2006 Chevrolet Beretta

  1. Welcome to GM Inside News Forum – General discussion forum for GM

    Welcome to GM Inside News Forum - a website dedicated to all things GM.

    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, Join GM Inside News Forum today!
     
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17

Thread: 2006 Chevrolet Beretta

  1. #1
    Firebird Concept (the turbine one) Premium Member Rex Raider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    12,307
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

  2. Remove Advertisements
    GM Inside News
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    Chevrolet VOLT Premium Member TaHoE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    10,279
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    My Ride
    2013 Chevrolet Volt
    That aint all that bad, I would just like more agressive wheels and a slightly different facia (I know the original beretta was just a re-badge job, but this is the NEW GM, so lets see it) Great Job!

  4. #3
    Guest
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    396
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    no offence, but that's disgusting. it looks like an impala had raped a new malibu and this is the ******* result. that car has the same aesthetic appeal as my fat arse.

    it's a nice chop though

  5. Remove Advertisements
    GM Inside News
    Advertisements
     

  6. #4
    3eb
    3eb is offline
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    316
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    the work you did to the headlights is nice....i wish GM would trim them down the way you have, although it's still not an overly attractive front end. i don't find the back half to be overly appealing either.

  7. #5
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    151
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    The rear overhang is killing me. . . :pain:

    way too long

  8. #6
    Firebird Concept (the turbine one) Premium Member Rex Raider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    12,307
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    The rear overhang was untouched from the current Malibu.

    And if anything, it looks like a Monte Carlo raped a Malibu. The Impala was innocent.

  9. #7
    3eb
    3eb is offline
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    316
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    i think he thought the overhang looked long because of the decklid which is considerably longer.

  10. #8
    GMI Contributor Premium Member Ming's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    An Alternate Timeline
    Posts
    14,692
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    I won't argue with the photochop - great job in making it seamlessly come together.

    But I agree the rear looks too large too much overhang - less like the Impala - it reminds me a lot more of the Monte Carlo's rear end.

    Now I'll argue what GM should do - although I think you nailed what they *would* do, if left to the Monte Carlo designers at Chevy.

    I think it would look great if you Chevy Vega'd the rear end. Taper the rear from the c-pillar line down and give it a blunt taillight area - or use the rear from the Malibu MAXX.

    Maybe it would just look better as a 2 door shortened Malibu Maxx - same wheelbase as the standard Malibu. A reflective panel on the rear hatch could read "Beretta".
    :P

    I would buy a Malibu-variant like this. Hatch utility, coupe sportiness and reduced weight. All with the optional 200hp 3.5L V6. Nice. Of course it would need at least TAP shift, or a manual to even pretend to be sporty.


  11. #9
    7.0 Liter LS7 V8 prowlerjc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    4,181
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked 60 Times in 35 Posts
    Could you cut six inches out between the back of the door and rear wheel centerline? Then section the body two inches and chop the top maybe an inch?

    Never worked with Photshop, so maybe you can't. Your getting there, but that rear end proportion relative to the wheelbase is Monte Carlo ugly.

    Just my .02.....

  12. #10
    6.0 Liter L76 V8
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    The driver's seat
    Posts
    2,231
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    I don't think it looks that bad. If the door was a little longer, it wouldn't look out of proportion. GM doesn't really have a good coupe to compete with the Accord coupe-- the Monte Carlo just isn't the same.

  13. #11
    6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8 Canuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    5,174
    Thanks
    501
    Thanked 34 Times in 16 Posts
    My Ride
    09 CTS 3.6DI AWD, 05 Envoy
    Neat concept. GM needs to fix the front of the Malibu and this is a good attempt, just go farther, I don't like the grill or headlamps.
    An alternative to the Accord coupe is needed by Chevy
    The name Beretta needs to remain retired.
    Malibu used to be offered as a coupe and sedan why not do it again?
    What about a convertible version?
    Pontiac is going to have a G6 convertible/hardtop why not a Chevy?
    This concept will help GM achieve the sales volumes it expects out of Chevy.

  14. #12
    Firebird Concept (the turbine one) Premium Member Rex Raider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    12,307
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Here is a slightly longer door.


  15. #13
    6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8 Canuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    5,174
    Thanks
    501
    Thanked 34 Times in 16 Posts
    My Ride
    09 CTS 3.6DI AWD, 05 Envoy
    The door makes a nice change,
    What about a more pronounced rear wheel bulge?
    Saturn style suicide doors?
    sliding rear doors?
    moving the rear wheel back farther?
    SEMA treatment to the entire car?

  16. #14
    Firebird Concept (the turbine one) Premium Member Rex Raider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    12,307
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    A coupe doesn't need 2 extra doors. That's something silly that Saturn and Mazda have. If you want a sedan, buy a sedan. You aren't fooling anyone.

    Changing the wheelbase would not be cost effective. This car is Malibu based, so it should share as many common parts as possible to reduce costs.

  17. #15
    6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8 Canuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    5,174
    Thanks
    501
    Thanked 34 Times in 16 Posts
    My Ride
    09 CTS 3.6DI AWD, 05 Envoy
    If it is a coupe make it more aggressive, Honda and Toyota makes changes from the Accord sedan, Toyota Camry and Accord and Solara coupes so why can't Chevy? Cost is always important but appearance changes can be do cheap. The wheelbase is just an idea concepts don't have to be real.

  18. Remove Advertisements
    GM Inside News
    Advertisements
     

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.2