Mid-engined Vette - Page 2

  1. Welcome to GM Inside News Forum – General discussion forum for GM

    Welcome to GM Inside News Forum - a website dedicated to all things GM.

    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, Join GM Inside News Forum today!
     
+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 27 of 27

Thread: Mid-engined Vette

  1. #16
    Chevrolet VOLT
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Dandenong (Melbourne) Australia
    Posts
    10,343
    Thanks
    1,122
    Thanked 842 Times in 603 Posts
    My Ride
    1999 Ford Fairmont Wagon

    Re: Mid-engined Vette

    nicely done -both of you!

  2. Remove Advertisements
    GM Inside News
    Advertisements
     

  3. #17
    7.0 Liter LS7 V8
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Logged off
    Posts
    4,723
    Thanks
    1,348
    Thanked 1,141 Times in 635 Posts

    Re: Mid-engined Vette

    Technically, the current Corvette is already mid-engined as the motor is mounted behind the front wheel centres. Mounting the engine behind the seats would give it more exotic car proportions and incrementally provide more weight in the drive wheels. The latter may be important as the Corvette approaches 700 hp without the aid of AWD.

  4. #18
    6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8 camaro_freak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    5,947
    Thanks
    972
    Thanked 282 Times in 140 Posts

    Re: Mid-engined Vette

    love it - the rear end treatment is LIGHT-YEARS more interesting than what was put on the new Stingray - WELL DONE
    Hidden Content
    Check out my blog at: Hidden Content



  5. Remove Advertisements
    GM Inside News
    Advertisements
     

  6. #19
    R2-D2 Astromech Droid sfbreh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    19,260
    Thanks
    7,625
    Thanked 8,770 Times in 5,645 Posts

    Re: Mid-engined Vette

    Still impressed.

  7. #20
    6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    England
    Posts
    7,677
    Thanks
    714
    Thanked 2,492 Times in 1,885 Posts
    My Ride
    VW Touareg 3.0 V6 TDI

    Re: Mid-engined Vette

    Quote Originally Posted by Tone View Post
    Technically, the current Corvette is already mid-engined as the motor is mounted behind the front wheel centres. Mounting the engine behind the seats would give it more exotic car proportions and incrementally provide more weight in the drive wheels. The latter may be important as the Corvette approaches 700 hp without the aid of AWD.
    That's not what is generally accepted as "mid-engined"

    Sports cars, and indeed almost all cars from the '30s had their engine behind the front-axle - and indeed many 4x4s do to allow good front axle articulation.

    As well as improving rear traction, a mid-mounted engine behind the driver improves handling as the polar moment of inertia is greatly reduced - the main reason why F1 cars changed from front-engined to mid-engined in '58-60.

  8. #21
    6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    England
    Posts
    7,677
    Thanks
    714
    Thanked 2,492 Times in 1,885 Posts
    My Ride
    VW Touareg 3.0 V6 TDI

    Re: Mid-engined Vette

    Quote Originally Posted by SKH View Post
    The Range Rover Hybrid has the electric motor paired with the ZF 8 Speed transmission. Does anyone know how that additional power gets to the driveline to supplement the engine, or does it It power the car after it disengages the Diesel engine?? Does it hook up with the drive from the engine before it goes into the transmission? So many questions lol. I realize this arrangement probably wouldn't be able to give the Vette drive to the front wheels, but I'm just curious as to how this arrangement works? Okay someone educate me please!
    On the Range Rover hybrid, the motor/generator is placed between the engine and the transmission - it can then generate from the engine on the overrun and from braking - and then supplement the engine power when needed - to avoid compromising off-road ability, the 4wd part of the drive train remains unchanged.

    Lexus RX450h and Volvo hybrids work slightly differently - they're essentially FWD hybrids with a motor/generator between the engine and the FWD transmission - but with an additional motor at the rear to drive the rear axle.

    In the context of a mid-engined Corvette hybrid, it would be possible to mount the motor/generator between engine and transmission and then an electric motor at the front driving the front wheels to supplement the power output. I guess the redundant transmission tunnel could be used for the battery.
    Last edited by Ruperts Trooper; 07-07-2014 at 03:03 AM.

