GM Inside News Forum banner
1 - 20 of 67 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
594 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 · (Edited)

· Registered
Joined
·
5,569 Posts
Re: 2009 Cadillac CTS-V to Make 567 HP!!!

I like these random HP numbers....550 and 620 are so...err...rounded and boring.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,089 Posts
Re: 2009 Cadillac CTS-V to Make 567 HP!!!

That's weak! That's not enough Hp! How is thie car ever going to compete!



:rolleyes:j/k powervette

That's a good helping. Will this compete with MB E65 AMG, BMW M5?
Or will it go head to head with the M3, C65 AMG, IS-F, etc?

Not to mention the car is hot lookin'!
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,736 Posts
Re: 2009 Cadillac CTS-V to Make 567 HP!!!

That's a good helping. Will this compete with MB E65 AMG, BMW M5?
Or will it go head to head with the M3, C65 AMG, IS-F, etc?
It's size puts it in the class of the BMW M5, M-B E65AMG, and Audi S6.

However, most reviewers will put it up against the M3/C65. Heck, if they compare the CTS to the 3-series and the C-class, what will they put the upcoming BTS against? BMW's 1-series? I mean, come on! :cool:
 

· Registered
Joined
·
15 Posts
Re: 2009 Cadillac CTS-V to Make 567 HP!!!

That's weak! That's not enough Hp! How is thie car ever going to compete!



:rolleyes:j/k powervette

That's a good helping. Will this compete with MB E65 AMG, BMW M5?
Or will it go head to head with the M3, C65 AMG, IS-F, etc?

Not to mention the car is hot lookin'![/qu i think the hp is going to be enoung. beside you can get a 6 speed maul or auto in the ctsv
 

· Registered
Joined
·
4,823 Posts
Thats ridiculous. This truly will be the fastest Sedan on the market.
 

· Registered
2015 Cadillac XTS Platinum, 2014 Cadillac Saks 5th Ave ELR, 1989 Merkur XR4Ti, 1989 Merkur Scorpio
Joined
·
12,289 Posts
Re: 2009 Cadillac CTS-V to Make 567 HP!!!

:clap:
Still... that's a very solid number...
It can't be any good... it doesn't have quad cams.
Everyone knows you need DOHC to compete in this segment.
 
1 - 20 of 67 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top