OpEd Why no Firebird or Trans Am?

  1. Welcome to GM Inside News Forum Ė General discussion forum for GM

    Welcome to GM Inside News Forum - a website dedicated to all things GM.

    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, Join GM Inside News Forum today!
     
Page 1 of 15 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 222

Thread: OpEd Why no Firebird or Trans Am?

  1. #1
    GMI Contributor
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    11,887
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2,425 Times in 1,474 Posts

    OpEd Why no Firebird or Trans Am?

    This is a no brainer
    May 17th, 2015
    by MonaroSS





    Why no Firebird or Trans Am?














    Seriously....

    Why no Firebird?

    I can understand why no Firebird with the Gen5 Camaro because GM had closed down the Pontiac Division and rid itself of the Pontiac Dealer network. To suddenly announce a new "Pontiac Firebird by Buick" to be sold out of the Buick/GMC Dealer network would have been too raw and contentious.

    But time heals all wounds or at least lets them scab-over.

    Now there are some compelling reasons why GM should revive the Pontiac Firebird...

    1. If there were a pent up demand for Camaro when Gen5 was released then that is doubly so for a Pontiac Firebird.

    2. Buick/GMC Dealers have no sports car to attract a broader range of customer and round out their offerings.

    3. The New Gen6, while a fine looking car with all new details, has for some - perhaps many - too much familiarity to the Gen5. It is understandable why GM played it safe with a winning formula. But a good measure of potential customers will be put off because it's not different enough - and a much more unique Pontiac Firebird can be the alternative to attract those customers rather than let them wander over to their Ford dealer. The Gen6 will age faster than the Gen5 because the look is already 10 years old - which some will love - but others who get bored of it would have the Firebird to entice them.

    4. In staying the course with the look of the Gen5, and it's gun slit windows, there is another set of customers who feel the windows are too restrictive and the interior ambiance is too claustrophobic. A Firebird allows GM a second bite of the cherry by using unique doors and door windows as shown here that are a few inches larger and thus more airy, as well as giving the Firebird a more distinct identity.

    GM does not have to restart the Pontiac Division or the Pontiac Dealer network. Just slap a "Pontiac Firebird by Buick" badge on it and sell it out of Buick/GMC Dealers. Good to Go. If those wanting a new Firebird won't go buy one from a Buick Dealer then they don't really want one...











    Pontiac Firebird by Buick would command a premium and could be like GMC to Chevy Trucks and SUV's and like Escalade
    to Chevy - a premium product that has had most of it's development paid for by Chevrolet and thus its sales would be like
    printing money for GM.

    Put in a premium leather interior and extra content. Drop the base 2.0T and use the V6 as base. Offer the 2.0T Hybrid
    powertrain from CT6 and the ATS-V's TTV6, and top out the engine lineup with one of GM's HiPo V8's.

    With a longer, narrower and lower nose the Firebird would be more aerodynamic than Camaro and thus might do well in Hybrid form as a promotion of GM tech for both fuel economy and sports fun. An all electric or Voltec version could be interesting as well.










    What do you think, tell us and come back to comment on what others thought as well...






    Last edited by MonaroSS; 05-17-2015 at 12:03 PM.

  2. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to MonaroSS For This Useful Post:

    1958carnut (05-17-2015),AMERICA 123 (05-18-2015),Canuck (05-17-2015),EJD1984 (05-17-2015),GM_Guy81 (05-19-2015),icantdrive55 (05-17-2015),LetsRace (05-17-2015),NINETY_EIGHT_REGENCY (05-17-2015),scford58 (05-17-2015),steve333 (05-17-2015),Who's Who (05-18-2015)

  3. Remove Advertisements
    GM Inside News
    Advertisements
     

  4. #2
    GMI Contributor
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    11,887
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2,425 Times in 1,474 Posts

    Re: OpEd Why no Firebird?

    A thread for those sick of whether Camaro is 200lb lighter model for model...