  9. #22
    6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8 camaro_freak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    5,947
    Thanks
    972
    Thanked 282 Times in 140 Posts

    Re: Mid-engined Vette

    Quote Originally Posted by MonaroSS View Post
    Mate, great concept and artistry. If I may make a suggestion it would be that abstract wheels only really impress art students and faculty. The rest of us like to see what it would really look like with real wheels. Looks good on real wheels I think...


    keep doing what YOU LIKE TO DO Commodore88 - I love your renders just the way they are

    You have an amazing talent.
    Hidden Content
    Check out my blog at: Hidden Content



  10. The Following User Says Thank You to camaro_freak For This Useful Post:

    hrcslam (08-11-2014)

  11. #23
    GMI Contributor
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    11,887
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2,425 Times in 1,474 Posts

    Re: Mid-engined Vette

    Quote Originally Posted by camaro_freak View Post
    keep doing what YOU LIKE TO DO Commodore88 - I love your renders just the way they are

    You have an amazing talent.
    Yes, they look great as works of art.

    But they are left wanting as a means of letting ordinary people know what the design will actually look like on the road.

    Artists are artists. Designers use art, but a designer has to convey information as well. It's all down to whether one wants to be an artist, in which case you can be as esoteric as you wish, or a designer creating something intended for a marketplace....





  12. #24
    3.0 Liter SIDI V6 commodore88's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ - Detroit, MI
    Posts
    531
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 10 Times in 4 Posts

    Re: Mid-engined Vette

    Quote Originally Posted by MonaroSS View Post
    Yes, they look great as works of art.

    But they are left wanting as a means of letting ordinary people know what the design will actually look like on the road.

    Artists are artists. Designers use art, but a designer has to convey information as well. It's all down to whether one wants to be an artist, in which case you can be as esoteric as you wish, or a designer creating something intended for a marketplace....




    It's a quick pen sketch, the one you did a rendering of took all of a few minutes. The point of quick ideation sketches like these ones are to show variations of graphics, proportions and lines, not a realistic interpretation (that comes later). For a school project I will do dozens of upon dozens of ideation pages before I land on a few designs I deem worthy of further exploration. The ideation is all about getting as many ideas as possible on to paper and onto paper quickly. Adding realistic details like complete wheels and tires comes later. When doing a rendering of the final design it would be appropriate to spend time on parts like that. I actually love doing that part (I have many renderings as proof), but for the ideation stage it's just a waste of time.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to commodore88 For This Useful Post:

    camaro_freak (07-20-2014)

  14. #25
    GMI Contributor
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    11,887
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2,425 Times in 1,474 Posts

    Re: Mid-engined Vette

    Quote Originally Posted by commodore88 View Post
    It's a quick pen sketch, the one you did a rendering of took all of a few minutes. The point of quick ideation sketches like these ones are to show variations of graphics, proportions and lines, not a realistic interpretation (that comes later). For a school project I will do dozens of upon dozens of ideation pages before I land on a few designs I deem worthy of further exploration. The ideation is all about getting as many ideas as possible on to paper and onto paper quickly. Adding realistic details like complete wheels and tires comes later. When doing a rendering of the final design it would be appropriate to spend time on parts like that. I actually love doing that part (I have many renderings as proof), but for the ideation stage it's just a waste of time.
    That is all well and good in that context. But my point does not relate to what details you do or do not put in during a session exploring ideas. My comment simply relates to when you deem to publish those ideas as you have here. Yes even the major car companies on release of a new vehicle will often publish such sketches to show the evolution of the original ideas from whence the car's design came. But it's part of a package where the viewer does not have to use their often limited 3 dimensional imagineering skills as the end product is also before them answering their question of 'what does this really look like?'

    This thread has 1,000 views and 20 odd replies. Perhaps 100 of the views are attributable to those twenty coming back to see what others have said. You know what they think, as limited by the detail of their comments. But the other 900 are the ones you need to be thinking about if you want a job creating real products for a marketplace. Those 900 who did not comment are that market place. Many of them would have said to themselves 'wow a talented guy' simply due to your artistry. But many probably really didn't "get" your design as you see it because you are overlaying in your mind's eye what these sketches represent to you. And yes most would be guests of the site, but if excited enough they will sign up just to comment on your work. I know at least a dozen members did so just to express their views to me. But communication is all about getting what is in your mind into the mind of the audience. And when you publish your work, as you have done here, then such communication, and how it's audience may process it, should be a paramount concern.

