That aint all that bad, I would just like more agressive wheels and a slightly different facia (I know the original beretta was just a re-badge job, but this is the NEW GM, so lets see it) Great Job!
no offence, but that's disgusting. it looks like an impala had raped a new malibu and this is the ******* result. that car has the same aesthetic appeal as my fat arse.
it's a nice chop though
the work you did to the headlights is nice....i wish GM would trim them down the way you have, although it's still not an overly attractive front end. i don't find the back half to be overly appealing either.
The rear overhang is killing me. . . :pain:
way too long
The rear overhang was untouched from the current Malibu.
And if anything, it looks like a Monte Carlo raped a Malibu. The Impala was innocent.
i think he thought the overhang looked long because of the decklid which is considerably longer.
I won't argue with the photochop - great job in making it seamlessly come together.
But I agree the rear looks too large too much overhang - less like the Impala - it reminds me a lot more of the Monte Carlo's rear end.
Now I'll argue what GM should do - although I think you nailed what they *would* do, if left to the Monte Carlo designers at Chevy.
I think it would look great if you Chevy Vega'd the rear end. Taper the rear from the c-pillar line down and give it a blunt taillight area - or use the rear from the Malibu MAXX.
Maybe it would just look better as a 2 door shortened Malibu Maxx - same wheelbase as the standard Malibu. A reflective panel on the rear hatch could read "Beretta".
I would buy a Malibu-variant like this. Hatch utility, coupe sportiness and reduced weight. All with the optional 200hp 3.5L V6. Nice. Of course it would need at least TAP shift, or a manual to even pretend to be sporty.
Could you cut six inches out between the back of the door and rear wheel centerline? Then section the body two inches and chop the top maybe an inch?
Never worked with Photshop, so maybe you can't. Your getting there, but that rear end proportion relative to the wheelbase is Monte Carlo ugly.
Just my .02.....
I don't think it looks that bad. If the door was a little longer, it wouldn't look out of proportion. GM doesn't really have a good coupe to compete with the Accord coupe-- the Monte Carlo just isn't the same.
Neat concept. GM needs to fix the front of the Malibu and this is a good attempt, just go farther, I don't like the grill or headlamps.
An alternative to the Accord coupe is needed by Chevy
The name Beretta needs to remain retired.
Malibu used to be offered as a coupe and sedan why not do it again?
What about a convertible version?
Pontiac is going to have a G6 convertible/hardtop why not a Chevy?
This concept will help GM achieve the sales volumes it expects out of Chevy.
The door makes a nice change,
What about a more pronounced rear wheel bulge?
Saturn style suicide doors?
sliding rear doors?
moving the rear wheel back farther?
SEMA treatment to the entire car?
A coupe doesn't need 2 extra doors. That's something silly that Saturn and Mazda have. If you want a sedan, buy a sedan. You aren't fooling anyone.
Changing the wheelbase would not be cost effective. This car is Malibu based, so it should share as many common parts as possible to reduce costs.
If it is a coupe make it more aggressive, Honda and Toyota makes changes from the Accord sedan, Toyota Camry and Accord and Solara coupes so why can't Chevy? Cost is always important but appearance changes can be do cheap. The wheelbase is just an idea concepts don't have to be real.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)