  5. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to MonaroSS For This Useful Post:

    AMERICA 123 (05-18-2015),sfbreh (05-17-2015),zl-1 (05-19-2015)

  6. #3
    R2-D2 Astromech Droid sfbreh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    19,260
    Thanks
    7,625
    Thanked 8,771 Times in 5,646 Posts

    Re: OpEd Why no Firebird?

    I like the concept of reviving niche models as brands by other brands, but only if they can be done profitably and with adequate differentiation.

  7. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to sfbreh For This Useful Post:

    AMERICA 123 (05-18-2015),LetsRace (05-17-2015),NINETY_EIGHT_REGENCY (05-17-2015),ocmdog (05-18-2015),zl-1 (05-19-2015)

  8. Remove Advertisements
    GM Inside News
    Advertisements
     

  9. #4
    News Contributor Premium Member EJD1984's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    5,457
    Thanks
    1,128
    Thanked 2,339 Times in 1,147 Posts
    My Ride
    2014 GMC Sierra

    Re: OpEd Why no Firebird?

    Phenomenal looking! I'd buy one in a heartbeat!

    Give the aftermarket time, and there will be conversions similar to this available.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to EJD1984 For This Useful Post:

    steve333 (05-17-2015)

  11. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Philadelphia PA
    Posts
    943
    Thanks
    401
    Thanked 329 Times in 203 Posts
    My Ride
    2012 Lincoln MKT

    Re: OpEd Why no Firebird?

    Pass... Just leave the dead be. This would be nothing more than a rehash of a rehash and I for one am I tired of rehashed hash.

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 0fxxk0 For This Useful Post:

    bone (05-18-2015),vette61 (05-18-2015)

  13. #6
    6.2 Liter LS3 V8 bmwboy2007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Columbus Circle
    Posts
    3,393
    Thanks
    246
    Thanked 1,288 Times in 678 Posts

    Re: OpEd Why no Firebird?

    Trans Am version?

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to bmwboy2007 For This Useful Post:

    AMERICA 123 (05-18-2015)

  15. #7
    5.3 Liter Vortec V8 kmacleod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    AZO
    Posts
    1,330
    Thanks
    956
    Thanked 145 Times in 83 Posts
    My Ride
    2014 Cruze TD , 88 Fiero GT

    Re: OpEd Why no Firebird?

    MonaroSS,

    I can see this as well as "OPEL by Buick" making a comeback for limited edition models
    brought over from Europe without having to start another division in NA.

    Sold and serviced by a Buick dealer. What a concept.....

    Ken

  16. #8
    SKH
    SKH is offline
    6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    5,828
    Thanks
    1,310
    Thanked 2,952 Times in 1,804 Posts
    My Ride
    LR Discovery '17 SiliconSilver

    Re: OpEd Why no Firebird?

    Quote Originally Posted by sfbreh View Post
    I like the concept of reviving niche models as brands by other brands, but only if they can be done profitably and with adequate differentiation.
    I've always been of the opinion that after a suitable amount of time has passed since they deep six'd Pontiac that GM should use the name for a series of limited edition models. Only one model would be on sale at any given moment and once it's limited run, 2-4 years is done it would get replaced with a new model. Firebird, Grand Prix/AM coupe, BONNEVILLE SEDAN ( M5/AMG competitor) and as suggested by MonaroSS sell them through GMC dealers.

  17. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SKH For This Useful Post:

    AMERICA 123 (05-18-2015),Neanderthal (05-17-2015)

  18. #9
    GMI Contributor
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    11,887
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2,425 Times in 1,474 Posts

    Re: OpEd Why no Firebird?

    Quote Originally Posted by bmwboy2007 View Post
    Trans Am version?
    It would take a lot of time to do it properly on such a hood as that, but here is a quickie...






  19. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to MonaroSS For This Useful Post:

    2648562 (05-17-2015),BlackGTP (05-17-2015),bmwboy2007 (05-17-2015),Commodoreman2000 (05-17-2015),EJD1984 (05-17-2015),goatgary (05-17-2015),icantdrive55 (05-17-2015)

  20. #10
    6.2 Liter LS3 V8 tripowergto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Rowland PA
    Posts
    3,083
    Thanks
    322
    Thanked 395 Times in 192 Posts

    Re: OpEd Why no Firebird?

