GM Inside News Forum banner
21 - 40 of 141 Posts
Current Altima Specs:

Wheelbase ... 109.3
Overall length ... 190.7
Overall width ... 70.7
Overall height ... 58.0
Track width (f/r) ... 61.0/61.0

Relative to the outgoing Altima, the wheelbase is unchanged but the rear track is widened slightly, the car is 0.8 inch longer, and 1.3 inches wider. Extensive use of ultra-high-strength steel means the body structure -- already among the featheriest in the segment – weighs in 79 pounds lighter (roughly 3100-3200 pounds depending on configuration) and is 30-percent more rigid. We're also told to expect best-in-class acceleration, and handling
Motortrend

This is what I find interesting: Nissan, Toyota, Honda, H&K twins, VW and Ford don’t have the weight of GM mid-size vehicles. All the mid-size from these manufacturers are at or under 3400lbs for I4 powertrains. Additionally, the Japanese triumvirate still offer powerful but efficient V6s… are you listening GM, especially with Regal.
 
Current Altima Specs:

Wheelbase ... 109.3
Overall length ... 190.7
Overall width ... 70.7
Overall height ... 58.0
Track width (f/r) ... 61.0/61.0



Motortrend

This is what I find interesting: Nissan, Toyota, Honda, H&K twins, VW and Ford don’t have the weight of GM mid-size vehicles. All the mid-size from these manufacturers are at or under 3400lbs for I4 powertrains. Additionally, the Japanese triumvirate still offer powerful but efficient V6s… are you listening GM, especially with Regal.
My Altima weights in around 3050lbs but it also is lacking in sound insulation. While it isn't as loud as my friends Impreza, my car has bad wind, road, and engine noise (the last I like, but the others I don't). I think the interior is a good improvement, looks like it will have better quality materials.

I expect the Malibu will be less sporty but will be a more refined driving experience compared to the Altima. GM's latest offering are very quiet and smooth.
 
The interior looks pretty plain and, aside from the LCDs, wouldn't seem out of place in a mid-90's car. Other than that, this looks like a decent package.

Personally, I still prefer the interior and exterior of the Fusion better (not that it really matters -- I'm not shopping in this class).
 
It is often said that the mid size mass market sedan class is the most competitive on planet earth, and now we see why. If Nissan is able to truly see 38 mpg highway with its standard 4 cylinder non Eco/ Eassist model its place as # 2 in this class is cemented in stone.
Maybe #3 then, the Fusion is estimated by Ford to get 26city/37hwy with the 1.6LEcoboost. I would rather have a real transmission then the rubber band CVT.
 
obviously very conservative....perhaps it goes as far as it needs to, to stay universal and appeal to differing demographics....the interior is rather drab. the side profile is so much more unified with the rest of the car than before, that's great. a lot of elegance in this, but it's nothing that others aren't doing as well....
 
I know it is very easy to lambast the Malibu, but we must remember that the Malibu has a high mileage variant. The competition has been left truly exposed if this car in its base format can achieve 38 miles per gallon with a $21,500 entry price.
 
Maybe #3 then, the Fusion is estimated by Ford to get 26city/37hwy with the 1.6LEcoboost. I would rather have a real transmission then the rubber band CVT.
The Atima as of this month broke 40,000 units and that is with the old car and only 3,000 units shy of the Camry who is # 1.
 
So the current Malibu with the 2.4L engine and 6 speed automatic is rated for 33MPG on the highway. They said with aerodynamics they picked up 2.5MPG, so that would give us 35.5MPG. With the new engine being directly injected and also with the new generation they claim something like a 15% increase due to a reduction in internal friction or something.

the 2013 Malibu with the 2.5L engine and 6 speed automatic has a hard fight ahead of itself. For the first time in a long time it looks like there is going to be a huge difference between the different vehicles.
 
GM engineers must be having nightmares right now. Actually everybody is having nightmares. With this efficiency, what is the point in buying a Corolla/Civic/Cruze/Focus/Elantra/3/...etc when you can have a bigger car with better comfort/safety along with similar mpg?
 
The $26,000 Malibu ECO makes no sense now.
I'll say this, the new 2.5 (the one that hasn't been released yet and won't be until later this year) Better be a significant improvement over the 2.4. I'm talking the extra 10 or so HP and TQ we are talking about...PLUS a smoother engine, PLUS we have to be looking for at least 35mpg in the Malibu

Even if the Malibu has more aggressive gearing than the Altima, the 2.5 is a failure at launch if it can't get at least 35 (strictly because of what the competition is now doing.)
 
It will be interesting to see if the 38/27 mpg hold up if/when the EPA does their own test ('12 BMW 328i lost 3 mpg hhwy and 1 city after EPA test). If it holds, then it sets the bar. Heck, seems like they left some mpg on the table by not upgrading the engine for DI. Gotta save something for the next MCE.
 
GM engineers must be having nightmares right now. Actually everybody is having nightmares. With this efficiency, what is the point in buying a Corolla/Civic/Cruze/Focus/Elantra/3/...etc when you can have a bigger car with better comfort/safety along with similar mpg?
That's absurd. A comparably equipped Corolla/Civic/Cruz/Focus/Elantra will still be cheaper, and in some cases, will get better mileage.

Talking about the 3 in this context is just ridiculous. Most people who buy BMWs are looking for a sportier driving experience and/or the image and dealer pampering that come with a luxury brand. Nissan's image is anything but premium and their dealers are nothing to write home about.

And finally, let's not get too carried away with the estimated 38mpg.
 
21 - 40 of 141 Posts