.
It is saddle and light grey, the colors aren't even integrated to compliment each other, it is just chunks of saddle placed in and on a sea of grey interior, the flippin' seat-belts aren't even the same color as the seats!? Is this a Work Truck?Try this: look at REAL interior out in REAL world instead of just seeing pictures and thinking that represents realty.
Your opinion. Looks great to meIt is saddle and light grey, the colors aren't even integrated to compliment each other, it is just chunks of saddle placed in and on a sea of grey interior, the flippin' seat-belts aren't even the same color as the seats!? Is this a Work Truck?
It is my opinion that this is a terrible execution, with regard to color combinations and aesthetically pleasing to the eye; I'm fine with grey, I'm fine with saddle, I'm fine with contrast, but to me this is "Green House, Purple Shutters" territory.
I'm a fan of beige interiors too, but up North, those beige carpets get stained and junky looking, especially in the winter.
Cocoa/beige Chevy interiors are usually very well executed.![]()
Here's the brown and tan interior of our Cruze. It looks nice.
If the colors were inverted (tan interior with brown seats) it would also look nice.