Rex's Montana SV6

  1. Welcome to GM Inside News Forum – General discussion forum for GM

    Welcome to GM Inside News Forum - a website dedicated to all things GM.

    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, Join GM Inside News Forum today!
     
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Rex's Montana SV6

  1. #1
    Firebird Concept (the turbine one) Premium Member Rex Raider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    12,307
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

  2. Remove Advertisements
    GM Inside News
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    3eb
    3eb is offline
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    316
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    well...it's definitely better. but something about those side windows still looks completely 1996 to me...it just looks outdated. i think the entire roofline and side windows need a redo. but i realize you were just going more for a different model variant of the vehicle that's already in place, i understand but i will just never be pleased with these vans...

  4. #3
    GMI Contributor Premium Member Ming's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    An Alternate Timeline
    Posts
    14,692
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Nice Rex! This is the one with the 12-speaker sound system and the 3900 engine, right?

  5. Remove Advertisements
    GM Inside News
    Advertisements
     

  6. #4
    6.0 Liter L76 V8
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    The driver's seat
    Posts
    2,231
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    sorry Rex- it looks good, but there's too much change for too little net improvement, IMO.

  7. #5
    Firebird Concept (the turbine one) Premium Member Rex Raider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    12,307
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    I purposely kept it similar enough to the original, so that it would be a low cost change over to this newer design.

    To really succeed, GM needs to scrap these vans and start from fresh.

  8. #6
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    70
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Nice, but how's the door gonna open without a rail?

  9. #7
    Guest
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    387
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Originally posted by Jon02SilverGT@Feb 7 2004, 06:04 PM
    Nice, but how's the door gonna open without a rail?
    they can set up a 2 rails system one on the top an one on the bottom so that u dont have that ugly indent line thing
    It can be doen since the mpv has this kind of system

  10. #8
    Firebird Concept (the turbine one) Premium Member Rex Raider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    12,307
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Exactly

  11. #9
    3.6 Liter SIDI V6 cyboexpo2002's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    1,085
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    My Ride
    2010 Camaro & 2011 GTI
    Originally posted by Rex Raider@Feb 7 2004, 06:23 PM
    Exactly
    /me thinks that Rex Raider logo is a violation of Rolls Royce trademarks :lol:

  12. #10
    Firebird Concept (the turbine one) Premium Member Rex Raider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    12,307
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Originally posted by cyboexpo2002+Feb 7 2004, 02:31 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (cyboexpo2002 @ Feb 7 2004, 02:31 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Rex Raider@Feb 7 2004, 06:23 PM
    Exactly
    /me thinks that Rex Raider logo is a violation of Rolls Royce trademarks :lol: [/b][/quote]
    Exactly

  13. Remove Advertisements
    GM Inside News
    Advertisements
     

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.2