GM Inside News Forum banner

1 - 8 of 8 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
46 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·


2005 Chevrolet Uplander

GM reskins '05 minivans with more sport, utility

To boost sales, driver self-esteem, automaker adds loads of style, features to van models.

By Ed Garsten / The Detroit News


DETROIT — Take a traditional minivan, give its big nose some rhinoplasty, its body styling a dose of testosterone and pop in an entertainment system that can download and play back audio and video files, and you have what General Motors Corp. believes will be a family ferry that will erase the stigma of beleaguered soccer moms.

The all-new 2005 Chevrolet Uplander and Pontiac Montana SV6 that will be introduced Wednesday at the Chicago Auto Show are being called crossover sport vans, rather than the culturally branded minivan.

With the phaseout this year of Oldsmobile, which markets the Silhouette minivan, GM hopes to rebuild minivan sales by also offering versions of the new sport vans under its Buick and Saturn brands for the first time. The Buick Terraza, Saturn Relay, Uplander and Montana will go on sale this fall.

They all have the requisite sliding doors of a minivan, seating for seven and plenty of storage space and cupholders, but carry the styling — especially in the front end — of popular sport utility vehicles.

Rather than sloping hoods and vast windshields, GM’s crossover sport vans will carry more vertical hood lines and raised headlamps. They will ride on 17-inch wheels to give them a more SUV-like look. SUV attributes such as all-wheel drive will be available along with modest towing capabilities — about 3,500 pounds.

Aside from the styling and requisite second and third-row seats that fold flat — but not flush with the floor — GM is counting on an optional entertainment feature called PhatNoise as a major selling point for shoppers teetering between a minivan and an SUV.

PhatNoise is a wallet-size 40 gigabyte removable hard drive. It can hold up to 10,000 songs, up to 40 movies or any combination of audio or video files. Since it’s removable, the hard drive can be connected to a home computer or laptop to download files for playback.

It’s the first application of PhatNoise in a GM product. Pricing on the vans and PhatNoise have not yet been set.

Jim Vurpillat, Pontiac Montana SV6 marketing director, says the vehicle will be aimed at bolstering the self-esteem of new moms who are reluctant to admit they need what he calls their first “lifestyle vehicle” — a euphemism for kids and all their stuff.

“We’re going after the younger female, as opposed to both Mom and Dad,” said Vurpillat. “We’ll try to speak to Mom, not forgetting she’s a mom but a woman who has other needs. Those people have a little bit of reluctance (in considering a minivan).”

AutoPacific analyst Jim Hall believes a minivan in an SUV’s clothing may not fool anyone.

“It’s going to be a challenge for them to pull it off,” said Hall. “Ultimately, the customer is going to decide whether they’re crossover vans or vans with long noses.”

Never a leader in minivan sales, GM has seen its share of the market segment dwindle in recent years. GM’s slice of the shrinking U.S. minivan market slipped to 18.6 percent in 2003, down from 20.2 percent in 2002, hurt by its aging minivan lineup, domestic competition and the success of the Honda Odyssey and Toyota Sienna.

The minivan was first introduced in 1984 by DaimlerChrysler AG’s Chrysler Group. The Dodge Caravan, Chrysler Voyager and later, the Chrysler Town and Country, quickly caught on as a more fun and functional substitute for the traditional family hauler — the station wagon and rear-wheel drive full-size vans.

Other automakers jumped on the bandwagon and soon the public had plenty of minivan choices.

Favored by “soccer moms” who ferryed kids from activity to activity, minivans began to lose ground to SUVs in the late 1990s, when beleaguered parents took issue with the connotation they had no lives of their own.

GM’s original minivans were nicknamed the “dustbuster vans.” They were hung with that derisive moniker because their slope-nosed front ends bore a strong similarity to the hand-held Dustbuster vacuums sold by Black & Decker.

In recent years, the severely shaped minivans were replaced by more traditional-looking models, most notably the Chevy Venture and the outgoing Pontiac Montana.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Wow. GM's biggest dissapointment ever. It gives me a warm feeling. Right in the pit of my stomach. :angry: :( <_< :unsure:
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
14,963 Posts
jesus, you guys act like the hope of all that is GM rides on a mini van? Other then the stow-away seating which they lack, the van isn really that bad. It looks like an SUV and I think that will play twards it advantage. People dont want to be caught in a mini van, but if it looks like a SUV with the room of a mini van then thats cool. Mini van people arent all that too picky. They dont say "well hunny, this van doesnt have a quad turbo v12, we should go look at another one..." I mean they want good quality car for a good price. If they have a mini van, most chances they have 3 or more kids and all about teh same age. Entertainment value, feel, cargo space and quiet is what the Van needs to be. Not some rip snorting, super van you guys seem to want? I dont understand what the disapontment is? It looks like the rest of them, yeah... but look at dodge and chryster... they are the best selling mini vans year after year after year and there vans have been the same exact thing since the begining. Maybe Pontiac should add some plastic sidding to theres so that its different? :rolleyes: Its a mini van for christ sakes, not a halo car.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,231 Posts
Originally posted by bigals87z28@Feb 2 2004, 12:22 AM
Its a mini van for christ sakes, not a halo car.
I agree--- and the vans do fine for what they are. When comparing them to other popular minivans, they're really not that bad. They look pretty good, and have sufficient cool features. The seat doesn't need to fold into a well-- just fold flat. When the fold-flat into well seats came out, people weren't impressed with the well- they were impressed with the fact that they didn't have to remove the seats, yet they were out of the way. These seats serve the same purpose--- AND- they can be removed as well, right?
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
3,704 Posts
I'm just glad to see the level heads starting to prevail. The official pics are now readily available, and so I ran them by the staff this morning, and here were the only comments:

1. (every staffer) "Hey, it looks kine a like an SUV!"
2. (most staffers) "That interior looks great!"
3. (a few staffers) "Finally, something besides the Venture."

That about sums it up. As in the Malibu vs. the V/6 automatic competition, the performance difference will not be noticeable.

Ghrankenstein
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
194 Posts
Mabye the front end might look like an SUV, but the least they could have done is redesign the rear end to match. It looks awful, it's not too bad, but the rear end is just such an obvious carry-over. No excuse some new windows and fresh sheetmetal would have fixed this. Also they have way to many versions of this vehicle.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,231 Posts
Originally posted by Canadian Camaro SS@Feb 5 2004, 05:21 PM
Also they have way to many versions of this vehicle.
How so?-- they're trying to appeal to different tastes, keep all the dealers happy, and keep the plants working. I see little problem with it.
 
1 - 8 of 8 Posts
Top