    I could accept this.
    16 Garnet Red 1LT RS Camaro 6SPD
    14 Torch Red 1LT Corvette 455HP 7SPD
    14 Crystal Red Volt w/heated cloth
    10 Inferno Orange Camaro 2SS 426HP 6SPD "MAIDEN" (TOTALED!)
    09 Stryker Blue Pontiac G8 GT w/sport/prem/sunroof
    06 GTO 400HP LS2 6SPD(traded)
    02 Firebird Formula LS1 HURST 6SPD(1st new car)
    83 El Camino Conquista 350(RIP G8 ST) Hidden Content

  21. #11
    1.4 Liter Turbocharged ECOTEC
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Finger Lakes, NY
    Posts
    79
    Thanks
    74
    Thanked 37 Times in 20 Posts
    My Ride
    16 Colorado Z71 4x4 Crew

    Re: OpEd Why no Firebird?

    Seems legit....... I'll take the Camaro but my Dad would buy Firebird/Trans-Am

  22. #12
    2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    136
    Thanks
    333
    Thanked 85 Times in 41 Posts

    Re: OpEd Why no Firebird?

    This is a really good chop - and it could work since the only exterior changes would be the front and rear clips, headlights, tail lights etc... Interior would need more changes to make it look and feel more Pontiac rather than Chevy but...

    A high-power model with a tight suspension steering package - badged as a Trans Am would definitely sell.

    The idea of rotating a unique limited edition model every 4-5 years might be good too. I could see a short run GTO or even a Grand Prix (real Grand Prix, not a four-door sedan).

  23. #13
    4.4 Liter Supercharged Northstar GM-Joe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    2,882
    Thanks
    200
    Thanked 147 Times in 82 Posts
    My Ride
    2014 Chevrolet Impala

    Re: OpEd Why no Firebird?

    Sure, why not? I'd like to see a few Pontiacs in BG dealerships, but there are a couple of big problems doing this. Firstly, GM is in need of crossovers, not sports coupes and secondly, the Firebird would compete against the Camaro. The market for sports coupes is small, pretty much monopolized by the Camaro and Mustang; if you add Firebird, it dilutes the Camaro and adds additional expenses.
    Sold:
    2007 Pontiac Grand Prix (105k mi.).
    1997 Saab 900 2.0 Turbo(150k+ mi.)
    Retired:
    1987 Chevrolet Silverado 10 (retired 11/12/2007; 219,986 mi.)
    Dead:
    1983 Datsun 280 ZX by Nissan (146,857 mi.)
    1986 Lincoln Mercury Lynx (64K mi.)
    1979 Chrysler Cordoba w/ Corinthian Leather seats (130K mi.)
    1976 Dodge Charger (130K mi.)

  24. #14
    2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    320
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 59 Times in 29 Posts

    Re: OpEd Why no Firebird?

    Just let the dead stay dead.

    This could never happen. Remember the copywrites went with everything else.

    The current owners would sue in a heartbeat.

  25. #15
    6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8 KingElvis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    6,237
    Thanks
    823
    Thanked 754 Times in 630 Posts
    My Ride
    '10 DODGE RAM ST RC HEMI 4.10

    Re: OpEd Why no Firebird?

    I don't buy the "Pontiac by Buick" tack. Poncho is crossed off the list.

    But would be fascinating to see a Buick "f body"

    Why not make a Riviera F body? Could be distinguished by using all turbo engines. Just change the front and rear fascias and use different wheels.
    Check out my automotive blog Hidden Content

  26. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to KingElvis For This Useful Post:

    1958carnut (05-17-2015),Tone (05-17-2015)

  27. Remove Advertisements
    GM Inside News
    Advertisements
     

Page 1 of 15 12311 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.2