    In large corporations, in my experience, you don't often get a face to face with the real decision makers most of the time, especially when starting out. Your work goes through intermediaries who may not properly express or even know your thoughts. So your work has to speak for you. And you should never forget who the end recipient is of your communications through your graphics will be. And what their limited design or graphic interpretation skills are. I assure you most of the executives atop the GM RenCen towers have little more skill in that regard than the guy selling hot dogs from a cart on the street below. They, or people like them, may one day be your end audience.

    Another important thing about sketches like yours, which are adored by art and design students the world over, is that such art 'tricks' - as you have used to represent the wheels - can cover up poor designs and lack of novelty. When I put wheels on your design it dropped several points on the desirability and innovative scale simply because now it looks more like so many other design concepts. In the form you presented it, it looked almost like some futuristic hover car from a SciFi movie. But if you think my adding wheels is bad, wait until you meet production engineers. Their heads are not filled with fanciful idealism, but with math and numbers. They rip unrealistic designs apart and put them back together as things that can be made using as many compromising but cheaply available parts as they can incorporate.

    So often we complain how some glamorous show car, which is already way compromised from it's designer's original sketches, gets further diluted when it goes into production as another blandmobile. Well that happens because the designer lost the fight with the production engineers, who always have to backing of the accountants and win 9 times out of 10.

    This here is just my advice to you, which you can take or leave at your choosing, But you have to ask yourself at some point what kind of designer you want to be. The guy who actually gets great and innovative design onto the street, or the guy who complains at cocktail parties about all his great ideas that got ruined by others on the way to the street?

    The best way to defeat the blandness of the production engineers is to do their job for them and make all the production compromises yourself in your own way and in your own time. This allows you to have more control and to preserve the essence of your innovation. But that means taking the blinders off and not buying your own propaganda that such drawing tricks can induce. Get used to as early as possible presenting your designs, even to yourself, as production ready as possible. You will better see where the usable innovation is. And then you can develop it in-line with production requirements. Yes the other designers around you will be using all these tricks to make their designs seem more innovative than yours. But that just means you will have to work harder than them, as all truly successful people must do. But it will pay big dividends in the long run. And one day that could make you the new Harley Earl...




  15. #26
    6.2 Liter LS3 V8 voyager's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Posts
    3,941
    Thanks
    119
    Thanked 463 Times in 329 Posts
    My Ride
    Guzzi Monza Alfa Romeo 156SW

    Re: Mid-engined Vette

    Reminds me of the Lamborghini 'Egoista' concept (single-seater). Looking like a car with stealthy qualities, to avoid getting caught by radar... which is good. I dig.

    Last edited by voyager; 08-11-2014 at 02:33 AM.
    Hidden Content GeneratinGMobilizing
    Hidden Content

  16. #27
    6.2 Liter LS3 V8 hrcslam's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Maricopa, AZ
    Posts
    3,193
    Thanks
    540
    Thanked 109 Times in 69 Posts
    My Ride
    1995 Camaro Z28 6 Speed

    Re: Mid-engined Vette

    Quote Originally Posted by camaro_freak View Post
    keep doing what YOU LIKE TO DO Commodore88 - I love your renders just the way they are

    You have an amazing talent.
    Agreed. Somethings are more about the character lines than the finished product. Sure the added detail helps for some folks, but for others it's not. It's about the art. Making that art work in the real world is a different and much harder story. Drawings like the OP's are only for the art as the likeliness of actual production aren't even being considered.
    Last edited by hrcslam; 08-11-2014 at 10:18 AM.
    Hidden Content

    Hidden Content
    2001 Suburban, lowered (3/5) Magna flow, free mods, CAI, tune, built 4L60e. 200,xxx miles. - Sold
    2014 Ford Focus SE Hatchback 19,xxx miles.

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to hrcslam For This Useful Post:

    camaro_freak (09-10-2014)

  18. Remove Advertisements
    GM Inside News
    Advertisements
     

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.2